FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2123381445> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2123381445 endingPage "4595" @default.
• W2123381445 startingPage "4586" @default.
• W2123381445 abstract "Article14 September 2006free access Viewing single λ site-specific recombination events from start to finish Jeffrey P Mumm Jeffrey P Mumm Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, J Walter Wilson Laboratories, Providence, RI, USAPresent address: Department of Biochemistry, MS 009 Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA Search for more papers by this author Arthur Landy Corresponding Author Arthur Landy Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, J Walter Wilson Laboratories, Providence, RI, USA Search for more papers by this author Jeff Gelles Jeff Gelles Department of Biochemistry, MS 009 Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA Search for more papers by this author Jeffrey P Mumm Jeffrey P Mumm Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, J Walter Wilson Laboratories, Providence, RI, USAPresent address: Department of Biochemistry, MS 009 Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA Search for more papers by this author Arthur Landy Corresponding Author Arthur Landy Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, J Walter Wilson Laboratories, Providence, RI, USA Search for more papers by this author Jeff Gelles Jeff Gelles Department of Biochemistry, MS 009 Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Jeffrey P Mumm1, Arthur Landy 1 and Jeff Gelles2 1Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, J Walter Wilson Laboratories, Providence, RI, USA 2Department of Biochemistry, MS 009 Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA *Corresponding author. Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, J Walter Wilson Laboratories, room 360, 69 Brown Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Tel.: +1 401 863 2566; Fax: +1 401 863 1348; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2006)25:4586-4595https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601325 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info The site-specific recombination pathway by which the bacteriophage λ chromosome is excised from its Escherichia coli host chromosome is a tightly regulated, highly directional, multistep reaction that is executed by a series of multiprotein complexes. Until now, it has been difficult to study the individual steps of such reactions in the context of the entire pathway. Using single-molecule light microscopy, we have examined this process from start to finish. Stable bent-DNA complexes containing integrase and the accessory proteins IHF (integration host factor) and Xis form rapidly on attL and attR recombination partners, and synapsis of partner complexes follows rapidly after their formation. Integrase-mediated DNA cleavage before or immediately after synapsis is required to stabilize the synaptic assemblies. Those complexes that synapsed (∼50% of the total) yield recombinant product with a remarkable ∼100% efficiency. The rate-limiting step of excision occurs after synapsis, but closely precedes or is concomitant with the appearance of a stable Holliday junction. Our kinetic analysis shows that directionality of this recombination reaction is conferred by the irreversibility of multiple reaction steps. Introduction The tyrosine recombinase family of site-specific recombinases is responsible for many important biological processes including regulation of gene expression and DNA replication, plasmid copy number maintenance, conjugative transposition, catenated circle resolution, daughter chromosome segregation, and prokaryotic telomere processing. The hallmark of this large family is a multistep reaction pathway in which a recombinase tetramer executes a sequential pair of strand exchanges that first generate and then resolve a four-way DNA junction (Holliday intermediate). This is accomplished via two pairs of staggered DNA cleavage and ligation reactions mediated by covalent 3′ phosphotyrosine linkages in the absence of high-energy cofactors (Figure 1A; for review see Sadowski, 1993; Grainge and Jayaram, 1999; Voziyanov et al, 1999; Azaro and Landy, 2002; Van Duyne, 2002). Figure 1.Intramolecular recombination substrates, generated products, and experimental design. (A) General scheme of the site-specific recombination reaction, in which parental DNAs (orange and blue) are recombined to form two hybrid DNA products (see text for details). The recombinase subunits (circles) that catalyze these reactions form a tetramer in which only one pair (filled) is DNA cleavage active. The reactivity of the Int pairs is reversed for the second pair of strand exchanges. All strand exchanges proceed through two successive transesterification reactions: a strand cleavage reaction in which a tyrosine side chain attacks the DNA backbone and a ligation in which the resulting phosphotyrosine linkage is attacked by a free DNA 5′ hydroxyl (star). (B) Maps of the recombination