FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2126195809> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2126195809 endingPage "661" @default.
• W2126195809 startingPage "643" @default.
• W2126195809 abstract "The family movement in the United States has come of age: since the publication of Denny Taylor's seminal book in 1983 (Taylor, 1983), countless scholarly articles, research studies, and media reports on family have appeared. In the past 12 months alone, three major edited volumes have been devoted exclusively to this topic (Holt, 1994; Weinstein-Shr & Quintero, 1995; Morrow, 1995). The National Center for Family Literacy (NCFL) estimates that there are now over 1,000 family programs across the United States and argues that it is the best longterm solution to America's poverty problem, better even than school reform for tackling undereducation and all the related social and economic problems (Darling, 1992, p. 1). According to representatives of the U.S. Department of Education, Even Start, the largest family initiative in the United States is not only an important part of the U.S. education agenda for the 1990s but perhaps the key to reaching U.S. educational goals (McKee & Rhett, 1995, p. 166). Other English-speaking countries, influenced by the U.S. movement, have begun family initiatives of their own (RaPAL Bulletin, 1994; Harrison, 1995, Fine Print, 1994; Morrow &Paratore, 1993). Not only has family come to be seen as a state of the art approach to educational reform, but, according to Street (1995), it can be said to have gained the status of a literacy campaign. As such, I think we have come to a point where we need to do some stock-taking—to look at where we have been and where we want to go. Shortly after the appearance of Taylor's book, the first family programs were established, many of which focused on transmitting school practices into the home. At that time, I raised concerns about the dangers of a deficit perspective on family (Auerbach, 1989). In the past 5 years, I think a second generation of family programs has emerged, one in which virtually all of the proponents of family claim to oppose deficit perspectives and to embrace" @default.
• W2126195809 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2126195809 creator A5057450874 @default.
• W2126195809 date "1995-12-01" @default.
• W2126195809 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2126195809 title "Deconstructing the Discourse of Strengths in Family Literacy" @default.
• W2126195809 cites W1910075538 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W1985221318 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W1996566483 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W2016547515 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W2104756855 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W2109690379 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W2122628528 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W2136915972 @default.
• W2126195809 cites W4251501134 @default.
• W2126195809 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969509547903" @default.
• W2126195809 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W2126195809 type Work @default.
• W2126195809 sameAs 2126195809 @default.
• W2126195809 citedByCount "113" @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092012 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092013 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092014 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092015 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092016 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092017 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092018 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092019 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092020 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092021 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092022 @default.
• W2126195809 countsByYear W21261958092023 @default.
• W2126195809 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2126195809 hasAuthorship W2126195809A5057450874 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConcept C547764534 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConceptScore W2126195809C138885662 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConceptScore W2126195809C144024400 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConceptScore W2126195809C15744967 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConceptScore W2126195809C19417346 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConceptScore W2126195809C41895202 @default.
• W2126195809 hasConceptScore W2126195809C547764534 @default.
• W2126195809 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2126195809 hasLocation W21261958091 @default.
• W2126195809 hasOpenAccess W2126195809 @default.
• W2126195809 hasPrimaryLocation W21261958091 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2053487507 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2067108088 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2077865380 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2083375246 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2085372204 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2134894512 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2765597752 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2126195809 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
• W2126195809 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2126195809 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2126195809 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2126195809 magId "2126195809" @default.
• W2126195809 workType "article" @default.