FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2123974833> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2123974833 endingPage "195" @default.
• W2123974833 startingPage "187" @default.
• W2123974833 abstract "Background: More recently, robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) has emerged as an attractive alternative to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), and many studies have shown the feasibility and safety of RA. However, the short- and long-term outcomes of RA versus LA have not been adequately assessed, and the advantage over the laparoscopic approach has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RA versus LA by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature in the early experience. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, SCI/SSCI, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify prospective randomized controlled trials and retrospective observational studies that compared RA and LA and were published between January 2006 to the end of December 2012. Outcomes of interest included demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative variables, and complications. The meta-analysis was prepared in accordance with the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) statement. Results: Eight trials (232 cases and 297 controls) assessing RA versus LA were considered suitable for meta-analysis, including six prospective and two retrospective studies. There was a significant trend to choose patients for the performance of RA who were associated with a lower body mass index (weighted mean difference [WMD]=−2.78 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.00 to −2.55; P<.001) and higher incidence of previous surgery (odds ratio=1.59; 95% CI, 0.99–2.54; P=.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in any other of the demographic parameters. With regard to perioperative variables, although there was a significant difference in the operating time in favor of LA (WMD=17.52 minutes; 95% CI, 3.48–31.56; P=.01), patients having RA might benefit from significantly less blood loss (WMD=−19.00 mL; 95% CI, −34.58 to −3.41; P=.02) and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD=−0.35 day; 95% CI, −0.51 to −0.19; P<.001). There were no significant differences between RA and LA with regard to conversion rates and overall complications. Sensitivity analysis performed by two methods both showed a positive reversal in the operating time with the statistical significance removed compared with the original analysis. Conclusions: In the early experience, our data suggest that RA, compared with LA, may be a safe and feasible option associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay when performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients." @default.
• W2123974833 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5005836955 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5014243738 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5026506386 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5039671349 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5042673122 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5058780708 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5070458251 @default.
• W2123974833 creator A5079886307 @default.
• W2123974833 date "2015-03-01" @default.
• W2123974833 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2123974833 title "Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1220151980 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1537972189 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1540882346 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1963880008 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1972831329 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1980677301 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W1982771864 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2008659304 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2034711478 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2039961352 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2041380237 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2046108202 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2046152713 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2058400115 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2077767515 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2080327296 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2090345290 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2096034848 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2114152235 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2152793126 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2154542379 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2165785936 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2167130223 @default.
• W2123974833 cites W2318900567 @default.
• W2123974833 doi "https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0431" @default.
• W2123974833 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25763475" @default.
• W2123974833 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2123974833 type Work @default.
• W2123974833 sameAs 2123974833 @default.
• W2123974833 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332015 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332016 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332017 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332018 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332019 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332020 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332021 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332022 @default.
• W2123974833 countsByYear W21239748332023 @default.
• W2123974833 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5005836955 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5014243738 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5026506386 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5039671349 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5042673122 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5058780708 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5070458251 @default.
• W2123974833 hasAuthorship W2123974833A5079886307 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C120665830 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C121332964 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C126322002 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C141071460 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C156957248 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C167135981 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C168563851 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C17744445 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C199539241 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C23131810 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C2776478404 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C2779473830 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C31174226 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C44249647 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C61511704 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C71924100 @default.
• W2123974833 hasConceptScore W2123974833C95190672 @default.
• W2123974833 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2123974833 hasLocation W21239748331 @default.
• W2123974833 hasLocation W21239748332 @default.

• next