FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2123883670> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2123883670 endingPage "450" @default.
• W2123883670 startingPage "440" @default.
• W2123883670 abstract "Article1 February 2002free access Transvection effects involving DNA methylation during meiosis in the mouse Minoo Rassoulzadegan Minoo Rassoulzadegan Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France Search for more papers by this author Marc Magliano Marc Magliano Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France Search for more papers by this author François Cuzin Corresponding Author François Cuzin Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France Search for more papers by this author Minoo Rassoulzadegan Minoo Rassoulzadegan Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France Search for more papers by this author Marc Magliano Marc Magliano Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France Search for more papers by this author François Cuzin Corresponding Author François Cuzin Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France Search for more papers by this author Author Information Minoo Rassoulzadegan1, Marc Magliano1 and François Cuzin 1 1Unité 470 de l'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2002)21:440-450https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.3.440 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info High efficiencies of recombination between LoxP elements were initially recorded when the Cre recombinase was expressed in meiotic spermatocytes. However, it was unexpectedly found that LoxP recombination fell to very low values at the second generation of mice expressing Cre during meiosis. The inability of the LoxP elements to serve as recombination substrates was correlated with cytosine methylation, initially in LoxP and transgene sequences, but later extending for distances of at least several kilobases into chromosomal sequences. It also affected the allelic locus, implying a transfer of structural information between alleles similar to the transvection phenomenon described in Drosophila. Once initiated following Cre–LoxP interaction, neither cis-extension nor transvection of the methylated state required the continuous expression of Cre, as they occurred both in germinal and somatic cells and in the fraction of the offspring that had not inherited the Sycp1-Cre transgene. Therefore, these processes depend on a physiological mechanism of establishment and extension of an epigenetic state, for which they provide an experimental model. Introduction Epigenetic modifications are changes in the chromatin structure which result either in the activation or repression of defined regions of the genome without modifying (mutating) the primary nucleotide sequence. An ever increasing number of such modifications are under study in various organisms. In mammals, the two best studied cases, namely the inactivation of one of the X chromosomes in the female and the differential expression of imprinted loci in the paternal and maternal genomes, are both of critical importance in development (for reviews see Henikoff and Comai, 1998; Surani, 1998; Tilghman, 1999; Wolffe and Matzke, 1999). However, our knowledge of the mechanisms by which an epigenetic change is created remains rudimentary. An interesting situation has been described in Drosophila, fungi and higher plants in which an epigenetic modification is induced in one allele when the other one is itself modified. Several instances of this type of interallelic communication have been reported under the denominations of transvection and paramutation. Initially identified in studies of the bithorax complex (Lewis, 1954), transvection effects leading to modifications of gene expression and regulation were subsequently demonstrated in a number of Drosophila genes (for review see Pirrotta, 1999) and in the fungus Neurospora crassa (Aramayo and Metzenberg, 1996). The term paramutation has been used to describe situations in plants in which the phenotype corresponding to a ‘paramutable’ allele is similarly modified due to an interaction with a ‘paramutagenic’ one, the change being maintained after meiotic segregation (Hollick et al., 1997). These effects imply a physical interaction between either adjacent genes or between synapsed alleles at the pachytene stage of meiosis and, when it is the case, in somatic cells (Henikoff and Comai, 1998). A tantalizing question has been whether the same mechanisms are also at work in mammalian genomes, but no clear answer has yet been given. Our results demonstrate a transvection effect in the mouse. It involves the spreading through the genome of an epigenetic modification: the 5′ methylation of cytosine residues in DNA. Cytosine methylation is one of the most extensively documented modifications in mammalian genomes. Frequently, although not in all cases, it corresponds to a state of transcriptional repression. A complex family of DNA methyltransferases has been identified, whose