Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2126309517> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2126309517 endingPage "395" @default.
- W2126309517 startingPage "387" @default.
- W2126309517 abstract "Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of dual-source cardiac (DSC) computed tomography (CT) newer-generation CT instruments for identifying anatomically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who are difficult to image by using 64-section CT. Materials and Methods A literature search comprised bibliographic databases (January 1, 2000, to March 22, 2011, with a pragmatic update on September 6, 2012), trial registries, and conference proceedings. Only studies using invasive coronary angiography as reference standard were included. Risk of bias was assessed (QUADAS-2). Results were stratified according to patient group on the basis of clinical characteristics. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of DSC CT for detecting 50% or greater arterial stenosis were calculated by using a bivariate summary receiver operating characteristic or random-effects model. Results Twenty-five studies reported accuracy of DSC CT for diagnosing CAD in difficult to image patients; in 22 studies, one of two CT units of the same manufacturer (Somatom Definition or Somatom Definition Flash) was used, and in the remaining three, a different CT unit of another manufacturer (Aquilion One) was used. The pooled, per-patient estimates of sensitivity were 97.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.0%, 99.9%) and 97.7% (95% CI: 93.2%, 99.3%) for patients with arrhythmias and high heart rates, respectively. The corresponding pooled estimates of specificity were 81.7% (95% CI: 71.6%, 89.4%) and 86.3% (95% CI: 80.2%, 90.7%), respectively. All data were acquired by using Somatom Definition. In two studies with Somatom and one study with Aquilion One, sensitivity estimates of 90% or greater were reported in patients with previous stent implantations; specificities were 81.7% and 89.5% for Somatom and 81.0% for Aquilion One. In patients with high coronary calcium scores, previous bypass grafts, or obesity, only per-segment or per-artery data were available. Sensitivity estimates remained high (>90% in all but one study), and specificities ranged from 79.1% to 100%. All data were acquired by using Somatom Definition. Conclusion DSC CT may be sufficiently accurate to diagnose clinically significant CAD in some or all difficult to image patients. © RSNA, 2013 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.13121136/-/DC1" @default.
- W2126309517 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5001156294 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5005004120 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5019106412 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5038765957 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5059685514 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5065584931 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5074205715 @default.
- W2126309517 creator A5082702320 @default.
- W2126309517 date "2013-05-01" @default.
- W2126309517 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2126309517 title "Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Dual-Source Cardiac CT for Detection of Arterial Stenosis in Difficult to Image Patient Groups" @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1510910840 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1517097129 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1565065535 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1967850431 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1970499939 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1985989454 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1987652158 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W1991887416 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2009797005 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2011567262 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2013144267 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2029770514 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2030236567 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2032610614 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2033956961 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2035664807 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2039013600 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2043612440 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2044767355 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2047363151 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2051976691 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2058125999 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2067065607 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2070948680 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2071017124 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2085739385 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2089238503 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2097015295 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2107638293 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2108717648 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2112030855 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2113578918 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2116308061 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2124856121 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2125843124 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2126727011 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2126747154 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2126930838 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2129815762 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2142062901 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2147493587 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2148360585 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2151198231 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2157206424 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2166918892 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2167402722 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2169160087 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W2333779833 @default.
- W2126309517 cites W3215884784 @default.
- W2126309517 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121136" @default.
- W2126309517 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23392425" @default.
- W2126309517 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2126309517 type Work @default.
- W2126309517 sameAs 2126309517 @default.
- W2126309517 citedByCount "50" @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172013 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172014 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172015 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172016 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172017 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172018 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172019 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172020 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172021 @default.
- W2126309517 countsByYear W21263095172023 @default.
- W2126309517 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5001156294 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5005004120 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5019106412 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5038765957 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5059685514 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5065584931 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5074205715 @default.
- W2126309517 hasAuthorship W2126309517A5082702320 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C3019719930 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C53789813 @default.
- W2126309517 hasConcept C71924100 @default.