FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2125786848> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2125786848 abstract "There are few studies in the literature comparing laparoscopic versus open Gastrectomy, predominantly for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Most of the available studies and meta-analysis compare both approaches in the early gastric cancer. The meta-analysis, here presented, compares the clinical outcomes between these two procedures for AGC.To evaluate the current status of both partial and total laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), with regard to its short and long-term outcomes by comparing it to conventional open gastrectomy (OG) for AGC.original articles published in English language from January 1991 to October 2009 were searched in the Medline, Embase, Current Contents, Science Citation Index databases and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. All articles comparing LG and OG for AGC were included, and those comparing outcomes only for early gastric cancer (EGC) were excluded. Clinical appraisal and data extraction were conducted independently by 3 reviewers. Statistical analysis was carried out following the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model.out of 2,344 studies, 7 studies were selected. One prospective randomized controlled trial, one comparative prospective study and five comparative retrospective studies were analyzed. These studies include a total of 452 patients with gastric cancer, 174 patients in the LG and 278 in the OG. The analyzed result variables were operative time, operative blood loss, hospital postoperative stay, number of dissected lymph nodes and cancer-related mortality risk. Compared to OG, LG was a longer procedure: weighted mean difference (WMD) 44 minutes; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20 to 69; I-squared = 91.6%, but was associated with a lower blood loss (WMD -122 cc; 95% CI -208 to -37; I-squared = 90.8%); this was more significant for hospital operative stay (WMD -6.2 days; 95% CI -9.4 to -2.8; I-squared = 67.8%). Moreover there were no significant differences between the two groups concerning the number of dissected lymph nodes (WMD -1.57; 95% CI -3.41 to 0.26; I-squared = 8.3) and no significant differences for cancer-related mortality risk (adjusted for 60 months of follow-up) although there was a tendency toward a protective effect for LG (Odds Ratio 0.53; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.22; I-squared 41%).Laparoscopic total and partial gastrectomy for AGC is associated with a longer operative time but lower blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Moreover there were similar outcomes between both approaches in terms of number of dissected lymph nodes and long-term follow-up (survival)." @default.
• W2125786848 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5002924046 @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5007361135 @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5021529922 @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5031981865 @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5039154665 @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5057145168 @default.
• W2125786848 creator A5071085854 @default.
• W2125786848 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2125786848 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2125786848 title "Laparoscopy versus open surgery for advanced and resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis" @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1537972189 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1835627226 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W186268426 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1964258472 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1968124013 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1968791559 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1968934186 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1982709109 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W1987670332 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2002014382 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2006769609 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2042948875 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2046374518 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2050841235 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2053107048 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2057655049 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2059045071 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2059079814 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2069978798 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2081040380 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2088095316 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2099433579 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2101254011 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2107026700 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2107679618 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2118983663 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2124482119 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2138370803 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2139833751 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2171171236 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2405132130 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2405482376 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2408552104 @default.
• W2125786848 cites W2768410408 @default.
• W2125786848 doi "https://doi.org/10.4321/s1130-01082011000300005" @default.
• W2125786848 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21434716" @default.
• W2125786848 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2125786848 type Work @default.
• W2125786848 sameAs 2125786848 @default.
• W2125786848 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482012 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482013 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482014 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482015 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482016 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482017 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482018 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482019 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482020 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482021 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482022 @default.
• W2125786848 countsByYear W21257868482023 @default.
• W2125786848 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5002924046 @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5007361135 @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5021529922 @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5031981865 @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5039154665 @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5057145168 @default.
• W2125786848 hasAuthorship W2125786848A5071085854 @default.
• W2125786848 hasBestOaLocation W21257868481 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C2780470880 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C121608353 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C126322002 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C141071460 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C168563851 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C17744445 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C199539241 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C2776111594 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C2779473830 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C2780047204 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C2780470880 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C44249647 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C71924100 @default.
• W2125786848 hasConceptScore W2125786848C82789193 @default.

• next