FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2128257732> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2128257732 endingPage "585" @default.
• W2128257732 startingPage "577" @default.
• W2128257732 abstract "Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to answer the question: For patients requiring apicoectomy (apicectomy/root‐end resection) and retrograde (root‐end) obturation (filling), which retrograde obturation (root‐end filling) material(s) is/are the most effective, as determined by reduction in periapical radiolucency and elimination of signs and symptoms? Materials and methods A MEDLINE and a Cochrane search (two specified searches) were conducted to identify randomised (RCT) and nonrandomised controlled clinical trials (CCT), cohort studies (CS) and case‐control studies (CCS), published between 1966 and 2002, October week 4, conducted on humans, and published in English, German and French language, relating to retrograde obturation materials following apicoectomy. Results The MEDLINE and the Cochrane search identified 324 and 21 published articles, respectively. The Cochrane search identified three additional articles to the MEDLINE‐search articles. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria: two were RCTs, six were CCTs, none was a CS and six were retrospective CCSs. Nine of the 14 studies compared a new retrograde (root‐end)‐filling material to amalgam, 4 of the 14 studies compared orthograde root canal fillings to retrograde (root‐end) amalgam and the fourteenth study compared variations of a resin composite (Retroplast) when used in combination with the bonding agent Gluma (Bayer AG, Gluma 1 and 2). The two RCTs indicated that glass ionomer cement appeared to be equivalent to amalgam. The six CCTs indicated that orthograde filling with gutta‐percha and sealer was more effective than amalgam retrograde (root‐end)‐filling (one trial). Similarly, retrograde (root‐end)‐filling with (i) composite and Gluma (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) as bonding agent (one trial), (ii) reinforced zinc oxide eugenol cement (EBA cement) (Stailine, Staident, Middlesex, England; one trial) and (iii) gold leaf (one trial) appeared to be better than amalgam retrograde (root‐end)‐filling. Finally, gutta‐percha retrograde (root‐end)‐filling appears to be less effective than amalgam (one trial) and Retroplast with ytterbium trifluoride is better than Retroplast with silver, when they are both used with Gluma as bonding agent (one trial). Conclusions For the highest level of evidence (RCT) retrograde (root‐end)‐filling with glass ionomer cement is almost as effective as amalgam. However, there was a significant caveat as there were only two RCTs. At the next highest level of evidence (CCT), and given the additional caveat that there was only one controlled trial for each material, retrograde (root‐end) EBA cement, composite with Gluma and gold leaf, as well as orthograde gutta‐percha, may be more effective than retrograde (root‐end) amalgam filling. In conclusion, these results suggest that additional validating CCTs and RCTs are needed." @default.
• W2128257732 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2128257732 creator A5012216596 @default.
• W2128257732 creator A5023419142 @default.
• W2128257732 date "2003-09-01" @default.
• W2128257732 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2128257732 title "A systematic review of <i>in vivo</i> retrograde obturation materials" @default.
• W2128257732 cites W1556468392 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W1558147642 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W1970020519 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W1984291126 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W1988819675 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2022542061 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2034997147 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2036379170 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2049291018 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2052689120 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2055728083 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2060009337 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2070362714 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2162777243 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2328009814 @default.
• W2128257732 cites W2916578322 @default.
• W2128257732 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00696.x" @default.
• W2128257732 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12950570" @default.
• W2128257732 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2128257732 type Work @default.
• W2128257732 sameAs 2128257732 @default.
• W2128257732 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322012 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322013 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322014 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322016 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322017 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322018 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322019 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322021 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322022 @default.
• W2128257732 countsByYear W21282577322023 @default.
• W2128257732 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2128257732 hasAuthorship W2128257732A5012216596 @default.
• W2128257732 hasAuthorship W2128257732A5023419142 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C17525397 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2778199621 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2778708630 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2779245719 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C2779847468 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C51795115 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C141071460 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C147789679 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C168563851 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C17525397 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C17744445 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C185592680 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C199343813 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C199539241 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2776478404 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2778199621 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2778708630 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2779245719 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2779473830 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2779747767 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C2779847468 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C51795115 @default.
• W2128257732 hasConceptScore W2128257732C71924100 @default.
• W2128257732 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2128257732 hasLocation W21282577321 @default.
• W2128257732 hasLocation W21282577322 @default.
• W2128257732 hasOpenAccess W2128257732 @default.
• W2128257732 hasPrimaryLocation W21282577321 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W1501335041 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2040014787 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2045628155 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2049345939 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2095579179 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2153154193 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2413239162 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W2465277610 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W3014517891 @default.
• W2128257732 hasRelatedWork W4385153772 @default.
• W2128257732 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2128257732 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2128257732 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2128257732 magId "2128257732" @default.
• W2128257732 workType "article" @default.