substrates and the products generated from their recombination. Top (excision): when the phage λ attachment sites are in direct repeat (attL+attR substrate), recombination generates separated linear attB and circular attP products. Bottom (inversion): the indirect repeat substrate (attLinvattR) recombines to form a single linear product in which the DNA between attB and attP attachment sites has been inverted. The presence of Xis prevents further recombination of both the excision and inversion products (Abremski and Gottesman, 1982). att sites contain 7 bp homologous DNA sequences (overlap region, O) between cleavage sites and multiple sites for binding of protein domains: N, Int N-terminal domain; C, Int catalytic domain; H, IHF; and X, Xis. Reversed lettering indicates inverted site orientation. IHF binding to the circled site inhibits excision; to avoid this, this site was inactivated by mutations (Thompson et al, 1986). The binding site for Fis protein, which overlaps with one of the Xis sites, is not shown because this host-encoded DNA-bending protein is not required for excision in the presence of sufficient Xis (Thompson et al, 1987a, 1987b) and was not included in these experiments. Both substrates are 1943 bp long and have att site overlap regions positioned 301 and 290 bp from the closest end. (C) Experimental design with attL+attR DNA. Each 200 nm polystyrene bead (sphere) is tethered to the coverslip surface of a flow chamber (black line) by a single substrate DNA molecule (orange and blue curve; Finzi and Gelles, 1995). Formation of non-covalent protein–DNA complexes that bend or loop DNA (e.g., att-site complexes or synaptic complexes) reduce the effective length of the tether and can be detected as a decrease in bead Brownian motion. Formation of covalent links between two DNA segments (in a Holliday junction) or excision of a DNA segment will have a similar effect. Effective tether length changes resulting from non-covalent protein–DNA interactions and those from covalent DNA backbone modifications can be distinguished by challenge with the protein denaturant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Download figure Download PowerPoint The site-specific recombination system of bacteriophage λ, which directs integration and excision of the viral chromosome into and out of the Escherichia coli host chromosome (Campbell, 1962), adds several levels of complexity to this basic mechanistic framework (for review see Nash, 1996; Azaro and Landy, 2002). Like other well-studied recombinase systems from this subfamily, including Tn916 (Rudy et al, 1997a, 1997b), HP1 (Hickman et al, 1997), and L5 (Lewis and Hatfull, 2001, 2003), the virally encoded recombinase (Int) is a heterobivalent DNA binding protein. It consists of a large carboxy-terminal domain that binds to ‘core-type’ DNA sites (C in Figure 1B) and carries out the enzymatic steps of recombination. This domain is analogous to the well-studied monovalent tyrosine recombinase proteins Cre and Flp (Esposito and Scocca, 1997; Nunes-Düby et al, 1998). Additionally, Int contains a small amino-terminal domain that binds with high affinity to ‘arm-type’ sites (N in Figure 1B) that are distant from the sites of DNA strand exchange. The ability of single Int protomers to bind distinct and widely separated DNA sites depends upon the presence of accessory proteins, which introduce sharp site-specific DNA bends and thereby bring the two classes of Int sites sufficiently close for the formation of specific Int bridges between the sites. Three site-specific accessory DNA-bending proteins and 16 protein binding sites are used to assemble large multiprotein recombinogenic complexes at specific loci, called att sites. Integrative recombination between attP and attB, on the phage and bacterial chromosomes, respectively, generates attL and attR sites at the junctions between the integrated prophage and the bacterial chromosome. During excisive recombination, complexes formed at the attL and attR sites recombine to regenerate attP on the excised viral DNA and attB on the restored E. coli chromosome. Excision is not the simple reverse of integration—the two reactions use different, partially overlapping subsets of protein binding sites (Figure 1) and different combinations of accessory DNA-bending proteins. In this report, we focus on excisive recombination, which is distinguished by its requirement for the virally encoded DNA-bending protein, Xis, (or its use of the host-encoded Fis protein when Xis is limiting). The third DNA-bending protein, host-encoded IHF (integration host factor), is required for both integrative and excisive recombination reactions but binds a different subset of loci in each. The heterobivalent feature of Int in conjunction with the accessory DNA-bending proteins confers a sophisticated regulation that is sensitive to bacterial host physiology (Bushman et al, 1985; Gardner and Nash, 1986; Thompson et al, 1987a; Ball and Johnson, 1991; Ball et al, 1992; Ditto et al, 1994). These features, which are absent in simpler DNA recombination