prototype is the group of proteins encoded at the Dnmt1 locus of the mouse (Mertineit et al., 1998). The fact that homozygous Dnmt1−/− mutants are early lethals is one of the most striking pieces of evidence for an important role in mammalian development (Li et al., 1992). The methylation state of a gene is often modified during development and during gametogenesis, but little is known of the controls responsible for the selective de novo addition (or removal) of methyl groups. Whether or not the possibility of transvection has to be taken into account therefore appears as a relevant question. In the course of our analysis into the site-specific recombination between LoxP sequences catalyzed by the Cre recombinase expressed at the pachytene stage of meiosis from the stage-specific Sycp1 promoter (Vidal et al., 1998), we demonstrated methylation of cytosines within the LoxP sequences, dependent on Cre expression and inhibiting further recombination. This effect appears to be unique to the meiotic cells, as it has never been described in the numerous studies using Cre–LoxP recombination as a genetic engineering tool either in the somatic tissues of a transgenic mouse or in embryonic stem (ES) cells (for review see Porter, 1998). We then observed that, once initiated during gametogenesis, the methylated state was extended in the following generations from the LoxP sequence into the surrounding chromosomal sequences. These studies were conducted in parallel on two independent target loci: a LoxP insert in the Rxrα locus and one of the widely used ‘Cre monitor’ mouse strains carrying a stop cassette surrounded by LoxP elements (‘floxed’; Mao et al., 1999; Soriano, 1999) in the ROSA26 locus. While the initiation of methylation clearly resulted from a non-physiological situation created in the Sycp1-Cre transgenic males, its extension subsequently occurred in somatic tissues, which do not express the Cre transgene. Moreover, it followed the same pattern in the Cre+ and Cre− progenies of hemizygous parents. Therefore, the spreading of this epigenetic mark appears to result from a cellular mechanism and determining its rules should be informative. One striking observation in this respect was the induction of a methylated state in allelic loci that have not been exposed to the recombinase. Transvection thus appears to occur in the mouse, possibly dependent on chromosome synapsis during meiosis. Results Expression of the Cre recombinase in pachytene spermatocytes: efficient recombination of LoxP sites during the first meiosis followed by complete inhibition in the following generations Recombination between LoxP sequences mediated by the Cre recombinase is of general use as a tool to delete floxed regions in mammalian cells (Sauer and Henderson, 1989). Targeted mutations can in this way be created in vivo, in animals where Cre expression is directed by the appropriate promoter–enhancer systems and/or by hormonal induction of a recombinase–receptor fusion protein (Brocard et al., 1997 and references therein). In a number of the transgenic mouse strains expressing Cre in various somatic tissues described in the literature, recombination frequencies were stably maintained generation after generation. In order to extend this technology to the differentiating germ cells, we generated transgenic animals in which Cre expression was directed by a promoter fragment from the Sycp1 gene exclusively active at the leptotene to early pachytene stages of the male meiosis (Sage et al., 1999). Double transgenic mice were generated that carried both the Sycp1-Cre transgene and the Cre reporter locus ROSA26flox (Mao et al., 1999). Expression of the β-galactosidase coding sequence in ROSA26flox (βgeo fused gene) depends on the prior excision of a floxed stop cassette and can be easily detected, even in a minor fraction of the germ cells, by x-gal assays on testis sections. As shown in Figure 1, results appeared in complete agreement with data previously obtained with other floxed loci (Vidal et al., 1998). In the testes of Cre+ males generated by Sycp1-Cre;Rosa26wt/wt females mated with ROSA26flox/flox males, the stop cassette was excised with high efficiency in pachytene spermatocytes and their derivatives (meiosis II and haploid stages), thus generating the ROSA26del genotype and a β-galactosidase-positive phenotype. As expected from the strict specificity of the promoter, all somatic tissues tested were negative (not shown). Figure 1.Efficient excision of a floxed cassette in the testis of a male who inherited the Sycp1-Cre transgene. (A) Left: x-gal staining of a section of an adult (4 months) ROSA26 male mouse showing β-galactosidase expression at all stages of germinal differentiation. Right: no expression is detectable in a male of the same age carrying the floxed locus (ROSA26flox). (B) The indicated cross generated heterozygous ROSA26flox/Rosa26wt;Sycp1-Cre males. x-gal staining shows extensive β-galactosidase accumulation in testicular germ cells starting at the pachytene stage (note that the earliest stages at the periphery of the tubule remain negative), demonstrating excision of the floxed cassette generating the ROSA26del recombined allele. Download figure Download PowerPoint Therefore, it was surprising to observe a sharp decrease in efficiency in the progeny of these Sycp1-Cre males (Figure 2), contrasting with the high frequency of recombination in the progenitors. In these experiments, the locus deleted at the previous generation, with only one remaining LoxP site, had been associated by the appropriate crosses with the original floxed allele (ROSA26del/flox genotype). In spite of the fact that the Sycp1-Cre transgene was maintained, the newly introduced floxed region did not undergo excision during spermatogenesis. Several possible explanations were taken into consideration. We considered the possibility of a loss of Cre expression during successive germ line passages. Northern blot analysis was performed on testis RNA in a series of Sycp1-Cre males, in which excision of the floxed region had taken place, and in the recombination-deficient animals (‘Generation#3’ in Figure 2). Low and variable levels of Cre RNA were detected, as expected from the relatively low strength of the Sycp1 promoter and the small number of expressing cells in the testis, but without any significant difference between males who had or had not recombined (Figure 3). As the levels of recombinase expression appeared to be unchanged in males in which recombination did not take place, we considered the alternative possibility of an epigenetic modification of the LoxP sites, with methylation of cytosine residues as an obvious candidate. Figure 2.The floxed cassette is not excised after propagation for more than one generation of the Sycp1-Cre transgene. Same experiment as in Figure 1, but the floxed ROSA26 locus was transferred to a third generation progeny in one of the Sycp1-Cre;ROSA26 families. Indicated in the table are the numbers of β-galactosidase-expressing mice in the male progeny (ROSA26del) and, among the negative phenotypes, the wild-type and floxed genotypes distinguished by PCR analysis. Note that meiosis in the male, indicated as Generation #1, was the first exposure of the floxed locus to the recombinase. The total number of pups analyzed is indicated, with the number of litters shown in parentheses. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 3.Expression of the Cre transgene in males that have not excised the floxed cassette. Northern blot analysis of testis RNA of males designated as generation #1 (lanes 1–6) and generation #3 (lanes 7–13) in the experiment described in Figure 2. Hybridization was performed with a Cre probe amplified from pBS185 DNA with primers Cre1 and Cre2 and a GAPDH probe as a control (Lopez et al., 1999). Download figure Download PowerPoint LoxP sites undergo methylation after exposure to the Cre recombinase during meiosis Although the effect of cytosine methylation on the recombination of LoxP elements has not been previously documented, mutation of two cytosines in the sequence has been found to decrease, to a large extent, recombinase binding (Hartung and Kisters-Woike, 1998). Cytosine methylation was demonstrated at these two CpG sites in the LoxP elements of Sycp1-Cre;ROSA26del males by using bisulfite modification and PCR amplification for detection of modified cytosine residues (Figure 4). Methylation affected the two CpG residues in the LoxP sequence, but, interestingly, was also found in the surrounding chromosomal sequences and not only in CpG but also in CpT and CpA dinucleotides (see also Figure 7). Although recently described in ES cells (Ramsahoye et al., 2000), non-CpG methylation is not considered as usual. In this case, it was clearly confirmed on a total of 24 amplified sequences after bisulfite treatment performed on two males of the same generation. At the first generation in which LoxP recombination has been efficient (Generation #1 in Figure 2), distinct methylation patterns were observed in PCR clones derived from testis DNA in several animals of the same generation [Figure 4, 2.1(b) and 2.2(b)]. In the following generation, as one would have expected, a homogeneous pattern was observed in the somatic (tail) DNA of the progeny [in a total of 36 independent sequences established on six animals; Figure 4, 3(b) and 4(b)]. Figure 4.Cytosine methylation in the LoxP elements of the ROSA26flox locus. Bisulfite treatment and subsequent PCR amplification and sequencing (Olek et al., 1996) were performed to determine the extent of cytosine methylation. Methylated cytosines are detected as cytosines (indicated as bold underlined characters) and the unmethylated bases as thymine nucleotides. u, untreated DNA; b, bisulfite-treated DNA. Sequence 1 shows amplification from testis DNA of a ROSA26 mouse without the Cre transgene (sequences identical in 12 amplified clones per animal and in two animals); sequences 2.1 and 2.2 are different sequences obtained from the ROSA26del testis of Rosa26wt/ROSA26flox male (generation #1 in Figure 2, the two sequences being found among 12 amplified clones for three animals of the same generation), and sequences 3 and 4 show amplification from the somatic (tail) DNA of two groups of three males (six strands sequenced for each animal all showing the same pattern). Amplification was performed with primers Rosa26–1S, 2S, 1R and Rosa26–1S, 2S, ch3R (see Materials and methods). Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 5.Cytosine methylation in the LoxP element of RxrαAF1 and surrounding sequences. Bisulfite treatment and subsequent PCR amplification and sequencing were performed as shown in Figure 4 (u, untreated; b, bisulfite treated). Amplification was performed with primers 285S, 370S and 491R. (A) Testis DNA of heterozygous AF1/+ animals. Sequences 1 and 2, found in equivalent numbers, correspond, respectively, to the wild-type and mutant allele. Upper case, chromosomal sequence; lower case, transgene sequence; LoxP sequence in bold. The results shown were identical in 12 clones sequenced per animal (five animals). (B) Sequence 3 was established from the testis DNA of first generation heterozygotes (Figure 8, top) and sequence 4 from the tail DNA at the following generation. In each case, sequences were identical in 12 clones independently amplified from four distinct males of the same generation. (C) Same analysis performed on Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1/AF1 homozygotes at the following generation. Sequence 5, tail DNA; sequence 6, testis DNA. Identical sequences in 12 clones amplified from each one of three males of the same generation. Note that methylation extends into chromosomal sequences. Download figure Download PowerPoint We directly confirmed that CpG methylation in LoxP inhibits Cre recombination. The recombinase was transiently expressed in cultured fibroblasts co-transfected with a Cre expression vector driven by the cytomegalovirus (CMV) early promoter and with a floxed target either unmethylated or methylated in vitro by the SssI CpG methyltransferase. As shown in Figure 5, 72 h after transfection, excision of the floxed DNA was observed only in cells transfected with the unmethylated DNA samples. Figure 6.The AF1 region of Rxrα. Top: an out-of-scale map of the regions encompassing introns 1–4 and 7–10. The two regions are ∼16 kb apart. The 5′ region is mutated in RxrαAF1 by a complete deletion of intron 2 fusing exons 2 and 3, and the insertion of a single LoxP site in intron 3. E, EcoRI restriction sites. Bottom: Southern blot analysis after EcoRI cleavage and hybridization with the Rxrα5′ probe. Lane 1, wild type; lane 2, RxrαAF1/+. Download figure Download PowerPoint LoxP methylation in meiotic cells expressing Cre is not unique to the ROSA26 genotype Inhibition of the recombination process after a first exposure to the recombinase could have resulted from some abnormal structure of the target ROSA26 locus, created by the integration of an exon-trapping vector into an unknown locus (Friedrich and Soriano, 1991). We therefore checked whether similar observations could be made on a better defined genetic structure, with a minimal deviation from the wild-type locus, such as the AF1 mutant of the Rxrα locus (Figure 6). Besides a deletion of intron 2, RxrαAF1 contains a single LoxP site in the third intron of the gene, introduced by homologous recombination followed by excision of a LoxP–neo–LoxP cassette by Cre recombination in ES cells (D.Metzger and P.Chambon, personal communication). Both heterozygous and homozygous AF1 mutants develop normally and are fully viable. Figure 7.Cytosine methylation of LoxP inhibits Cre recombination. Actively growing STO cells were transfected with a mixture of 1 μg of pBS185 (Cre expression vector) and 0.2 μg of pβgeo–LoxP plasmid DNA. DNA was prepared 72 h after transfection. PCR amplification of a 560 bp fragment with primers Neo1 and Neo2 (1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 60°C, 15 s at 72°C, 25 cycles) was performed as a control on undiluted extracts. PCR analysis with primers PBS1 and PBS2 (1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 56°C, 15 s at 72°C, 30 cycles) was then performed to amplify a fragment of 81 bp diagnostic of the excision of the floxed βgeo region, revealed by hybridization with LoxP oligonucleotide probe (labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32P]ATP). Experiments were performed in parallel with βgeo-LoxP DNA methylated in vitro by SssI (lane 2) and with the unmethylated DNA (lane 1). Amplification of the diagnostic Pbs1–Pbs2 fragment was performed on a 1:100 dilution of the extract in the case of unmethylated DNA (lane 1) and on undiluted extract in the case of methylated DNA (lane 2). Note that the absence of the amplified Pbs1–Pbs2 fragment in lane 2 provides a control for the absence of the recombined structure in the starting construct. Download figure Download PowerPoint Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1 males were generated and mated with