Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2123530663> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2123530663 abstract "Background Lung edema may complicate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. Objectives The aim of this review was to assess the risks and benefits of diuretic administration in preterm infants with RDS. Search methods The standard search method of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. These searches were updated in April 2003, March 2007, January 2011. In addition, the abstract books of the American Thoracic Society and Society for Pediatric Research were searched. MEDLINE and CENTRAL search was conducted using the keyword Respiratory Distress Syndrome alone, to find studies of medications recently classified as diuretics, such as theophylline. In addition, EMBASE, controlled‐trials.com and clinicaltrials.gov searches were completed in January 2011. MEDLINE search updated to August 2011. Selection criteria Trials were included in which preterm infants with RDS and less than five days of age were randomly allocated to diuretic administration. Of those trials, studies were only included in which at least one of the following outcomes measures was evaluated: mortality, patent ductus arteriosus, hypovolemic shock, intraventricular hemorrhage, renal failure, duration of oxygen supplementation, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen supplementation at 28 days of life, oxygen supplementation at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (gestational age + postnatal age), length of stay, number of rehospitalizations during the first year of life, and neurodevelopmental outcome. Data collection and analysis The standard method for the Cochrane Collaboration, which is described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, was used. Two investigators extracted, assessed and coded separately all data for each study. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion. Main results Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Six studies using furosemide were done before the current era of prenatal steroids, surfactant and fluid restriction. Furosemide administration had no long‐term benefits. Furosemide‐induced transient improvement in pulmonary function did not outweigh an increased risk for patent ductus arteriosus and for hemodynamic instability. In one recent study, theophylline had no long‐term benefits. Theophylline significantly decreased the risk of oligoanuria and transiently increased renal function, but did not significantly affect renal function at discharge or other outcomes. Authors' conclusions There are no data to support routine administration of furosemide in preterm infants with RDS. Elective administration of furosemide to any patient with RDS should be carefully weighed against the risk of precipitating hypovolemia or developing a symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. There are not enough data to support routine administration of low‐dose theophylline in preterm infants with RDS." @default.
- W2123530663 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2123530663 creator A5036299725 @default.
- W2123530663 creator A5054574051 @default.
- W2123530663 creator A5054630381 @default.
- W2123530663 date "2011-12-07" @default.
- W2123530663 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2123530663 title "Diuretics for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants" @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1483995133 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1589790913 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1648623379 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1967804002 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1972804964 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1975443357 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1978006650 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W1984557526 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2005674803 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2008612306 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2013859242 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2014409783 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2021551288 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2027742191 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2027930612 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2030454351 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2033451677 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2034543190 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2035081219 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2035754158 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2036997343 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2041172698 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2042836038 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2044474912 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2048838751 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2054109122 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2054973830 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2055361216 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2057070985 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2057733602 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2061831144 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2067170495 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2067911951 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2069151214 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2076857777 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2079030680 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2082588868 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2086591114 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2091456718 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2091790079 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2095068652 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2111071070 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2115514127 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2124049139 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2133946532 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2139427336 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2154929896 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2159534192 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2162067630 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2313121787 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2313811686 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2314487182 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2337751314 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2340304935 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W2399484184 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W4206087178 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W4232938574 @default.
- W2123530663 cites W4298375131 @default.
- W2123530663 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001454.pub3" @default.
- W2123530663 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7055205" @default.
- W2123530663 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22161366" @default.
- W2123530663 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2123530663 type Work @default.
- W2123530663 sameAs 2123530663 @default.
- W2123530663 citedByCount "27" @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632012 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632013 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632016 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632017 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632018 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632019 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632021 @default.
- W2123530663 countsByYear W21235306632022 @default.
- W2123530663 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2123530663 hasAuthorship W2123530663A5036299725 @default.
- W2123530663 hasAuthorship W2123530663A5054574051 @default.
- W2123530663 hasAuthorship W2123530663A5054630381 @default.
- W2123530663 hasBestOaLocation W21235306632 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C141983124 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C2780123866 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2123530663 hasConcept C54355233 @default.