FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124002790> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2124002790 endingPage "40697" @default.
• W2124002790 startingPage "40693" @default.
• W2124002790 abstract "Apolipoprotein (apo) E stimulates the secretion of very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs) by an as yet unknown mechanism. Recently, a working mechanism for apoE was proposed (Twisk, J., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Tebon, A., Wang, L., Barrett, P. H., and Attie, A. D. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 521–532) in which apoE prevents the inhibitory action of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) by binding to it. We have first tested whether this newly described effect of the LDLr on VLDL secretion, obtained in vitro, is also observed in vivo. In LDLr knockout mice (LDLr−/−), the production of VLDL triglycerides and apoB was 30% higher than that in controls. Also the ratio of apoB100:apoB48 secretion was increased in the LDLr−/− mice. The composition of nascent VLDL was similar in both strains. To test whether the action of apoE depends on the presence of the LDLr, VLDL production was measured in LDLr−/− and apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice. Deletion of apoE on a LDLr−/− background still caused a 50% decrease of VLDL triglycerides and apoB production. The composition of nascent VLDL was again similar for both strains. We conclude that the effect of apoE on hepatic VLDL production is independent of the presence of the LDLr. Apolipoprotein (apo) E stimulates the secretion of very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs) by an as yet unknown mechanism. Recently, a working mechanism for apoE was proposed (Twisk, J., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Tebon, A., Wang, L., Barrett, P. H., and Attie, A. D. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 521–532) in which apoE prevents the inhibitory action of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) by binding to it. We have first tested whether this newly described effect of the LDLr on VLDL secretion, obtained in vitro, is also observed in vivo. In LDLr knockout mice (LDLr−/−), the production of VLDL triglycerides and apoB was 30% higher than that in controls. Also the ratio of apoB100:apoB48 secretion was increased in the LDLr−/− mice. The composition of nascent VLDL was similar in both strains. To test whether the action of apoE depends on the presence of the LDLr, VLDL production was measured in LDLr−/− and apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice. Deletion of apoE on a LDLr−/− background still caused a 50% decrease of VLDL triglycerides and apoB production. The composition of nascent VLDL was again similar for both strains. We conclude that the effect of apoE on hepatic VLDL production is independent of the presence of the LDLr. apolipoprotein low density lipoprotein low density lipoprotein receptor triglyceride very low density lipoprotein SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Apolipoprotein (apo)1 E is a 34.2-kDa protein that acts as a ligand for receptor-mediated endocytosis of lipoproteins (1Mahley R.W. Ji Z.S. J. Lipid Res. 1999; 40: 1-16Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The role of apoE in lipoprotein metabolism is not confined, however, to the clearance of lipoprotein particles from the circulation. ApoE inhibits lipolysis of lipoproteins by lipoprotein lipase (2Jong M.C. Dahlmans V.E. Hofker M.H. Havekes L.M. Biochem. J. 1997; 328: 745-750Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar, 3de Beer F. van Dijk K.W. Jong M.C. van Vark L.C. van Der Zee A. Hofker M.H. Fallaux F.J. Hoeben R.C. Smelt A.H. Havekes L.M. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000; 20: 1800-1806Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar). More recently, it was demonstrated that apoE also affects the hepatic secretion of very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs): apoE-deficient (apoE−/−) mice showed a reduction in VLDL secretion by some 50% (4Kuipers F. Jong M.C. Lin Y. Eck M. Havinga R. Bloks V. Verkade H.J. Hofker M.H. Moshage H. Berkel T.J. Vonk R.J. Havekes L.M. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 2915-2922Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar), whereas adenoviral gene transfer of human apoE3 led to a gene dose-dependent increase in VLDL production (5Mensenkamp A.R. Jong M.C. van Goor H. van Luyn M.J. Bloks V. Havinga R. Voshol P.J. Hofker M.H. van Dijk K.W. Havekes L.M. Kuipers F. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 35711-35718Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar). Similar results were obtained in transgenic rabbits expressing human apoE3 (6Huang Y. Ji Z.S. Brecht W.J. Rall S.C. Taylor J.M. Mahley R.W. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999; 19: 2952-2959Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar). Hepatic overexpression of apoE2, apoE3, and apoE4 all stimulated VLDL secretion (7Maugeais C. Tietge U.J. Tsukamoto K. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 1673-1679Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 8Tsukamoto K. Maugeais C. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 253-259Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 9Tsukamoto K. Smith P. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 107-114Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar). In contrast, the mutant isoform apoE3Leiden is not capable of stimulating VLDL secretion (10Mensenkamp, A. R., Teusink, B., Baller, J. F. W., Wolters, H., Havinga, R., Willems van Dijk, K., Havekes, L. M., and Kuipers, F. (2001) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 21, in press.Google Scholar). The mechanism by which apoE affects VLDL assembly and secretion is poorly understood. A recent in vitro study by Twisk et al. (11Twisk J. Gillian-Daniel D.L. Tebon A. Wang L. Barrett P.H. Attie A.D. J. Clin. Invest. 2000; 105: 521-532Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) offered a potential mechanism by which apoE might affect VLDL secretion. These authors studied the role of the LDL receptor (LDLr) in production of VLDL. Experiments in cultured hepatocytes of LDLr−/− and control mice showed that LDLr−/− hepatocytes had a strongly increased apoB secretion. This was explained in part by a decreased intracellular degradation of apoB protein. It was concluded that the LDLr binds nascent apoB intracellularly during the course of VLDL assembly, thereby promoting its intracellular degradation. Because apoE and apoB are both ligands for the LDLr, it was suggested that apoE's stimulatory action on VLDL secretion might occur by preventing apoB from binding to the LDLr. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the effect of apoE on VLDL secretion is LDLr-dependent. After verification that the reported in vitro effects of the LDLr can also be observed in the in vivo situation, we tested whether the effect of apoE is LDLr-dependent by knocking out apoE on a LDLr-deficient background. Our results confirm that the LDLr modulates the VLDL production rate in vivo, but they also clearly indicate that the effect of apoE on VLDL production is independent of the presence of the LDLr. all mice were housed under standard conditions with free access to water and regular lab chow. For the comparison between wild type and LDLr−/− mice, male mice with a C57BL/6 background were used. Male animals were also used for comparison of apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice with LDLr−/− mice. Because the apoE−/− LDLr−/− double knockout mice were on a mixed background of C57BL/6 and 129, LDLr−/− mice on the same mixed genetic background as the double knockout mice were used in these experiments as controls. All experiments were approved by the institutional animal care committee. The in vivo VLDL production was measured after intravenous administration of 500 mg/kg Triton WR1339 as described previously (4Kuipers F. Jong M.C. Lin Y. Eck M. Havinga R. Bloks V. Verkade H.J. Hofker M.H. Moshage H. Berkel T.J. Vonk R.J. Havekes L.M. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 2915-2922Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar, 12Jong M.C. Dahlmans V.E. van Gorp P.J. Breuer M.L. Mol M.J. van Der Zee A. Frants R.R. Hofker M.H. Havekes L.M. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1996; 16: 934-940Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). To measure de novo synthesis of VLDL apoB, 100 µCi of 35S-Tran label (ICN, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands) was injected i.v. 30 min before Triton WR1339 injection. Blood samples were withdrawn from the tail at regular intervals after Triton WR1339 injection. Att = 120 min, an additional large blood sample was withdrawn via the orbital plexus. In each sample, plasma triglycerides (TGs) were determined, and the rate of triglyceride accumulation in plasma was taken as the in vivo rate of VLDL TG production. From the large blood sample at t = 120 min after Triton WR1339 administration, 200 µl of plasma was brought to 1.063 g/ml with potassium bromide in a volume of 2 ml, transferred to SW41 centrifuge tubes, and layered with a 1.006 g/ml salt solution. After 16 h of centrifugation at 37,000 rpm and 4 °C, the VLDL fraction was carefully removed by pipetting off 1.2 ml. ApoB in 0.2 ml of this VLDL fraction was precipitated with isopropanol (13Egusa G. Brady D.W. Grundy S.M. Howard B.V. J. Lipid Res. 1983; 24: 1261-1267Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), dissolved in 20% (w/v) SDS, and counted for assessment of total VLDL apoB production. Pilots with blood samples taken at t = 1 min after Triton WR1339 administration showed that basal activity was less than 10% of the value at t = 120 min, and therefore the t = 120 min point was taken as the totalde novo VLDL apoB production. In the remaining VLDL, triglycerides, phospholipids, and cholesterol were measured with commercially available kits as described previously (4Kuipers F. Jong M.C. Lin Y. Eck M. Havinga R. Bloks V. Verkade H.J. Hofker M.H. Moshage H. Berkel T.J. Vonk R.J. Havekes L.M. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 2915-2922Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar). This composition of VLDL is a mixture of VLDL that circulated before administration of Triton WR1339 and nascent VLDL produced during the 2-h period after Triton WR1339 administration. To obtain the composition of nascent VLDL, the contribution of circulating VLDL was determined and corrected for, as described previously (14Tacken P.J. Teusink B. Jong M.C. Harats D. Havekes L.M. van Dijk K.W. Hofker M.H. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 2055-2062Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). For determination of apoB100 and apoB48 production, an aliquot of the blood samples at t = 1 and t = 120 min after Triton WR1339 administration (10 µl) was delipidated by 1.8 ml of −20 °C diethyl ether:methanol (1:1), and, after centrifugation in an Eppendorff centrifuge (13,000 rpm, 10 min), the pellet was dissolved in sample buffer for SDS-PAGE analysis on a 5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel. A volume corresponding to 5 µl of plasma was loaded onto the gel. The gel was fixed by Coomassie staining (BioSafe Coomassie; Bio-Rad) and dried overnight between two cellophane sheets using a GradiDry gel drying solution (Gradipore). After drying, one sheet was carefully removed, and the uncovered part of the gel was autoradiographed with phosphoimager technology. Nonparametric Mann-WhitneyU tests were used for all statistical analyses.p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. First we tested whether the LDLr affects the VLDL secretion rate in vivo. Hepatic VLDL triglyceride and apoB production rates were measured by intravenous injection of 35S-Tran label and Triton WR1339 in 4-h-fasted mice. As shown in Fig.1A, LDLr−/− mice showed a 30% increase in the triglyceride production rate as compared with wild type animals (162 ± 42 and 211 ± 12 µmol·kg−1·h−1 for wild type and LDLr−/− animals, respectively; p < 0.005). Total apoB production (Fig. 1B) was also significantly increased by ∼30% in LDLr−/− mice as compared with wild type mice (100 ± 19% and 132 ± 42% for wild type and LDLr−/− mice, respectively; p < 0.05). We also measured the de novo synthesis rate of B100 and B48 by SDS-PAGE analysis of plasma collected 1 and 120 min after Triton WR1339 injection (Fig.1C). No significant differences could be observed between the LDLr−/− and wild type mice for apoB100 and apoB48 production rates, although the former strain secreted relatively more apoB100. This was evident from a significantly higher apoB100:apoB48 ratio (2.02 ± 0.39 and 1.26 ± 0.42 for LDLr−/− and wild type mice, respectively; p < 0.02). We have also analyzed the lipid composition of the nascent VLDL particles after Triton WR1339 injection (Fig.2). We confirmed that Triton WR1339 itself did not affect the lipid composition of lipoprotein particles. 2B. Teusink and H. van der Boom, unpublished observations. The composition of nascent VLDL was very similar between the LDLr−/− and wild type mice; both groups had triglycerides comprising ∼75% of total lipid mass. Circulating VLDL from LDLr−/− mice was somewhat lower in triglyceride content than VLDL of the wild type mice (50% and 69%, respectively). To determine whether the effect of apoE is dependent on the LDLr, we have characterized VLDL production and composition in apoE−/− LDLr−/− double knockout mice and LDLr −/− mice. As seen in Fig. 3A, the VLDL TG production was approximately 2-fold lower in the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice as compared with the LDLr−/− mice (77 ± 16 and 132 ± 39 µmol·kg−1·h−1 for apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice and LDLr−/− mice, respectively; p < 0.005). A similar result was obtained for the total VLDL apoB production (Fig. 3B). The rate of total apoB production was significantly lower in the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice than in the LDLr−/− mice (53 ± 17% and 100 ± 39% for apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice and LDLr−/− mice, respectively; p = 0.01). In Fig. 3C, SDS-PAGE analysis of plasma collected 1 and 120 min after Triton WR1339 administration is shown for the apoE−/− LDLr−/− double knockout mice and the LDLr−/− mice. Most strikingly, apoB100 production in the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice was severely diminished to only 10% of that of the LDLr−/− mice. In Fig. 4, the average composition of nascent and circulating VLDL is shown. Because of the high lipid levels in apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice before Triton WR1339 injection, the nascent VLDL composition is calculated using the differences in lipids between total VLDL 2 h after Triton WR1339 administration and the circulating VLDL lipid content (i.e. the lipids present before Triton WR1339 administration). In both mouse models, nascent VLDL was rich in triglycerides. Large differences were found in circulating VLDL: VLDL of the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice contained only 7% TGs as compared with 50% TGs in the LDLr−/− mice. In this study, we have tested the hypothesis that the effect of apoE on VLDL secretion is mediated via intracellular interaction with the LDL receptor. If this hypothesis were true, we reasoned that the 50% reduction of VLDL secretion as observed in the apoE−/− mouse compared with the wild type mouse controls (4Kuipers F. Jong M.C. Lin Y. Eck M. Havinga R. Bloks V. Verkade H.J. Hofker M.H. Moshage H. Berkel T.J. Vonk R.J. Havekes L.M. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 2915-2922Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar, 5Mensenkamp A.R. Jong M.C. van Goor H. van Luyn M.J. Bloks V. Havinga R. Voshol P.J. Hofker M.H. van Dijk K.W. Havekes L.M. Kuipers F. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 35711-35718Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar) should not be observed on a LDLr−/− background. Fig. 3 shows that the effect of deleting apoE in reducing VLDL secretion was independent of the LDL receptor: a 50% reduction of both VLDL apoB and TGs was observed in the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mouse as compared with the LDLr−/− controls. The conclusion that apoE acts on the VLDL assembly pathway irrespective of the presence of the LDLr is indirectly supported by other recent studies. On one hand, it was shown that apoE2, a variant of apoE that binds poorly to lipoprotein receptors (15Mahley R.W. Science. 1988; 240: 622-630Crossref PubMed Scopus (3392) Google Scholar), is still capable of stimulating VLDL secretion (3de Beer F. van Dijk K.W. Jong M.C. van Vark L.C. van Der Zee A. Hofker M.H. Fallaux F.J. Hoeben R.C. Smelt A.H. Havekes L.M. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000; 20: 1800-1806Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 7Maugeais C. Tietge U.J. Tsukamoto K. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 1673-1679Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 9Tsukamoto K. Smith P. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 107-114Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar). On the other hand, truncation of apoE at the C-terminal lipid-binding domain abolishes the stimulatory effect of apoE on VLDL secretion (16Kypreos K.E. Teusink B. Willems V.D. Havekes L.M. Zannis V.I. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 1598-1600Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar, 17Kypreos K.E. Willems van Dijk K. Van der Zee A. Havekes L.M. Zannis V.I. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 19778-19786Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar). This truncated form of apoE is properly transcribed and detectable in plasma associated with VLDL particles, and it still contains an intact LDLr binding domain as judged by rescue from hyperlipidemia in apoE−/− mice. Thus, if competition of apoE with apoB for binding to the LDLr was the mechanism of apoE's action on VLDL secretion, the truncated apoE protein should still be able to increase VLDL secretion, whereas apoE2 should not be able to do so. Because the opposite is observed, we conclude that lipid binding, rather than receptor binding, is important for the stimulation of VLDL production by apoE. Although apoE does not act via the LDL receptor, we did confirmin vivo that absence of the LDLr enhances VLDL apoB secretion as described previously for mouse hepatocytes (11Twisk J. Gillian-Daniel D.L. Tebon A. Wang L. Barrett P.H. Attie A.D. J. Clin. Invest. 2000; 105: 521-532Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Thus, LDLr deficiency leads to a 30% increase in VLDL apoB production. Also, the rate of VLDL TG secretion was increased by 30% in LDLr−/− mice. The effects of the LDL receptor on VLDL apoB100 and apoB48 secretion were too small for our analysis to give significant differences. However, we found a significant increase in the ratio of secreted apoB100:apoB48 particles in the LDLr−/− mice. Thus, although the effect of the LDLr on VLDL apoB production in vivo is much smaller than that observed in vitro, it is in line with the previous in vitro observation that apoB100 secretion was increased 3–4-fold, and apoB48 was increased only 1.5–2-fold (11Twisk J. Gillian-Daniel D.L. Tebon A. Wang L. Barrett P.H. Attie A.D. J. Clin. Invest. 2000; 105: 521-532Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). It has been reported that the genetic background can have a large impact on the rate of VLDL secretion (18Voyiaziakis E. Ko C. O'Rourke S.M. Huang L. J. Lipid Res. 1999; 40: 2004-2012Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Because the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice were on a mixed background of C57BL/6 and 129, we used LDLr−/− mice that were on the same mixed background. Our data confirm the impact of genetic background: when the rate of VLDL TG secretion is compared between the LDLr−/− mice on the two genetic backgrounds used in this study, the mice on a C57/BL6 background clearly had a higher VLDL TG secretion as compared with mice on the mixed background (211 ± 12 and 132 ± 39 µmol·kg−1·h−1, respectively). The composition of nascent VLDL was similar for all mouse models tested, comprising ∼70–75% triglycerides (Figs. 2 and 4). The TG content of the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice was higher, i.e.88%, but this is likely the result of the large contribution of circulating VLDL to the total VLDL fraction after Triton WR1339 administration. In particular, the cholesterol content of nascent VLDL is prone to large error because of the enormous amount of cholesterol already present in these mice (19van Dijk K.W. van Vlijmen B.J. De Winther M.P. van't Hof B. van Der, Zee A. van Der Boom H. Havekes L.M. Hofker M.H. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999; 19: 2945-2951Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar, 20Ishibashi S. Herz J. Maeda N. Goldstein J.L. Brown M.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 4431-4435Crossref PubMed Scopus (365) Google Scholar). Similar TG content of nascent VLDL is consistent with the fact that both total apoB and VLDL TG secretion were affected to the same extent in both Figs. 1 and 3. Maugeais et al. (7Maugeais C. Tietge U.J. Tsukamoto K. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 1673-1679Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) previously reached a similar conclusion regarding the effect of apoE isoforms on VLDL production,i.e. that both apoB and TGs were affected. However, we have recently seen that the particles secreted by hepatocytes of apoE−/− mice were smaller, although they were of similar composition (4Kuipers F. Jong M.C. Lin Y. Eck M. Havinga R. Bloks V. Verkade H.J. Hofker M.H. Moshage H. Berkel T.J. Vonk R.J. Havekes L.M. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 2915-2922Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar). It appears that particle size and lipid composition are not always tightly correlated, but it remains to be seen whether this observation is specific for particles lacking apoE. In the mouse models tested in this study and also in other mouse models, e.g. the VLDLr−/− LDLr−/− mouse (14Tacken P.J. Teusink B. Jong M.C. Harats D. Havekes L.M. van Dijk K.W. Hofker M.H. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 2055-2062Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) and the apoE−/− mouse (4Kuipers F. Jong M.C. Lin Y. Eck M. Havinga R. Bloks V. Verkade H.J. Hofker M.H. Moshage H. Berkel T.J. Vonk R.J. Havekes L.M. J. Clin. Invest. 1997; 100: 2915-2922Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar), nascent VLDL invariably contained ∼65–80% triglycerides. This contrasts with studies in humans or in vitro systems. Compartmental modeling of apoB lipoprotein metabolism in humans invariably requires the input of particles into the plasma compartment ranging from large buoyant VLDL to LDL (21Packard C.J. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 1999; 10: 237-244Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 22Packard C.J. Demant T. Stewart J.P. Bedford D. Caslake M.J. Schwertfeger G. Bedynek A. Shepherd J. Seidel D. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 305-318Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 23Packard C.J. Shepherd J. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1997; 17: 3542-3556Crossref PubMed Scopus (333) Google Scholar). Also, in in vitro experiments, the size (i.e.triglyceride content) of the lipoprotein particles produced varies and appears to be related to lipid availability (for review, see Ref. 24Davis R.A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999; 1440: 1-31Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar), although it has been suggested that lipolytic activity in the medium may account for at least some of the observed effects (25Arrol S. Mackness M.I. Durrington P.N. Atherosclerosis. 2000; 150: 255-264Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar). We2 and others (26Aalto-Setala K. Fisher E.A. Chen X. Chajek-Shaul T. Hayek T. Zechner R. Walsh A. Ramakrishnan R. Ginsberg H.N. Breslow J.L. J. Clin. Invest. 1992; 90: 1889-1900Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) have verified that catabolism of VLDL is completely blocked by Triton WR1339 administration, thus the composition of the VLDL that subsequently accumulates should be a direct measure of the composition of nascent VLDL. Therefore, we conclude that in contrast to the human situation, mice secrete VLDL rather homogeneously as triglyceride-rich particles. It therefore appears that in mice, the rate of VLDL production is regulated not so much by VLDL composition as by particle number, i.e. by degradation of nascent apoB protein and/or pre-VLDL particles during the second stage of VLDL assembly (24Davis R.A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999; 1440: 1-31Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar, 27Olofsson S.O. Asp L. Boren J. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 1999; 10: 341-346Crossref PubMed Scopus (188) Google Scholar). The large differences in the TG content of circulating VLDL as opposed to nascent VLDL (Figs. 2and 4) reflect differences in VLDL catabolism (10Mensenkamp, A. R., Teusink, B., Baller, J. F. W., Wolters, H., Havinga, R., Willems van Dijk, K., Havekes, L. M., and Kuipers, F. (2001) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 21, in press.Google Scholar). We observed an unexpected effect of combined apoE and LDLr deficiency on the secretion of apoB100 particles: in the apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice, the secretion of apoB100 was reduced to only 10% of that in LDLr−/− mice. In apoE−/− mice, apoB100 production is at most 50% lower (5Mensenkamp A.R. Jong M.C. van Goor H. van Luyn M.J. Bloks V. Havinga R. Voshol P.J. Hofker M.H. van Dijk K.W. Havekes L.M. Kuipers F. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 35711-35718Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar,7Maugeais C. Tietge U.J. Tsukamoto K. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 1673-1679Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), indicating that the severely reduced apoB100 production is a specific effect of combined apoE and LDLr deficiency. At this moment, we can only speculate on the mechanism that underlies this striking observation. Rather, we would like to discuss some fundamental differences between B100- and B48-containing lipoproteins that may be relevant in rationalizing our observations. ApoB48 does not bind to the LDLr but rather requires the LDLr-related protein for endocytosis (28Rohlmann A. Gotthardt M. Hammer R.E. Herz J. J. Clin. Invest. 1998; 101: 689-695Crossref PubMed Scopus (403) Google Scholar, 29Veniant M.M. Zlot C.H. Walzem R.L. Pierotti V. Driscoll R. Dichek D. Herz J. Young S.G. J. Clin. Invest. 1998; 102: 1559-1568Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar). LDLr-related protein-mediated uptake of lipoproteins depends on apoE (30Linton M.F. Hasty A.H. Babaev V.R. Fazio S. J. Clin. Invest. 1998; 101: 1726-1736Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar). Therefore, in the apoE−/− mouse, the LDLr and the LDLr-related protein are not able to take up apoB48 particles. However, secretion of apoB48 particles by the liver still continues (5Mensenkamp A.R. Jong M.C. van Goor H. van Luyn M.J. Bloks V. Havinga R. Voshol P.J. Hofker M.H. van Dijk K.W. Havekes L.M. Kuipers F. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 35711-35718Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar, 7Maugeais C. Tietge U.J. Tsukamoto K. Glick J.M. Rader D.J. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41: 1673-1679Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Because the rate of apoB48 particle secretion should equal the rate of apoB48 particle uptake in steady state, this implies that other receptors should be present to clear these apoB48 particles. One receptor may be the recently cloned apoB48 receptor (31Brown M.L. Ramprasad M.P. Umeda P.K. Tanaka A. Kobayashi Y. Watanabe T. Shimoyamada H. Kuo W.L. Li R. Song R. Bradley W.A. Gianturco S.H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 7488-7493Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar). In the LDLr−/− apoE−/− mouse, apoB100 particles must also be cleared by receptors other than the LDLr and the LDLr-related protein. It appears that these back-up systems perform poorly because Ishibashiet al. (20Ishibashi S. Herz J. Maeda N. Goldstein J.L. Brown M.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 4431-4435Crossref PubMed Scopus (365) Google Scholar) found that plasma B100 levels were well detectable (∼50% of normal) in these mice, despite the very low production rate that we have observed in this study. The extremely low TG content of the circulating VLDL as compared with that in the wild type also suggests very poor clearance of VLDL particles. It may be envisaged that the reduced VLDL apoB100 secretion rate in apoE−/− LDLr−/− mice is the result of some unknown feedback mechanism to maintain steady state and prevent unrestrained accumulation of apoB100 particles in the circulation. Such a feedback on VLDL secretion is only hypothetical at this moment; yet it becomes apparent that factors such as apoE and the LDLr that are clearly involved in lipoprotein uptake are also involved in VLDL production. The concept of hepatic VLDL production as a merely substrate-driven process (32Lewis G.F. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 1997; 8: 146-153Crossref PubMed Scopus (246) Google Scholar) thus requires considerable sophistication. We thank Elly de Wit for help with SDS-PAGE analysis and Peter Voshol for help with statistical analysis." @default.
• W2124002790 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2124002790 creator A5025131217 @default.
• W2124002790 creator A5025759499 @default.
• W2124002790 creator A5032174537 @default.
• W2124002790 creator A5035535699 @default.
• W2124002790 creator A5058098724 @default.
• W2124002790 creator A5070958079 @default.
• W2124002790 date "2001-11-01" @default.
