FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2126442076> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2126442076 endingPage "72" @default.
• W2126442076 startingPage "68" @default.
• W2126442076 abstract "Abstract In this paper, a study is presented in which statistical methodologies were applied to evaluate the measurement of step gauges on an X-ray computed tomography (CT) system. In particular, the effects of step gauge material density and orientation were investigated. The step gauges consist of uni- and bidirectional lengths. By confirming the repeatability of measurements made on the test system, the number of required scans in the design of experiment (DOE) was reduced. The statistical model was checked using model adequacy principles; model adequacy checking is an important step in validating the applicability of a model to fitting experimental results. If the residuals after fitting the model are normally distributed (normality test), then the residuals represent random errors in the data. If the normality test is not satisfied, the model is said to fit the data poorly. If the model fit to the data were correct, the residuals would approximate the random errors (also called normality). The most common significance level is α  = 0.05; for normality to be satisfied, the P value for the residuals must not be smaller than 0.05. The initial results show that the residuals failed the normality test due to a small P value ( P P value include (1) fitting a different model, (2) evaluating the data differently and (3) excluding outliers. The authors determined that there were too few data to delete outliers. Instead, discussions and conclusions were carried out based on main effect and interaction plots. It means that the conclusions were not based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The following conclusions can be drawn: X-ray scattering is more problematic for dense metal parts. Thus, the statement of “influence of orientation” should be constrained by the material type. But it is important to have in mention that probably the repeatability of the vertical case is much worse. This can be documented experimentally, by tracing back to the fitting quality of the planes. The fitting point deviation of these planes are typically larger when dense metal step gauges are scanned vertically; this can also be done with simulation, as it is “assumed” that the large errors related to “vertical direction” might be caused by X-ray scattering noise, this theory can be tested by simulating CT scans of metal and plastic step gauge without X-ray scattering and see whether “vertical direction” is still worse for aluminium step gauge." @default.
• W2126442076 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2126442076 creator A5054610834 @default.
• W2126442076 creator A5055038868 @default.
• W2126442076 creator A5066436377 @default.
• W2126442076 creator A5068943632 @default.
• W2126442076 creator A5078680165 @default.
• W2126442076 date "2015-11-01" @default.
• W2126442076 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2126442076 title "Performance evaluation of CT measurements made on step gauges using statistical methodologies" @default.
• W2126442076 cites W2049760669 @default.
• W2126442076 cites W2073498690 @default.
• W2126442076 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2015.08.002" @default.
• W2126442076 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2126442076 type Work @default.
• W2126442076 sameAs 2126442076 @default.
• W2126442076 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2126442076 countsByYear W21264420762016 @default.
• W2126442076 countsByYear W21264420762017 @default.
• W2126442076 countsByYear W21264420762019 @default.
• W2126442076 countsByYear W21264420762020 @default.
• W2126442076 countsByYear W21264420762021 @default.
• W2126442076 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2126442076 hasAuthorship W2126442076A5054610834 @default.
• W2126442076 hasAuthorship W2126442076A5055038868 @default.
• W2126442076 hasAuthorship W2126442076A5066436377 @default.
• W2126442076 hasAuthorship W2126442076A5068943632 @default.
• W2126442076 hasAuthorship W2126442076A5078680165 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConceptScore W2126442076C127413603 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConceptScore W2126442076C200601418 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConceptScore W2126442076C201995342 @default.
• W2126442076 hasConceptScore W2126442076C41008148 @default.
• W2126442076 hasLocation W21264420761 @default.
• W2126442076 hasOpenAccess W2126442076 @default.
• W2126442076 hasPrimaryLocation W21264420761 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2347751889 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2359309466 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2359578468 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2366653857 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2373081051 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2375562556 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2387557943 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2391199333 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2126442076 hasRelatedWork W626828566 @default.
• W2126442076 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2126442076 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2126442076 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2126442076 magId "2126442076" @default.
• W2126442076 workType "article" @default.