Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2124964080> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2124964080 endingPage "513" @default.
- W2124964080 startingPage "507" @default.
- W2124964080 abstract "Background Prior case series have shown promising diagnostic sensitivity for CT scan-guided bronchoscopy. Methods This was a prospective randomized trial comparing CT scan-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. All procedures were performed using a protocolized number of passes for forceps, transbronchial needles, and brushes. Cytologists and pathologists were blinded as to bronchoscopy type. Patients with negative results underwent open surgical biopsy (for nodules or lymph nodes) or were observed for ≥ 2 years if they had a nodule < 1 cm in size. Results Fifty patients were enrolled into the study (CT scan-guided bronchoscopy, 26 patients; conventional bronchoscopy, 24 patients). Two patients, one from each arm, dropped out of the study. Ultimately, 36 patients were proven to have cancer, and 27 of these patients (75%) had their diagnosis made by bronchoscopy. The sensitivity for malignancy of CT scan-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for peripheral lesions was similar (71% vs 76%, respectively; p = 1.0). The sensitivity for malignancy of CT guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for mediastinal lymph nodes was higher (100% vs 67%, respectively) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.26). On a per-lymph-node basis, there was a trend toward higher diagnostic accuracy with CT scan guidance (p = 0.09). The diagnostic yield was higher in larger lesions (p = 0.004) and when CT scanning confirmed target entry (p = 0.001). Conclusion We failed to demonstrate a significant difference between CT scan-guided bronchoscopy and conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. Further study of improved steering methods combined with CT scan guidance for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions is warranted. Prior case series have shown promising diagnostic sensitivity for CT scan-guided bronchoscopy. This was a prospective randomized trial comparing CT scan-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. All procedures were performed using a protocolized number of passes for forceps, transbronchial needles, and brushes. Cytologists and pathologists were blinded as to bronchoscopy type. Patients with negative results underwent open surgical biopsy (for nodules or lymph nodes) or were observed for ≥ 2 years if they had a nodule < 1 cm in size. Fifty patients were enrolled into the study (CT scan-guided bronchoscopy, 26 patients; conventional bronchoscopy, 24 patients). Two patients, one from each arm, dropped out of the study. Ultimately, 36 patients were proven to have cancer, and 27 of these patients (75%) had their diagnosis made by bronchoscopy. The sensitivity for malignancy of CT scan-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for peripheral lesions was similar (71% vs 76%, respectively; p = 1.0). The sensitivity for malignancy of CT guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for mediastinal lymph nodes was higher (100% vs 67%, respectively) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.26). On a per-lymph-node basis, there was a trend toward higher diagnostic accuracy with CT scan guidance (p = 0.09). The diagnostic yield was higher in larger lesions (p = 0.004) and when CT scanning confirmed target entry (p = 0.001). We failed to demonstrate a significant difference between CT scan-guided bronchoscopy and conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. Further study of improved steering methods combined with CT scan guidance for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions is warranted." @default.
- W2124964080 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5010055934 @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5016649263 @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5020009191 @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5026898764 @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5058951588 @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5068559075 @default.
- W2124964080 creator A5071078590 @default.
- W2124964080 date "2008-09-01" @default.
- W2124964080 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2124964080 title "A Randomized Trial of CT Fluoroscopic-Guided Bronchoscopy vs Conventional Bronchoscopy in Patients With Suspected Lung Cancer" @default.
- W2124964080 cites W1931204769 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W1972553128 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W1976777537 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W1984603265 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W1991458728 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2054571729 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2055227581 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2065367073 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2072608168 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2083267889 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2090616778 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2091176953 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2092292583 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2108734092 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2110561531 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2114539173 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2117991242 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2119777616 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2123280902 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2127603776 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2132672953 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2134240392 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2138625291 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2139254136 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2157469526 @default.
- W2124964080 cites W2164535073 @default.
- W2124964080 doi "https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0160" @default.
- W2124964080 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18641093" @default.
- W2124964080 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2124964080 type Work @default.
- W2124964080 sameAs 2124964080 @default.
- W2124964080 citedByCount "48" @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802012 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802013 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802014 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802015 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802016 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802017 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802018 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802019 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802020 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802021 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802022 @default.
- W2124964080 countsByYear W21249640802023 @default.
- W2124964080 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5010055934 @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5016649263 @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5020009191 @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5026898764 @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5058951588 @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5068559075 @default.
- W2124964080 hasAuthorship W2124964080A5071078590 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2778996910 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2779013556 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2779399171 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C2780379385 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C121608353 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C126322002 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C126838900 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C142724271 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2775934546 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2776256026 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2778451229 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2778996910 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2779013556 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2779399171 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C2780379385 @default.
- W2124964080 hasConceptScore W2124964080C71924100 @default.
- W2124964080 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2124964080 hasLocation W21249640801 @default.
- W2124964080 hasLocation W21249640802 @default.
- W2124964080 hasOpenAccess W2124964080 @default.
- W2124964080 hasPrimaryLocation W21249640801 @default.
- W2124964080 hasRelatedWork W2022132038 @default.
- W2124964080 hasRelatedWork W2080881890 @default.
- W2124964080 hasRelatedWork W2228156639 @default.
- W2124964080 hasRelatedWork W2427775871 @default.
- W2124964080 hasRelatedWork W2441348925 @default.