FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124815146> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2124815146 endingPage "154" @default.
• W2124815146 startingPage "145" @default.
• W2124815146 abstract "Self determination has long been a concept of great interest to psychologists. For instance, self determination was a critical concept in the person-centered therapy and theory of personality that was forwarded by Carl Rogers (Patterson & Joseph, 2007). More recently, self-determination theory has emerged (e.g., Deci & Ryan, 2008) as a general theory of human behavior and motivation that has been applied in a wide variety of situations (e.g., education, Kaufman & Dodge, 2009; worker satisfaction & productivity, Kuvaas, 2009). The common theme related to self determination is that it is a good thing; people are happier, more motivated, and more productive when they can exercise self determination than when they cannot. Although behavioral psychologists have historically eschewed internal or personality variables as explanations for behavior, they too have explored the idea that situations that involve self determination are functionally different than situations that do not involve self determination. For instance, Graff, Libby, and Green (1998) found that participant-selected reinforcers maintained higher rates of free-operant responding, and produced less challenging behaviors, than did experimenter-selected reinforcers in two male participants with severe developmental disabilities. Geckeler, Libby, Graff, and Ahearn (2000) failed to replicate this effect on free-operant responding in three boys with Autism, but did find that when participant-and experimenter-selected reinforcers were available in a concurrent-choice procedure, all three boys showed a response preference for the alternative that allowed them to choose their own reinforcer. These results replicated those of a previous study (i.e., effect of self-determined choice only in the concurrent-schedule situation; Graff & Libby, 1999), which had studied four boys with either developmental disabilities or attention-deficit disorder. More recently, Tiger, Hanley, and Hernandez (2006) studied the effect of reinforcer choice on the behavior of preschool children. Results indicated that five of the six children showed an initial preference for choosing their own reinforcer, although this preference did not persist throughout the entire condition for several of the children. Tiger et al.'s fourth study demonstrated that the children continued to choose the reinforcer-choice option despite the fact that the response requirement for doing so was higher than the no-choice reinforcer option. Overall, these studies support the idea that an outcome that allows the individual to determine his/her own reinforcing consequences can be a more effective or preferred reinforcer than the identical outcome that is not chosen by the individual. Determining whether outcome choice is indeed a more powerful reinforcing consequence than a predetermined outcome has a number of potential implications, especially if that outcome can be demonstrated in an adult sample. For instance, the implication for individuals in the field of marketing would be that offering potential customers a self-chosen prize for visiting a business or website might be a more effective promotion than simply offering a predetermined prize. Instructors might find that students' work improves if their efforts result in a self-chosen outcome rather than an instructor-chosen outcome. Researchers who employ human participants in laboratory studies with the incentive of winning a prize (e.g., a gift card) for good performance may find improved performance if participants are offered a self-determined reward rather than an experimenter-chose one. The study of delay discount affords one measure of the value of an outcome or commodity. Delay discounting occurs when the value of an outcome is devalued because it is delayed in time. For instance, if someone owed you $100 but was not going to be able to pay you for a month, you might accept $95 immediately rather than waiting a month for the full amount. …" @default.
• W2124815146 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2124815146 creator A5025907511 @default.
• W2124815146 creator A5033804452 @default.
• W2124815146 creator A5059662906 @default.
• W2124815146 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2124815146 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2124815146 title "Delay discounting of self-determined and experimenter-determined commodities." @default.
• W2124815146 cites W175784155 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W1847236181 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W1972950717 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W1978233202 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W1983873923 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2004717177 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2011866399 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2019964383 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2032105672 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2040494662 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2049642423 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2058822659 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2062363053 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2082218440 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2107031757 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2113788396 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2122422450 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2123864759 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2139985073 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W50528818 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W57650185 @default.
• W2124815146 cites W2497965411 @default.
• W2124815146 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100697" @default.
• W2124815146 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2124815146 type Work @default.
• W2124815146 sameAs 2124815146 @default.
• W2124815146 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2124815146 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2124815146 hasAuthorship W2124815146A5025907511 @default.
• W2124815146 hasAuthorship W2124815146A5033804452 @default.
• W2124815146 hasAuthorship W2124815146A5059662906 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C2780319597 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C2994109249 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C3019428158 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C32362775 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C6177178 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C10138342 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C138496976 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C15744967 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C162324750 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C180747234 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C2780319597 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C2994109249 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C3019428158 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C32362775 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C6177178 @default.
• W2124815146 hasConceptScore W2124815146C77805123 @default.
• W2124815146 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2124815146 hasLocation W21248151461 @default.
• W2124815146 hasOpenAccess W2124815146 @default.
• W2124815146 hasPrimaryLocation W21248151461 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2050201821 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2056698958 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2123210662 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2298367631 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2411335237 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2435330988 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W2599339175 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W295975730 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W3207220179 @default.
• W2124815146 hasRelatedWork W4255719787 @default.
• W2124815146 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2124815146 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2124815146 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2124815146 magId "2124815146" @default.
• W2124815146 workType "article" @default.