FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2123202215> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2123202215 endingPage "723" @default.
• W2123202215 startingPage "717" @default.
• W2123202215 abstract "Background The aim of this study is to document a single surgeon's experience performing revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after baseplate failure. Methods Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for mechanical failure of the glenoid baseplate after RSA was performed in 14 patients. Clinical and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, prior to baseplate failure, after baseplate failure, and at latest follow-up after revision (average, 33 months). Results When comparing the pre-operative values to post-revision, ASES, forward elevation, and abduction were significantly improved. There was no significant difference in any of the outcome measures when comparing the prefailure data to the post-revision data. The post-revision prosthesis-scapular neck angle (PSNA) showed a significant increase in inferior tilt of the baseplate when compared to pre-failure PSNA (P < .001). Two patients (14%) required a second revision RSA for glenoid baseplate failure (1) and dislocation (1); 1 additional patient developed a postoperative hematoma which resolved without surgery. Conclusion Revision RSA for the treatment of glenoid baseplate mechanical failure can restore pain relief and function to the levels gained after the index RSA. Level of evidence Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study. The aim of this study is to document a single surgeon's experience performing revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after baseplate failure. Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for mechanical failure of the glenoid baseplate after RSA was performed in 14 patients. Clinical and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, prior to baseplate failure, after baseplate failure, and at latest follow-up after revision (average, 33 months). When comparing the pre-operative values to post-revision, ASES, forward elevation, and abduction were significantly improved. There was no significant difference in any of the outcome measures when comparing the prefailure data to the post-revision data. The post-revision prosthesis-scapular neck angle (PSNA) showed a significant increase in inferior tilt of the baseplate when compared to pre-failure PSNA (P < .001). Two patients (14%) required a second revision RSA for glenoid baseplate failure (1) and dislocation (1); 1 additional patient developed a postoperative hematoma which resolved without surgery. Revision RSA for the treatment of glenoid baseplate mechanical failure can restore pain relief and function to the levels gained after the index RSA." @default.
• W2123202215 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2123202215 creator A5005198323 @default.
• W2123202215 creator A5018804922 @default.
• W2123202215 creator A5044040074 @default.
• W2123202215 creator A5053053860 @default.
• W2123202215 creator A5062684595 @default.
• W2123202215 date "2009-09-01" @default.
• W2123202215 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2123202215 title "Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty" @default.
• W2123202215 cites W1986494589 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2001496935 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2010756009 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2012763165 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2030992623 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2041438603 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2052864996 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2093174967 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2119983775 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2120051361 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2127461613 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2138829659 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2139285877 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2145305179 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2151029846 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2160805195 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2164416065 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2171701625 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2273824762 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2342356234 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2398630864 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W2616304820 @default.
• W2123202215 cites W93056777 @default.
• W2123202215 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.017" @default.
• W2123202215 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19278872" @default.
• W2123202215 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2123202215 type Work @default.
• W2123202215 sameAs 2123202215 @default.
• W2123202215 citedByCount "103" @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152012 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152013 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152014 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152015 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152016 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152017 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152018 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152019 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152020 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152021 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152022 @default.
• W2123202215 countsByYear W21232022152023 @default.
• W2123202215 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2123202215 hasAuthorship W2123202215A5005198323 @default.
• W2123202215 hasAuthorship W2123202215A5018804922 @default.
• W2123202215 hasAuthorship W2123202215A5044040074 @default.
• W2123202215 hasAuthorship W2123202215A5053053860 @default.
• W2123202215 hasAuthorship W2123202215A5062684595 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConcept C2909143917 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConceptScore W2123202215C141071460 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConceptScore W2123202215C2778336525 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConceptScore W2123202215C2778715743 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConceptScore W2123202215C2909143917 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConceptScore W2123202215C36454342 @default.
• W2123202215 hasConceptScore W2123202215C71924100 @default.
• W2123202215 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2123202215 hasLocation W21232022151 @default.
• W2123202215 hasLocation W21232022152 @default.
• W2123202215 hasOpenAccess W2123202215 @default.
• W2123202215 hasPrimaryLocation W21232022151 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W1571397536 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W1970660315 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W2041459071 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W2130025324 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W2130837539 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W2410097536 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W2587015294 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W3132474721 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W3150734349 @default.
• W2123202215 hasRelatedWork W1492892722 @default.
• W2123202215 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W2123202215 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2123202215 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2123202215 magId "2123202215" @default.
• W2123202215 workType "article" @default.