FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2126640315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2126640315 endingPage "82" @default.
• W2126640315 startingPage "75" @default.
• W2126640315 abstract "Background The aims of this study were to analyze the preliminary clinical effects of arthroscopic reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) using Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) artificial ligament. It is hypothesized that LARS artificial ligament is a safe and effective choice for PCL reconstruction, providing good knee stability. Materials and Methods Forty-one patients who underwent PCL reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament were enrolled in this retrospective study. Average age at time of surgery was 34 y (range, 23–57 y). Average time from injury to surgery was 15 d (range, 5–45 d). Average follow-up period was 44 mo (range, 36–54 months). Follow-up examinations included the Lysholm Knee Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Results The average Lysholm knee score was 64.9 ± 8.8 preoperatively (range, 47-75) versus 92.1 ± 3.3 three years after operation (range, 79–100). Thirty-six of 41 patients (88%) showed good or excellent results at final assessment. The final IKDC score at 3 y postoperatively rated as normal in 21 patients (51%), nearly normal in 17 patients (42%), abnormal in three patients (7%). Conclusions The results shows that LARS artificial ligament appears to be an effective device for PCL reconstruction leading to good ligamentous stability and knee function. Long-term follow-up should be performed to confirm the durable stability of the knee and the tolerance of the knee to the LARS artificial ligament. The aims of this study were to analyze the preliminary clinical effects of arthroscopic reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) using Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) artificial ligament. It is hypothesized that LARS artificial ligament is a safe and effective choice for PCL reconstruction, providing good knee stability. Forty-one patients who underwent PCL reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament were enrolled in this retrospective study. Average age at time of surgery was 34 y (range, 23–57 y). Average time from injury to surgery was 15 d (range, 5–45 d). Average follow-up period was 44 mo (range, 36–54 months). Follow-up examinations included the Lysholm Knee Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. The average Lysholm knee score was 64.9 ± 8.8 preoperatively (range, 47-75) versus 92.1 ± 3.3 three years after operation (range, 79–100). Thirty-six of 41 patients (88%) showed good or excellent results at final assessment. The final IKDC score at 3 y postoperatively rated as normal in 21 patients (51%), nearly normal in 17 patients (42%), abnormal in three patients (7%). The results shows that LARS artificial ligament appears to be an effective device for PCL reconstruction leading to good ligamentous stability and knee function. Long-term follow-up should be performed to confirm the durable stability of the knee and the tolerance of the knee to the LARS artificial ligament." @default.
• W2126640315 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2126640315 creator A5023497303 @default.
• W2126640315 creator A5036248455 @default.
• W2126640315 creator A5037506720 @default.
• W2126640315 creator A5040741186 @default.
• W2126640315 creator A5074812805 @default.
• W2126640315 date "2012-03-01" @default.
• W2126640315 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2126640315 title "Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using LARS Artificial Ligament: A Retrospective Study" @default.
• W2126640315 cites W1932554722 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W1965993608 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W1984129101 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W1986558791 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W1989238334 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2012449298 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2025533983 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2029382427 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2042523639 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2056297889 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2061853190 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2070092120 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2074961732 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2077981514 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2083605131 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2086372186 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2098854516 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2123234616 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2167424140 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2258044576 @default.
• W2126640315 cites W2395791673 @default.
• W2126640315 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.015" @default.
• W2126640315 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20888585" @default.
• W2126640315 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2126640315 type Work @default.
• W2126640315 sameAs 2126640315 @default.
• W2126640315 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152012 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152013 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152014 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152015 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152017 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152018 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152020 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152021 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152022 @default.
• W2126640315 countsByYear W21266403152023 @default.
• W2126640315 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2126640315 hasAuthorship W2126640315A5023497303 @default.
• W2126640315 hasAuthorship W2126640315A5036248455 @default.
• W2126640315 hasAuthorship W2126640315A5037506720 @default.
• W2126640315 hasAuthorship W2126640315A5040741186 @default.
• W2126640315 hasAuthorship W2126640315A5074812805 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C2779699715 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C2779753412 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C2780345532 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C141071460 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C167135981 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C2778434673 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C2779162959 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C2779699715 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C2779753412 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C2780345532 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C60465272 @default.
• W2126640315 hasConceptScore W2126640315C71924100 @default.
• W2126640315 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2126640315 hasLocation W21266403151 @default.
• W2126640315 hasLocation W21266403152 @default.
• W2126640315 hasOpenAccess W2126640315 @default.
• W2126640315 hasPrimaryLocation W21266403151 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W134270990 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W1993440298 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W2045293380 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W2793128021 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W2905776772 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W3024282546 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W4237842343 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W4285448114 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W4316115774 @default.
• W2126640315 hasRelatedWork W4364375720 @default.
• W2126640315 hasVolume "173" @default.
• W2126640315 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2126640315 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2126640315 magId "2126640315" @default.
• W2126640315 workType "article" @default.