• W2124002790 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2124002790 title "Stimulation of the in Vivo Production of Very Low Density Lipoproteins by Apolipoprotein E Is Independent of the Presence of the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor" @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1856179322 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1887362885 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1930735427 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1967374526 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1971834210 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1982789996 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1984867098 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1987066539 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1994148776 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W1995797667 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2034968148 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2037748881 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2039543531 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2061317455 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2067089828 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2069158164 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2092266450 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2097151876 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2111651979 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2117532223 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2117950105 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2122433263 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2132802442 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2135136607 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2136127396 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2138452551 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2145851386 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2150436995 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2150855617 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2160942744 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2183983473 @default.
• W2124002790 cites W2118730933 @default.
• W2124002790 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m106396200" @default.
• W2124002790 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11546779" @default.
• W2124002790 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2124002790 type Work @default.
• W2124002790 sameAs 2124002790 @default.
• W2124002790 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2124002790 countsByYear W21240027902012 @default.
• W2124002790 countsByYear W21240027902018 @default.
• W2124002790 countsByYear W21240027902020 @default.
• W2124002790 countsByYear W21240027902021 @default.
• W2124002790 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2124002790 hasAuthorship W2124002790A5025131217 @default.
• W2124002790 hasAuthorship W2124002790A5025759499 @default.
• W2124002790 hasAuthorship W2124002790A5032174537 @default.
• W2124002790 hasAuthorship W2124002790A5035535699 @default.
• W2124002790 hasAuthorship W2124002790A5058098724 @default.
• W2124002790 hasAuthorship W2124002790A5070958079 @default.
• W2124002790 hasBestOaLocation W21240027901 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C174782155 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C207001950 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C2778163477 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C2779620165 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C2780072125 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C43554185 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C56623246 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C62746215 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C8243546 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C126322002 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C134018914 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C170493617 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C174782155 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C185592680 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C207001950 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C24998067 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C2778163477 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C2779620165 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C2780072125 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C43554185 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C54355233 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C55493867 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C56623246 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C62746215 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C71924100 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C8243546 @default.
• W2124002790 hasConceptScore W2124002790C86803240 @default.
• W2124002790 hasIssue "44" @default.

• next