reactions, are fundamental to lambda's environment-sensitive modulation of the viral life cycle. Although the λ Int pathway has been the subject of extensive genetic and biochemical analyses, it has been difficult with these traditional approaches to distinguish kinetically relevant from off-pathway species (a generic problem in the analysis of recombination pathways) and to measure the rates at which functionally important intermediates are processed in both the forward and reverse directions. Elucidating these mechanistic features is essential when determining how binding energy from the multiple protein–DNA interactions is used to achieve efficiency and directionality in the overall reaction. We addressed these issues by performing experiments in which recombination of individual isolated DNA molecules was observed from start to finish using light microscopy. We visualized the behavior of single DNA molecules by using them to tether a microscopic bead to a flow chamber bed. The DNA-tethered bead exhibits Brownian motion restricted to a hemisphere of radius equal to the DNA contour length. Using light microscopy techniques to visualize and record this bead motion, any change in the effective length of the DNA tether can be determined in real time. The effective tether length changes when the mean end-to-end distance of the DNA is decreased by protein-mediated DNA looping or bending (Figure 1C; Finzi and Gelles, 1995), or when a portion of the DNA is excised. Results Complex assembly on att site DNA To help elucidate the initial steps of the overall excision mechanism, we first determined the rates of formation and stability of the protein complex formed on a 1943 bp DNA containing a single attL (with its overlap region centered 301 bp from one end of the DNA). When Int, IHF, and Xis were added to a DNA tether containing attL, an abrupt decrease in effective tether length was detected in 100% of the molecules analyzed (Figure 2A and D, compare black and blue curves). The decrease (by 443±16 bp (mean±s.e.)) from the 1943 bp tether length of the naked DNA) is consistent with the formation of a bent nucleoprotein complex. In control experiments that used DNA without any att sites, addition of the three proteins had no discernable effect (Figure 2B and E, compare black and blue curves). Similarly, addition of Xis alone, which has no binding sites on attL, had no effect on the attL-containing DNA (data not shown). In contrast, IHF, which does have a single binding site on attL, was sufficient by itself to reduce the effective tether length by 284±15 bp (Figure 2D, compare black and red curves). Shortening by IHF alone is predicted from the >160° DNA bend it induces upon binding to its cognate site in attL (Rice et al, 1996). In accordance with previously published results (Moitoso de Vargas et al, 1989; Kim et al, 1990; Segall and Nash, 1996; MacWilliams et al, 1997), the significant (P=0.05) additional shortening observed with all three proteins over that seen with IHF alone is consistent with the attL complexes having at least one Int protomer simultaneously bound to and bridging N- and C-type DNA sites, thereby closing a DNA loop between these sites (Figure 1B). Behavior of cleavage-incompetent mutants K235A and H308L on attL DNA is indistinguishable from that of wild-type Int, demonstrating that formation of a stable attL complex does not require a covalent Int-DNA linkage (data not shown). This interpretation is consistent with the observation that in all experiments, addition of 0.2% SDS returned the DNA to its original length within experimental uncertainty. Taken together, the data suggest that the attL complexes observed here by single-molecule microscopy are identical, or very similar, to those characterized previously by genetics and solution biochemistry (Moitoso de Vargas et al, 1989; Kim et al, 1990; Segall and Nash, 1996; MacWilliams et al, 1997). Figure 2.Specific complex formation on DNA molecules with only one att site. (A–C) Changes in the effective lengths of single DNA molecules in response to the addition of recombination proteins Int, Xis, and IHF. The three proteins or the SDS challenge were added at the times indicated by dashed lines. Both unfiltered (blue; 2.13 s time resolution) and filtered (red) data are shown. Noise in tethered-particle motion (TPM) measurements increases with the increasing tether length (Yin et al, 1994). Wild-type proteins were added to single DNA molecules containing a single attL (A), no att sites (B), or a single attR (C). (D–F) The distributions (±s.e.) of effective tether lengths (and Gaussian fits) compiled from all experiments for attL-containing molecules (D), non-att DNA molecules (E), or attR-containing DNA molecules (F). The measurement for each type of molecule was calculated as the mean of the 10.5 s of tether length data: commencing at t=0 min (before protein addition; black squares), commencing at t=7.5 min (after IHF and Xis addition; red circles), or commencing at t=7.5 min (after wild-type Int, Xis, and IHF addition; blue triangles). Download