RxrαAF1/AF1 females to obtain successive generations of mutant males either with or without the Sycp1-Cre transgene. When the methylation status of the LoxP and surrounding sequences was analyzed by the bisulfite assay, it was again found that methylation of cytosines, initiated within the LoxP sequence, was extending at the second generation into the surrounding chromosomal region (Figure 7). Spreading of the methylated state: resistance to EcoRI cleavage in RxrαAF1 sequences as a marker Results described so far indicate that the LoxP sequences and the neighboring DNA sequences undergo methylation starting at the first generation at which the recombinase is expressed in the male germ line. At this stage, the extent of methylation is still limited (Figure 7). Extension of the modified state was then observed starting at the second generation. The finding that methylation-sensitive restriction sites, up to at least 2 kb away from the LoxP site in the surrounding chromosomal region, were inactivated provided useful markers to measure precisely how the methylated state is spreading. A major change in the Southern blot profile of the AF1 region was observed in routine checks performed at successive generations (Figure 8). EcoRI cleavage generated a 4.1 kb fragment from the region of RxrαAF1, which contains the LoxP element that was detected on Southern blots by the Rxrα5′ probe (Figure 6). Cleavage of the wild-type locus yields an 8.4 kb fragment that hybridizes with the same probe. When a transgenic Sycp1-Cre male was mated with a heterozygous Rxrα+/AF1 female, the distribution of the 4.1 and 8.4 kb fragments in the first generation, confirmed by PCR genotyping, showed the expected Mendelian distribution with the AF1 allele present in one half of the offspring. In the next generation (brother–sister crosses), the expected distribution of homozygous and heterozygous genotypes was again demonstrated by PCR analysis. However, the 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment could not be detected by Southern blot hybridization with the same probe. Only the wild-type-derived 8.4 kb fragment was detected from +/AF1 DNA and no band at all was seen in the lanes corresponding to the AF1/AF1 homozygotes, whereas the Rxrα3′ probe, covering the region from exon 8 to intron 10, 15 kb downstream of the LoxP site, still identified the expected 10 kb fragment on the same blots. The most likely interpretation of these results was that the EcoRI sites surrounding the LoxP element have been either lost or modified. In eukaryotic cells, as in bacteria, the endonuclease is sensitive to cytosine methylation (Brennan et al., 1986) and its inability to cut has been used as a marker to detect site-specific methylation (e.g. Kleymenova et al., 1998). In addition, restriction sites for the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease in the region recognized by the Rxrα5′ probe were converted into a cleavage-resistant form, still recognized by the methylation-insensitive MspI isoschizomer (data not shown). And the conclusion that disappearance of the 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment results from an epigenetic modification was confirmed by experiments performed on primary fibroblast cultures. Starting from embryos in which EcoRI did not cut in the AF1 region, blot analysis showed a fragment of the correct size reappearing at the second to third transfer of the cultures (data not shown). Once established, the methylated state appeared, on the other hand, to be fairly stable in the mouse, at least during three successive generations of breeding in the absence of the Cre transgene. Figure 8.The 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment spanning the LoxP sequence of the RxrαAF1 region is not detectable at the second generation following meiotic exposure to the Cre recombinase. Analysis of a litter of nine offspring (middle) generated by two double transgenic first generation Sycp1-Cre;Rxrα+/AF1 parents, both from the same litter of 12 (top). Southern blot analysis of the parents and their littermates (top) showed the presence of the 4.1 kb fragment derived from the AF1 mutant, together with the 8.4 kb EcoRI fragment characteristic of the wild-type locus. Bacterial vector sequences are included in the probe to reveal in addition the Sycp1-Cre transgene (8.0 kb fragment). PCR analysis (middle) conducted with primers RxrAF1-1 and -2 (located on both sides of the AF1 LoxP site) demonstrated the expected distribution of homozygous (2, 5 and 9) and heterozygous (1, 3, 4 and 7) genotypes. Southern blot analysis (bottom) detected the 10 kb fragment hybridizing with the Rxrα3′ probe. The Rxrα5′ probe detected the 8.4 kb fragment from the wild-type locus, but not the 4.1 kb fragment from the AF1 allele. Hybridization of a probe for the Cre gene (not shown) indicated inheritance of the transgene only by animals 5, 8 and 9. Insert: simplified scheme showing the relative positions of the restriction sites and probes within the locus. Download figure