FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124424805> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2124424805 abstract "The shortage of registered nurses is an issue globally, but particularly in rural and remote areas. Previous research in medicine suggests that recruiting students from rural backgrounds is an effective strategy to enhance the supply of rural healthcare providers. This strategy has not been widely adopted or evaluated in nursing. The purpose of this study was to compare rural and urban nursing students in relation to application, admission, and retention/graduation trends at a metropolitan state university in the Pacific Northwest area of the USA.A retrospective longitudinal descriptive design was used, analyzing existing data from 2005 to 2010. The sample included 1283 applicants, accepted students, and graduates. Rural-urban classification was made using rural urban commuting area (RUCA) codes based on high school zip codes, identifying 356 (28%) rural and 927 (72%) urban individuals. The data were analyzed quantitatively, assessing demographic characteristics along with application, admission and retention/graduation rates.The analysis indicated no significant differences between the rural and urban samples in relation to age, gender, parents' level of education, income, or retention rates. The acceptance rate for rural students (66.3%) was significantly lower than for urban students (73.1%) (p=0.015). When rural subgroups (isolated, small rural and large rural) were examined, the isolated group (n=61) had the highest acceptance rate of any rural or urban group (75%). This group was the least ethnically diverse (95% Caucasian), was the least likely to be first-generation college (22%), had the highest percentage of females (85%) and had the highest entering grade point average (3.65 on a four-point scale). In contrast, the subgroup including individuals from large rural communities (n=182) had the lowest acceptance rate (64%), the lowest retention rate 85%, the lowest entering grade point average (3.42), and the highest percentage of first-generation college individuals (50.9%).The findings suggest that students from rural backgrounds achieve similar levels of success in nursing education, despite lower acceptance rates, when compared with urban students. Addressing issues related to lower acceptance rates for rural nursing students, including targeted recruitment and support efforts with students interested in pursuing nursing at the junior and senior high school levels, may be indicated. Further research is indicated to explore differences among rural subgroups in relation to preparation for and achievement in nursing education. Greater research attention is also needed to assess if nursing students from rural backgrounds tend to practice in rural areas more than students from urban backgrounds, similar to previous research in medicine. Because students tend to practice near their place of education, nursing education programs may need to consider locating outside of large urban areas to promote rural practice. Inclusion of rural content and clinical experiences within nursing curricula is also recommended." @default.
• W2124424805 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2124424805 creator A5041088117 @default.
• W2124424805 creator A5048610899 @default.
• W2124424805 date "2013-10-25" @default.
• W2124424805 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2124424805 title "Recruitment and retention of rural nursing students: a retrospective study" @default.
• W2124424805 cites W141326088 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W1964934210 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W1966163795 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W1971642342 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W1975733128 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W1998978174 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2000412265 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2015580492 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2027954668 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2028809821 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2038185387 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2039049732 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2045989648 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W205847437 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2062136760 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2067232922 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2085881229 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2099834453 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2100364290 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2102263473 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2107502354 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2131182497 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2134813834 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2150019621 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2164343735 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2313479461 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2337494976 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2414843794 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2750619099 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2907542455 @default.
• W2124424805 cites W2991871779 @default.
• W2124424805 doi "https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh2486" @default.
• W2124424805 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24160687" @default.
• W2124424805 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2124424805 type Work @default.
• W2124424805 sameAs 2124424805 @default.
• W2124424805 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2124424805 countsByYear W21244248052015 @default.
• W2124424805 countsByYear W21244248052016 @default.
• W2124424805 countsByYear W21244248052017 @default.
• W2124424805 countsByYear W21244248052022 @default.
• W2124424805 countsByYear W21244248052023 @default.
• W2124424805 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2124424805 hasAuthorship W2124424805A5041088117 @default.
• W2124424805 hasAuthorship W2124424805A5048610899 @default.
• W2124424805 hasBestOaLocation W21244248051 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C129047720 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C158739034 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C194051981 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C2779529714 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C129047720 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C138885662 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C142724271 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C144024400 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C149923435 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C15744967 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C158739034 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C159110408 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C194051981 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C205649164 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C2524010 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C2778137410 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C2779529714 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C33923547 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C41895202 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C45355965 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C512399662 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C71924100 @default.
• W2124424805 hasConceptScore W2124424805C74909509 @default.
• W2124424805 hasLocation W21244248051 @default.
• W2124424805 hasLocation W21244248052 @default.
• W2124424805 hasLocation W21244248053 @default.
• W2124424805 hasOpenAccess W2124424805 @default.
• W2124424805 hasPrimaryLocation W21244248051 @default.
• W2124424805 hasRelatedWork W1966101433 @default.
• W2124424805 hasRelatedWork W1970327333 @default.
• W2124424805 hasRelatedWork W2068111545 @default.
• W2124424805 hasRelatedWork W2188489473 @default.

• next