figure Download PowerPoint Every attL DNA molecule observed adopted its final, shortened tether length within the 20 s mixing time in which no measurements could be made owing to the solution flow used to introduce the proteins. Every molecule remained at its final length for the duration of recording (20–60 min), even in experiments in which free IHF, Int, and Xis were removed from the chamber by buffer flow. These results show that complex formation is rapid (with an apparent first-order rate constant of >3.0 min−1) and is essentially irreversible under these reaction conditions. In a similar manner, we looked for the formation of specific complexes on a DNA containing only a single attR site (overlap region centered 290 bp from one end). Like attL, the attR sequence used here has a single IHF binding site (Figure 1B) and behavior of this DNA in the presence of IHF and Xis was identical to that seen with attL (data not shown): apparent tether lengths of all molecules decreased by 241±7 bp during the mixing time (Figure 2F, compare black and red curves). The addition of Xis alone or in conjunction with IHF did not result in any additional apparent attR shortening (data not shown). When all three proteins were added, the attR DNA shortened by an additional 95 bp, to a final effective tether length 336±9 bp shorter than the original 1943 bp length (Figure 2C and F; compare black and blue curves in Figure 2F). Other characteristics of the attR complexes were identical to attL complexes: they formed rapidly (>3.0 min−1), their dissociation was never observed within the 60 min time of measurement (dissociation rate constant <0.017 min−1), they formed equally well with cleavage-incompetent IntK235A or IntH308L (data not shown), and they were disrupted by SDS. For both attL and attR, full complex formation depended upon the presence of IHF; neither Int nor Xis, individually or together, produced detectable shortening. Complex assembly on attL+attR DNA Having established that nucleoprotein complexes form independently on attL and attR, we examined complex formation on DNA molecules containing both attL and attR in their canonical orientation for excisive recombination and separated by 1353 bp (Figure 1B, top). Examples of single-molecule traces with this substrate upon addition of Int, IHF, and Xis are shown in Figure 3A and B. In 89 of the 94 molecules analyzed, the effective length decreased by 873±12 bp during the mixing time (Figure 3C). This reduction corresponds roughly to the sum of those measured with attL and attR individually (779±18 bp). Like those complexes seen with a single attL or a single attR, the tether remained shortened unless challenged with SDS and shortening occurred even with cleavage-deficient Int mutant K235A or H308L. This decrease is too small to be caused by DNA looping (Finzi and Gelles, 1995) between attL and attR; it likely reflects independent formation of the Int-containing attL and attR complexes. Figure 3.Complex formation and recombination of single attL+attR-containing molecules. (A, B) Changes in the effective lengths of single attL+attR DNA molecules in response to the addition of recombination proteins Int, Xis, and IHF. (A) Example of a molecule that failed to synapse within the duration of observation. (B) Example of a molecule that synapsed and went on to recombine. The three proteins or the SDS challenge were added at the times indicated by dashed lines. (C–F) Distributions (±s.e.) of effective tether lengths of attL+attR molecules. In (D), t=7.5 min is used because no additional synaptic complexes form after that time. In (E) and (F), the measurement was immediately preceded by addition of SDS at t=20 or 60 min, respectively. (G) Distribution of presynaptic complex lifetimes for attL+attR molecules that went on to form recombinant product. The lifetime τ was determined by fitting with a scaled exponential probability function (see Materials and methods) and is the inverse of the synapsis rate constant. Download figure Download PowerPoint Synapsis of att-site complexes If the DNA between the attL and attR sites is looped out or excised, the effective tether length is expected to be ⩽590 bp (Figure 1B). (If the DNA arms exit from a looped complex at an angle <180°, the effective tether length will be shorter than the summed length of the flanking DNA.) A further reduction in effective length (to 555±12 bp) was observed in 53% of the attL+attR molecules after the formation of att-site complexes (Figure 3B and D). (For the remaining 47%, the trace looked like that shown in Figure 3A; the molecules failed to synapse and their length distributions were similar at 7.5 min (Figure 3F) and just before SDS addition at 60 min (data not shown). The second shortening is likely caused by one or more of three key events that occur sequentially in recombination (Figure 1A): (a) association of the independent attL and attR complexes to form a non-covalent synaptic complex, (b) exchange of the first pair of DNA strands to generate a covalent four-way (Holliday) junction, or (c) resolution