Download PowerPoint Spreading of the methylated state: cis extension in chromosomal sequences Disappearance of the 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment provided a marker of the methylated state in the Rxrα locus, in all cases strictly correlated with inactivation of the LoxP sites. Like LoxP methylation itself, it was seen only after prior exposure of the locus to the recombinase in meiotic cells. AF1 mice, which had not been derived from Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1 males, always showed the complete EcoRI profile, as well as Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1 females, which do not express the transgene (Sage et al., 1999), and their progeny. The modification was not dependent on continuous exposure to the recombinase, since it occurred to the same extent in the Cre+ and Cre− fractions of the progeny (Figure 8). Furthermore, it was observed to progress in somatic tissues during the development of a young mouse to an adult. One example illustrated in Figure 9 is that of two young Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1/+ mice in which the 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment characteristic of the unmethylated site was present in tail DNA prepared at the age of 3 weeks. When DNA was prepared from a second tail biopsy 3 months later, the fragment was not detectable anymore in either of the two mice, thus showing that methylation had progressed in the somatic DNA in the time elapsed. In the 4-month-old male parent, the 4.1 kb fragment was still present in tail DNA, again indicating that the methylated state was spreading only after an initial exposure to the recombinase during meiosis and was not related to aging per se. Figure 9.Somatic propagation of the methylated state. A first generation Sycp1-Cre;Rxrα+/AF1 male was mated with a wild-type female. PCR analysis with primers RxrAF1-1 and -2 and Southern genotyping with the Rxrα5′ probe were performed at 2 weeks on the tail DNA of two offspring. It showed the complete EcoRI pattern, including the 4.1 kb fragment encompassing the LoxP site. The same analysis performed 3 months later showed the same pattern of amplified fragments, but the 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment is no longer detected. Download figure Download PowerPoint Transfer of the methylated state to the allelic locus: a case of transvection in the mouse Propagation in trans of the methylated state to the allelic region of the homologous chromosome was demonstrated in RxrαAF1 using resistance to EcoRI cleavage as an assay of the methylated state. In the experiment shown in Figure 10, a first generation Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1/+ male with unmethylated EcoRI sites was crossed with a homozygous RxrαAF1/AF1 female. In the progeny, as shown in previous sections, the AF1 locus inherited from the mother was sensitive to EcoRI cleavage. Only half of the progeny inherited the Sycp1-Cre transgene and a Cre−;RxrαAF1/+ male was mated with the parental homozygous RxrαAF1/AF1 female. Surprisingly, the 4.1 kb EcoRI fragment was not found in the RxrαAF1/AF1 progeny, implying that the unmethylated allele from the mother has been converted into the methylated state in the absence of Cre. In other words, the LoxP-containing region, which had been initially modified following its exposure to Cre during meiosis, was able to induce modification of the allelic locus even though the recombinase was no longer present. Figure 10.Transvection of the methylated state mediated by the RxrαAF1 allele. A first generation Sycp1-Cre;RxrαAF1/+ male was mated with a homozygous RxrαAF1/AF1 female. A back-cross was performed to re-introduce one of the AF1 alleles from the mother into one of the Cre−;RxrαAF1/+ offspring. The EcoRI pattern with the Rxrα5′ probe indicated the modification of the restriction site in the alleles underlined, which have not been exposed to the recombinase. Download figure Download PowerPoint A similar instance of interallelic communication was demonstrated between ROSA26 loci. It can actually be noted that the result of the experiment shown in Figure 2, which first demonstrated a decrease in recombination efficiency, implies an effect of the ROSA26del allele in inducing methylation of ROSA26flox as early as the first generation in the presence of Sycp1-Cre. In other words, transvection was mediated by the del allele with o" @default.
• W2123883670 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2123883670 creator A5013198248 @default.
• W2123883670 creator A5024432079 @default.
• W2123883670 creator A5044562747 @default.
• W2123883670 date "2002-02-01" @default.
• W2123883670 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2123883670 title "Transvection effects involving DNA methylation during meiosis in the mouse" @default.
