Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W212590922> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 56 of
56
with 100 items per page.
- W212590922 startingPage "613" @default.
- W212590922 abstract "In writing the majority opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court's scientific evidence ruling in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Justice Blackmun explained that subjective impressions are biased by the observer's model of the world, and thus can be misleading. As such, they do not represent definitive scientific evidence or knowledge. Pain as a scientific criterion Take these cases: * A dental patient complains pre-auricular Examination reveals that the pain is from ipsilateral trigger points in sternocleidomastoid or trapezius muscles. Lidocaine injection over the temporomandibular joint results in no pain relief, but injecting the remote trigger point does relieve the This is referred pain. * A patient complains of orofacial pain in the upper right arch, but examination reveals that it is an abscessed tooth in the lower right arch. This is localized pain. * A patient is asked if palpation of a certain area hurts. The patient answers, Not really. This non-definitive phrase doesn't say yes or no. We must recognize that pain is vague and quantification often is unreliable. * If a doctor palpitates the right side of a patient's face, and the patient indicates tenderness on the left, this is an example of pain. The pain exists only in the patient's mind with no known neurological circuitry, but the patient perceives it as real. * There is no pain, but the patient is lying about pain for financial gain. So, one must logically ask: Based on phenomena of pain, poorly localized pain, vagueness of pain, unreliability of quantification, variation in perception, presence of pain, vagueness of pain, unreliability of quantification, variation in perception, presence of psychosomatic pain and people who lie about pain, how accurate can a patient's self-reports of pain be used as evidence or scientific criterion for the study of temporomandibular disorder? The ultimate test for separating science from non-science is the ability of science to pose testable hypotheses. Scientific hypotheses must be possible to refute. A patient's complaint of pain has no observable, testable phenomenology. A patient's subjective complaint of pain is a belief statement and as such is irrefutable, unfalsifiable and therefore unscientific as diagnostic or scientific criteria. Self-reports of a patient's pain are inherently unrestable, obviously unreliable and therefore decidedly unscientific. The ultimate test of scientific knowledge is whether it can be tested. Scientific methodology is based on generating hypotheses and testing them to see if they can be falsified. The criterion of refutability, testability or falsibility is what distinguishes science from pseudoscience. Evidence v. inference Evidence has been defined variously as the means by which a fact is established; a body of facts on which proof is based; and facts that tend to clarify, support or prove a point in question. On the other hand, inference is a probable conclusion, not based on deduction, but loose usage, experience or statistical correlation. Inference does not absolutely establish a premise but constitutes a demonstration of probability. Circumstantial evidence consists of events and occurrences that establish reasonable grounds by which a fact is substantiated. Circumstantial evidence is an example of inference. It is considered soft rather than hard evidence. Epidemiology also exemplifies inference. It is concerned with the incidence of a disease in populations and addresses whether an agent can cause a disease, not whether it did cause any one patient's disease. Specific causation is beyond the domain of epidemiology, which is a soft science based on manipulation of statistics. Often there is confusion between correlation and causality when judgment is based on subjective experience. …" @default.
- W212590922 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W212590922 creator A5005980213 @default.
- W212590922 date "1997-10-01" @default.
- W212590922 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W212590922 title "Daubert, Pain, Evidence and Inference in Treating TMD" @default.
- W212590922 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
- W212590922 type Work @default.
- W212590922 sameAs 212590922 @default.
- W212590922 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W212590922 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W212590922 hasAuthorship W212590922A5005980213 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C124056412 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C2781167935 @default.
- W212590922 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C111472728 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C124056412 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C138885662 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C141071460 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C1862650 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C2781167935 @default.
- W212590922 hasConceptScore W212590922C71924100 @default.
- W212590922 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W212590922 hasLocation W2125909221 @default.
- W212590922 hasOpenAccess W212590922 @default.
- W212590922 hasPrimaryLocation W2125909221 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W1550471407 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W171313529 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W1969511891 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2010864654 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2014677748 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2030119003 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2038043687 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2048020105 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2048248167 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2049998656 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2097986111 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2120545781 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2133899161 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2404482873 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2414907211 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2419261370 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2441294891 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2522419842 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W2556235539 @default.
- W212590922 hasRelatedWork W66865351 @default.
- W212590922 hasVolume "64" @default.
- W212590922 isParatext "false" @default.
- W212590922 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W212590922 magId "212590922" @default.
- W212590922 workType "article" @default.