FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124709780> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2124709780 endingPage "1467" @default.
• W2124709780 startingPage "1458" @default.
• W2124709780 abstract "ObjectiveTo compare the use of a balloon catheter device with the use of a cervical vacuum cup device in performing hysterosalpingography (HSG).DesignProspective, randomized, single-blinded study.SettingTertiary infertility center.Patient(s)Two hundred twenty-nine infertile women undergoing HSG.Intervention(s)Subjects were randomized to undergo HSG using a cervical vacuum cup (n = 115) or a balloon catheter (n = 114). Randomization was performed according to Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.Main Outcome Measure(s)The degree of pain experienced during and after the HSG, evaluated using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. The length of the procedure, the fluoroscopic time, the volume of contrast used, the difficulty of performing HSG, and the percentage of complications were also evaluated.Result(s)Women in the cervical-cup group experienced more pain than those in the balloon catheter group during the contrast injection (median visual analogue scale pain scores, 13.0 vs. 6.5). The placement of the balloon catheter in comparison with the cervical cup was slightly easier to perform, although it required a somewhat longer time. The HSG using the cervical cup required less fluoroscopic time (median, 0.6 vs. 0.8 min).Conclusion(s)The balloon catheter appears to be better tolerated than the cervical cup, but the difference is minimal. The use of the cervical cup allows shortening of the patient radiation exposure. To compare the use of a balloon catheter device with the use of a cervical vacuum cup device in performing hysterosalpingography (HSG). Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Tertiary infertility center. Two hundred twenty-nine infertile women undergoing HSG. Subjects were randomized to undergo HSG using a cervical vacuum cup (n = 115) or a balloon catheter (n = 114). Randomization was performed according to Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The degree of pain experienced during and after the HSG, evaluated using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. The length of the procedure, the fluoroscopic time, the volume of contrast used, the difficulty of performing HSG, and the percentage of complications were also evaluated. Women in the cervical-cup group experienced more pain than those in the balloon catheter group during the contrast injection (median visual analogue scale pain scores, 13.0 vs. 6.5). The placement of the balloon catheter in comparison with the cervical cup was slightly easier to perform, although it required a somewhat longer time. The HSG using the cervical cup required less fluoroscopic time (median, 0.6 vs. 0.8 min). The balloon catheter appears to be better tolerated than the cervical cup, but the difference is minimal. The use of the cervical cup allows shortening of the patient radiation exposure." @default.
• W2124709780 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2124709780 creator A5055301930 @default.
• W2124709780 creator A5056963397 @default.
• W2124709780 creator A5057345856 @default.
• W2124709780 creator A5082977195 @default.
• W2124709780 creator A5026076901 @default.
• W2124709780 creator A5074980318 @default.
• W2124709780 date "2007-06-01" @default.
• W2124709780 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2124709780 title "Balloon catheter vs. cervical vacuum cup for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study" @default.
• W2124709780 cites W1963670700 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W1977477267 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W1999728659 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2029682324 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2035076648 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2048732209 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2053404893 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2054847388 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2058872441 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2072856001 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2077167367 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2082747723 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2084224020 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2096439222 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2142960568 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2150693261 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2414013206 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2417866724 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W2603578809 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W4230150389 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W4237942375 @default.
• W2124709780 cites W88184247 @default.
• W2124709780 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.096" @default.
• W2124709780 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19062006" @default.
• W2124709780 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2124709780 type Work @default.
• W2124709780 sameAs 2124709780 @default.
• W2124709780 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2124709780 countsByYear W21247097802012 @default.
• W2124709780 countsByYear W21247097802013 @default.
• W2124709780 countsByYear W21247097802014 @default.
• W2124709780 countsByYear W21247097802015 @default.
• W2124709780 countsByYear W21247097802016 @default.
• W2124709780 countsByYear W21247097802019 @default.
• W2124709780 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2124709780 hasAuthorship W2124709780A5026076901 @default.
• W2124709780 hasAuthorship W2124709780A5055301930 @default.
• W2124709780 hasAuthorship W2124709780A5056963397 @default.
• W2124709780 hasAuthorship W2124709780A5057345856 @default.
• W2124709780 hasAuthorship W2124709780A5074980318 @default.
• W2124709780 hasAuthorship W2124709780A5082977195 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C139059822 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C2779492760 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C2993470428 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C139059822 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C141071460 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C14184104 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C168563851 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C188816634 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C204243189 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C2777688143 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C2779234561 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C2779492760 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C2781267111 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C2993470428 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C54355233 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C71924100 @default.
• W2124709780 hasConceptScore W2124709780C86803240 @default.
• W2124709780 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2124709780 hasLocation W21247097801 @default.
• W2124709780 hasLocation W21247097802 @default.
• W2124709780 hasOpenAccess W2124709780 @default.
• W2124709780 hasPrimaryLocation W21247097801 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W1968149541 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2071884141 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2073564769 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2139970430 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2151659174 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2353199747 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2373077562 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W2384477163 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W3201374767 @default.
• W2124709780 hasRelatedWork W936546771 @default.
• W2124709780 hasVolume "87" @default.
• W2124709780 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2124709780 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next