Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124290041> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 97 of
97
with 100 items per page.
- W2124290041 endingPage "779" @default.
- W2124290041 startingPage "779" @default.
- W2124290041 abstract "The focus on actuarial tables and rating systems by state regulators is insufficient to ensure that protected groups are not discriminated against by insurance industry. The most powerful tool used to exclude unwanted groups from insurance pool lies in subjective underwriting guidelines companies utilize, yet rhetoric surrounding insurance industry shifts attention away from this area. In this article I focus on narratives that members of insurance industry construct to depict certain groups as uninsurable. If we study stories that inform creation of actuarial tables and underwriting guidelines, we arrive at a far different perspective on antidiscriminatory regulation than is currently practiced. I. Introduction As recent court cases and academic studies have revealed, discrimination against certain groups by insurance industry still remains an unfortunate practice (United States v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company [1995]; Insurer To Revise Its Urban Business, New York Times, 1 Feb. 1997; Treaster 1998). By definition, discrimination occurs when two otherwise identical individuals are treated differently by virtue of a particular characteristic. Paired testing using black and white applicants has revealed that illegal discrimination (i.e., using distinctions based on criteria banned by law) can take many forms, from agents refusing to return customer phone calls, to offering higher prices and weaker policies, to denying outright coverage for members of unwanted groups (Lynch 1997; Smith & Cloud 1997; but see Wissoker, Zimmermann & Galster 1998). Discrimination can also take more subtle form of insurance company being slower to handle claims of ethnic minority claimants than of whites (Baker & McElrath 1997; Chan 1999). Insurance companies desire certain groups more than others as customers, and as a result, those who do not fit underwriter's vision of ideal member of society, such as certain racial and ethnic minorities, poor, gays and lesbians, and people with alternative lifestyles, can have a difficult time obtaining desired coverage. The biggest concern about discriminatory practices for those trying to eradicate them is how difficult they are to detect. Depending on state, insurance commissions can be grossly under-funded, and in any event they tend to focus almost exclusively on financial aspects of industry, such as whether companies have sufficient loss reserves and whether their rates are adequate (Abraham 1995: 99). For most discriminatory practices to be exposed then, affected group must either register a complaint with state's insurance commission or file a suit in court. These individuals must somehow first become aware that they are being discriminated against, and this can be difficult to do if they do not understand underwriting process or if they are unaware that insurance company categorizes them in a certain manner (Austin 1983; Simon 1988). In fact, they may not even realize that they have been discriminated against at all, since their agents will most likely manage to cover up effects by placing them in other, less advantageous, programs. Underwriting is process of determining which applications company should accept, and for those who are accepted, in which program they belong. The process of risk selection (as underwriting is also known) has two faces, one that is presented to regulators and applicants, and a second that is used by underwriters. I argue that Janus-like aspect of underwriting is what has allowed a great deal of discrimination to continue for as long as it has. The outward face is one of numbers, statistics, and objectivity. The inward face is that of narratives, character, and subjective judgement. The rhetoric of insurance exclusion-numbers, objectivity, and statistics-form what I call the myth of actuary, a powerful rhetorical situation in which decisions appear to be based on objectively determined criteria when they are also largely based on subjective ones. …" @default.
- W2124290041 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2124290041 creator A5040452607 @default.
- W2124290041 date "2000-01-01" @default.
- W2124290041 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2124290041 title "The Shifting Rhetoric of Insurance Denial" @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1480551106 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1500705884 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1512846187 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1553357012 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1570366101 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1965421168 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1975535635 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1976953677 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1982828114 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1989952747 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1993175933 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W1995254798 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2028394852 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2052588840 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2060098973 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2079216754 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2101052154 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W21026802 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2108201985 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2122915031 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2314854685 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2325693514 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2327137921 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2613378452 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2730120296 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W275850004 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2799187443 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W2800169110 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W3044193424 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W3215979124 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W401101152 @default.
- W2124290041 cites W584125153 @default.
- W2124290041 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3115143" @default.
- W2124290041 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W2124290041 type Work @default.
- W2124290041 sameAs 2124290041 @default.
- W2124290041 citedByCount "28" @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412013 @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412015 @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412019 @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412020 @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412021 @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412022 @default.
- W2124290041 countsByYear W21242900412023 @default.
- W2124290041 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2124290041 hasAuthorship W2124290041A5040452607 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C1370556 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C2780900520 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C11171543 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C1370556 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C138885662 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C144024400 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C144133560 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C15744967 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C162118730 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C17744445 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C190253527 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C199539241 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C2780900520 @default.
- W2124290041 hasConceptScore W2124290041C41895202 @default.
- W2124290041 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2124290041 hasLocation W21242900411 @default.
- W2124290041 hasOpenAccess W2124290041 @default.
- W2124290041 hasPrimaryLocation W21242900411 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W2013236657 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W2124290041 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W2127006787 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W4240773907 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W4327756709 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W4385533415 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W600593816 @default.
- W2124290041 hasRelatedWork W2125068414 @default.
- W2124290041 hasVolume "34" @default.
- W2124290041 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2124290041 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2124290041 magId "2124290041" @default.
- W2124290041 workType "article" @default.