Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2127274910> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 items per page.
- W2127274910 endingPage "342" @default.
- W2127274910 startingPage "335" @default.
- W2127274910 abstract "A correlational study was conducted in an effort to examine the validity of brief role-play tests for assessing social skills. Thirty-nine male and 39 female undergraduate students responded to 20 role-played scenarios involving heterosocial interactions. One week later they were surreptitiuously observed while they interacted with an opposite-sex student who, in actuality, was an experimental confederate. Videotapes of the role-play test and a naturalistic interaction were subsequently rated for a variety of component responses. Correlations of responses in the two situations provided equivocal results. Role-play behavior was moderately correlated with behavior in the naturalistic situation for females, but there were few significant relationships for males. Results are discussed in terms of the validity and utility of roleplay tests, and several unresolved issues are identified. Naturalistic observation is the mode of data collection most strongly advocated by behavior therapists. However, economic and pragmatic restrictions frequently preclude the use of this approach. This is especially the case with adult outpatient clients, who typically cannot be followed and observed in vivo. As an alternative second-best approach, numerous analogue procedures have been developed. In general, these techniques entail replication in the laboratory or clinic of some critical part of the natural environment, with the expectation that behavior in this fabricated setting will accurately reflect in vivo functioning. Prototypic examples include the Behavioral Avoidance Test (Lang & Lazovik, 1963), in which the client confronts a phobic stimulus, and the Behavioral Assertiveness Test (Eisler, Miller, & Hersen, 1973), in which the client role plays" @default.
- W2127274910 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2127274910 creator A5003774200 @default.
- W2127274910 creator A5083104099 @default.
- W2127274910 creator A5088779886 @default.
- W2127274910 date "1979-01-01" @default.
- W2127274910 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2127274910 title "Role-play tests for assessing social skills: Are they valid? Are they useful?" @default.
- W2127274910 cites W1976419091 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W1977427974 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2001404602 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2012306593 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2014857301 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2024692051 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2045009124 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2051678225 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2062091567 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2066812885 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2070727023 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2086684615 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2102179953 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2111751226 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2159060341 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W2319424751 @default.
- W2127274910 cites W995643719 @default.
- W2127274910 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.47.2.335" @default.
- W2127274910 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/469081" @default.
- W2127274910 hasPublicationYear "1979" @default.
- W2127274910 type Work @default.
- W2127274910 sameAs 2127274910 @default.
- W2127274910 citedByCount "71" @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102012 @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102014 @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102015 @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102019 @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102020 @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102022 @default.
- W2127274910 countsByYear W21272749102023 @default.
- W2127274910 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2127274910 hasAuthorship W2127274910A5003774200 @default.
- W2127274910 hasAuthorship W2127274910A5083104099 @default.
- W2127274910 hasAuthorship W2127274910A5088779886 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C116211729 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConcept C86772948 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C116211729 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C138496976 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C15744967 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C171606756 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C180747234 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C70410870 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C75630572 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C77805123 @default.
- W2127274910 hasConceptScore W2127274910C86772948 @default.
- W2127274910 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2127274910 hasLocation W21272749101 @default.
- W2127274910 hasLocation W21272749102 @default.
- W2127274910 hasOpenAccess W2127274910 @default.
- W2127274910 hasPrimaryLocation W21272749101 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W1975890018 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2006556498 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2028308686 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2042113573 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2056363762 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2143125787 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2146611318 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W2492342807 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W4254295689 @default.
- W2127274910 hasRelatedWork W4232758585 @default.
- W2127274910 hasVolume "47" @default.
- W2127274910 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2127274910 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2127274910 magId "2127274910" @default.
- W2127274910 workType "article" @default.