of the Holliday junction by a second pair of DNA strand exchanges to generate completed recombinant molecules. To help determine which of these events had occurred, buffer containing 0.2% SDS was added to one set of 38 attL+attR molecules at 20 min after protein addition. All but two of the 19 molecules that had shortened to ∼550 bp returned to their original effective length of 1943 bp (Figure 3E). Thus, after 20 min reaction, 95% of the molecules that had synapsed had not yet formed stable Holliday junction or recombinant products, neither of which would be disrupted by SDS (Figure 1C). In contrast, when SDS was added to the second set of samples 60 min after addition of proteins, 100% of the 31 attL+attR DNAs that had synapsed retained their ∼550 bp length, indicating that by this time all of these molecules were either Holliday junctions or recombinant products (Figure 3B and F). In the molecules that synapsed, the time intervals between addition of proteins and the shortening to ∼550 bp were exponentially distributed (Figure 3G), consistent with a single rate-limiting step (rate constant 1.0 min−1) for synapsis. Thus, the attL and attR nucleoprotein complexes that become competent for synapsis do so faster than we can measure, probably within the 20 s period during which the proteins are introduced. Recombination To distinguish between Holliday junctions and recombinant products, we performed additional experiments using DNA in which the attR orientation was inverted with respect to attL. Recombination of this attLinvattR substrate inverts (rather than deletes) the intervening 1353 bp DNA segment leaving the overall DNA length unaltered (Figure 1B). This allows differentiation of long tether length recombinant products from short tether length Holliday junction. The presence of Xis inhibits any further recombination of the attP- and attB-containing inversion product (Abremski and Gottesman, 1982). Recombination reactions with inverted or directly repeated att sites are expected to proceed with the same kinetics (Craig and Nash, 1983) and through the same intermediates (Nash and Pollock, 1983; Pollock and Nash, 1983). Consistent with this expectation, attLinvattR molecules to which Int, IHF, and Xis were added appeared similar to presynaptic and synaptic complexes observed on attL+attR molecules (see Figure 4A). That is to say, presynaptic and synaptic complexes form with the same effective tether lengths and kinetics on attLinvattR and attL+attR DNA (compare Figure 4B and C with 3G and D). When SDS was added to attLinvattR samples after 60 min reaction time, all 23 of the total attLinvattR molecules that had synapsed returned to their original 1943 bp length (Figure 4D). This implies that none of these molecules exist as Holliday junction (effective tether length ⩽590 bp) after 60 min reaction. Taken together with the results from attL+attR substrates, these data suggest that all synapsed complexes complete recombination within 60 min. Consistent with these interpretations, the fraction of single molecules completing excision at 20 and 60 min is similar to that measured by gel electrophoresis for DNA free in solution under similar conditions (data not shown). Figure 4.Kinetics of recombination examined with an inverted repeat substrate. (A) Changes in the effective lengths of a single DNA molecule with the attL and attR orientated as inverted repeats (attLinvattR) in response to the addition of recombination proteins Int, Xis, and IHF. The three proteins or the SDS challenge were added at the times indicated by dashed lines. SDS addition to this substrate at 60 min yields a recombination product identical in size to the substrate (but with the inverted DNA between att sites) rather than an ∼590 bp Holliday junction. (B) Distribution of presynaptic complex lifetimes for attLinvattR molecules that went on to synapse. The lifetime τ was determined by fitting with a scaled exponential probability function (see Materials and methods) and is the inverse of the synapsis rate constant. (C, D) The distributions of effective tether lengths of all attLinvattR molecules at t=7.5 min (after the addition of Int, IHF, and Xis; C) or t=60 min (after SDS addition; D). Download figure Download PowerPoint DNA cleavage To measure the forward and reverse rates of synaptic complex formation without the complication of covalently trapped intermediates, we performed experiments with cleavage-incompetent Int mutants. When IntK235A (Figure 5A) or IntH308L (data not shown) was added with Xis and IHF to attL+attR substrate, synaptic complexes formed with the same efficiency (∼50%), rate (compare Figure 5B and 3G), and apparent tether length as those formed with wild-type Int. However, unlike the wild-type complexes, formation of mutant synaptic complexes was reversible: the complexes dissociate with an apparent rate constant of 0.9 min−1 (Figure 5C), compared to wild-type synaptic complex dissociation, which was never observed within 60 min (k<0.017 min−1). We conclude that although synaptic complexes form rapidly, they are kinetically