FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124165852> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2124165852 endingPage "143" @default.
• W2124165852 startingPage "138" @default.
• W2124165852 abstract "The paper examines hand-written annotation, its many features, difficulties and strengths as a feedback tool. It extends and clarifies what modest evidence is in the public domain and offers an evaluation of how to use annotation effectively in the support of student feedback [Marshall, C.M., 1998a. The Future of Annotation in a Digital (paper) World. Presented at the 35th Annual GLSLIS Clinic: Successes and Failures of Digital Libraries, June 20–24, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, March 24, pp. 1–20; Marshall, C.M., 1998b. Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Hypertext. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, June 20–24, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, US, pp. 40–49; Wolfe, J.L., Nuewirth, C.M., 2001. From the margins to the centre: the future of annotation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(3), 333–371; Diyanni, R., 2002. One Hundred Great Essays. Addison-Wesley, New York; Wolfe, J.L., 2002. Marginal pedagogy: how annotated texts affect writing-from-source texts. Written Communication, 19(2), 297–333; Liu, K., 2006. Annotation as an index to critical writing. Urban Education, 41, 192–207; Feito, A., Donahue, P., 2008. Minding the gap annotation as preparation for discussion. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 295–307; Ball, E., 2009. A participatory action research study on handwritten annotation feedback and its impact on staff and students. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(2), 111–124; Ball, E., Franks, H., McGrath, M., Leigh, J., 2009. Annotation is a valuable tool to enhance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Education Today, 29(3), 284–291]. Although a significant number of studies examine annotation, this is largely related to on-line tools and computer mediated communication and not hand-written annotation as comment, phrase or sign written on the student essay to provide critique. Little systematic research has been conducted to consider how this latter form of annotation influences student learning and assessment or, indeed, helps tutors to employ better annotative practices [Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., Smith, B., 2004. Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy, 1–40; Jewitt, C., Kress, G., 2005. English in classrooms: only write down what you need to know: annotation for what? English in Education, 39(1), 5–18]. There is little evidence on ways to heighten students’ self-awareness when their essays are returned with annotated feedback [Storch, N., Tapper, J., 1997. Student annotations: what NNS and NS university students say about their own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(3), 245–265]. The literature review clarifies forms of annotation as feedback practice and offers a summary of the challenges and usefulness of annotation." @default.
• W2124165852 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2124165852 creator A5028036496 @default.
• W2124165852 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2124165852 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2124165852 title "Annotation an effective device for student feedback: A critical review of the literature" @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1971357016 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1974306999 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1979306936 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1982469351 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1983808127 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1987597583 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1993382381 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W1999172777 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2015343734 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2018436112 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2025006047 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2027202965 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2037270872 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2039754648 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2042678920 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2066485774 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2068553215 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2069406446 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2071455013 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2075675218 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2076156774 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2076201180 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2078315908 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2091721072 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2093895705 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2094799191 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2119001534 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2126091572 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2137125440 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2142995122 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2160992809 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W2165581088 @default.
• W2124165852 cites W4255251726 @default.
• W2124165852 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.05.003" @default.
• W2124165852 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19560401" @default.
• W2124165852 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2124165852 type Work @default.
• W2124165852 sameAs 2124165852 @default.
• W2124165852 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522012 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522013 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522014 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522015 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522016 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522017 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522020 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522021 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522022 @default.
• W2124165852 countsByYear W21241658522023 @default.
• W2124165852 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2124165852 hasAuthorship W2124165852A5028036496 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C162215914 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C2776244770 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C2776321320 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C2780126544 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C121332964 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C136764020 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C154945302 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C161191863 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C162215914 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C24890656 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C2776244770 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C2776321320 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C2780126544 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C41008148 @default.
• W2124165852 hasConceptScore W2124165852C49774154 @default.
• W2124165852 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2124165852 hasLocation W21241658521 @default.
• W2124165852 hasLocation W21241658522 @default.
• W2124165852 hasOpenAccess W2124165852 @default.
• W2124165852 hasPrimaryLocation W21241658521 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W1566994962 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W1935614152 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W1978815574 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W1996815358 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W2106831255 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W2160599595 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W2178182010 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W2262279397 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W4232170258 @default.
• W2124165852 hasRelatedWork W4248177010 @default.
• W2124165852 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2124165852 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2124165852 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2124165852 magId "2124165852" @default.

• next