• W2123883670 cites W1482367175 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W1514297589 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W1768274470 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W1963784009 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W1976208541 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W1984014740 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2002373796 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2011968083 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2012242395 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2012299307 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2014721239 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2020777893 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2025030973 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2025784041 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2039019845 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2043203382 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2043864387 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2046069528 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2046241907 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2048938442 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2064838548 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2082693998 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2082964551 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2084013251 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2084101481 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2094948194 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2105324108 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2106734538 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2109881276 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2134812217 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2182746672 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2321928655 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W2323317510 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W4235854794 @default.
• W2123883670 cites W4294216491 @default.
• W2123883670 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.3.440" @default.
• W2123883670 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/125843" @default.
• W2123883670 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11823436" @default.
• W2123883670 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2123883670 type Work @default.
• W2123883670 sameAs 2123883670 @default.
• W2123883670 citedByCount "81" @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702012 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702013 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702014 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702015 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702016 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702017 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702018 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702019 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702020 @default.
• W2123883670 countsByYear W21238836702021 @default.
• W2123883670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2123883670 hasAuthorship W2123883670A5013198248 @default.
• W2123883670 hasAuthorship W2123883670A5024432079 @default.
• W2123883670 hasAuthorship W2123883670A5044562747 @default.
• W2123883670 hasBestOaLocation W21238836702 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C148196450 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C150194340 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C190727270 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C33288867 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C104317684 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C148196450 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C150194340 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C190727270 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C33288867 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C54355233 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C552990157 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C86803240 @default.
• W2123883670 hasConceptScore W2123883670C95444343 @default.
• W2123883670 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2123883670 hasLocation W21238836701 @default.
• W2123883670 hasLocation W21238836702 @default.
• W2123883670 hasLocation W21238836703 @default.
• W2123883670 hasLocation W21238836704 @default.
• W2123883670 hasOpenAccess W2123883670 @default.
• W2123883670 hasPrimaryLocation W21238836701 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W1994614579 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W2002128513 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W2019572309 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W2409017715 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W2417475048 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W2587769600 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W2902329290 @default.
• W2123883670 hasRelatedWork W3012096999 @default.

• next