unstable unless trapped by a subsequent DNA cleavage step. Figure 5.Unstable synaptic complexes form with cleavage-deficient Int mutants. (A) Changes in the effective lengths of single attL+attR molecules in response to the addition of recombination proteins IntK235A, Xis, and IHF. (B, C) Lifetime distributions from all single-molecule records after the addition of IntK235A, Xis, and IHF to attL+attR molecules: lifetimes of (B) initial presynaptic and (C) synaptic complexes formed with IntK235A. The lifetime τ for each distribution was determined by fitting to a scaled exponential probability function. The reciprocal of τ is the apparent rate constant for synapsis of IntK235A-containing presynaptic complexes (B) or the apparent rate constant for desynapsis of IntK235A-containing synaptic complexes (C). (D) Lifetimes of the desynapsed population formed after IntK235A-mediated synapsis (e.g., 11–26 min in panel A). The parameters τ1, τ2, and A were determined by fitting to a scaled biexponential probability function and determine the rate constants for resynapsis (see Discussion). Download figure Download PowerPoint Comprehensive reaction pathway The single-molecule experiments reported here delineate the kinetics and pathway of the excision reaction from start to finish (Figure 6). Nucleoprotein complex formation, synapsis, and DNA cleavage are rapid relative to the formation of a stable Holliday junction. Although DNA cleavage is not strictly required for synaptic complex formation, it stabilizes the synaptic complex. It is striking that virtually every observed cleavage-stabilized synaptic complex infallibly produced recombinant products. Figure 6.Mechanism of bacteriophage λ excision. The specified apparent first-order rate constants are the lower limits for reactions at 60 nM Int, 6 nM IHF, and 250 nM Xis. All reactions within brackets are completed within the mixing time of 20 s and, therefore, have lower rate limits of 1/20 s=3.0 min−1. Gray arrows denote processes that were not observed over the 60 min recording time and, therefore, have rate constants <∼0.017 min−1. Abortive complexes could arise from any of the species within brackets. Covalent phosphotyrosine linkages (stars) resulting from DNA cleavage are likely to occur in attL before synapsis (not shown) and in attR following synapsis (Nash and Robertson, 1989). Download figure Download PowerPoint One implication of our kinetic model is that DNA cleavage intermediates covalently bound to Int (e.g., cleavage-stabilized synaptic complex; Figure 6) should be trapped in ensemble biochemical experiments by quenching the reaction with SDS between ∼2 and 20 min after protein addition. However, this was not observed in earlier studies; it was only through the use of suicide substrates or peptide inhibitors that significant amounts of covalent intermediate could be detected (Kitts and Nash, 1987, 1988; Nunes-Düby et al, 1987; Pargellis et al, 1988; Burgin Jr et al, 1995; Cassell et al, 2000). One explanation for the inability to detect covalent complexes is that SDS fails to quench Int ligation activity fast enough to prevent reformation of the initial phosphodiester bonds. We have demonstrated that this is the case in an adaptation of a previously described ligation assay (see Supplementary data; Pan and Sadowski, 1992). Discussion Int distribution among presynaptic complexes The results presented in this investigation suggest that excisive synapsis occurs between two Int-containing presynaptic complexes that independently assemble on both attL and attR. Addition of Int to DNAs containing either an attL or an attR results in complexes differing from those assembled with IHF and Xis alone (compare blue and red curves in Figure 2D for attL; Figure 2F for attR). A model in which an attL complex containing 1–3 Int protomers synapses with an attR complex containing 1–3 Int protomers to form an active tetramer fits published data (Bauer et al, 1986; Nunes-Düby et al, 1989; Kim et al, 1990; Numrych et al, 1990; Kim and Landy, 1992) and the experiments reported here. However, owing to the limited precision of the effective DNA length measurements," @default.
• W2123381445 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2123381445 creator A5035762581 @default.
• W2123381445 creator A5036055279 @default.
• W2123381445 creator A5044808990 @default.
• W2123381445 date "2006-09-14" @default.
• W2123381445 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2123381445 title "Viewing single λ site-specific recombination events from start to finish" @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1485658846 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1486930785 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1492672213 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1527452930 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1540688842 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1542133388 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1555535097 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1578419118 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1578950175 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1580221530 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1590546489 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1599116685 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1599424322 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1762856237 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1803410052 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1893351980 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W192741104 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1970258574 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1970480018 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1970611074 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1972750207 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1973761362 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1974152748 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1984846896 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W1985903030 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2000491222 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2003133442 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2004996851 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2007678783 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2009355359 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2010788965 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2019635509 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2019917384 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2022561166 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2029525578 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2041988768 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2045060152 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2047415109 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2052221476 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2059565246 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2060173479 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2064040206 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2068514032 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2071829103 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2083301155 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2083584270 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2084599573 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2088917620 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2089219339 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2089433236 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2104975387 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2120412445 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2124408385 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2132422309 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2132533277 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2160175948 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2161620968 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2163326745 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2168932899 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2169143108 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2170409615 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2172258431 @default.
• W2123381445 cites W2144391561 @default.
• W2123381445 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601325" @default.
• W2123381445 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1590000" @default.
• W2123381445 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16977316" @default.
• W2123381445 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2123381445 type Work @default.
• W2123381445 sameAs 2123381445 @default.
• W2123381445 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452012 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452013 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452014 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452015 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452016 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452017 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452018 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452019 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452020 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452022 @default.
• W2123381445 countsByYear W21233814452023 @default.
• W2123381445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2123381445 hasAuthorship W2123381445A5035762581 @default.
• W2123381445 hasAuthorship W2123381445A5036055279 @default.
• W2123381445 hasAuthorship W2123381445A5044808990 @default.
• W2123381445 hasBestOaLocation W21233814452 @default.
• W2123381445 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2123381445 hasConcept C156695909 @default.
• W2123381445 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2123381445 hasConcept C78458016 @default.

• next