FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2128376750> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2128376750 endingPage "600" @default.
• W2128376750 startingPage "595" @default.
• W2128376750 abstract "Comparison of operating outcomes of office hysteroscopic polypectomy accomplished by mechanical or bipolar electrosurgical instrumentation.Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).Public hospital.A total of 101 consecutive postmenopausal patients showing, during office hysteroscopy, 1 or more endometrial polyps measuring more than .5 cm.Hysteroscopy was carried out with a 2.9-mm optic and a 3.9-x5.9-mm sheathed operative hysteroscope, without local anesthesia or systemic analgesia. The diagnostic phase was immediately followed by polyp resection, alternatively allocating the patients to mechanical or electrosurgical polypectomy. Hysteroscopic scissors were used for mechanical polypectomy, whereas 5F coaxial bipolar twizzle electrodes were used for electrosurgical polypectomy.Effectiveness of polypectomy, operation time, and evaluation of induced pelvic pain (scored on a 1-10 cm visual analog scale), were the end points of comparison between the 2 techniques. Nine patients were excluded because of severe pelvic pain arising in the diagnostic phase or the finding of an oversize polyp requiring an estimated time of more than 30 minutes to be removed in the office setting. Of the remaining 92 patients, 46 underwent mechanical and 46 electrosurgical polypectomy. Clinical variables (i.e., age, age at menopause, parity, polyp size, and number) were similar in the 2 study arms. Polypectomy was accomplished in 79 (85.8%) of 92 patients. Among the considered clinical variables, effectiveness of resection was significantly related to age of patients (p=.04) and polyp size (p=.004). Mechanical and electrosurgical polypectomy was completed in 37 (80.4%) of 46 patients and in 42 (91.3%) of 46 patients, respectively (p=.13). Furthermore, mechanical and electrosurgical resections did not significantly differ as regards median surgical time (15.0 min [range 5-45] and 15.5 min [range 8-40], respectively; p=.53) and visual analog scale scores (3.7+/-2.5 and 3.2+/-1.9, respectively; p=.48). No major complications were recorded. Atypical polyp histology occurred in 9 (8.8%) patients, 5 of whom were asymptomatic.Outpatient see-and-treat polypectomy represents a safe and effective alternative to resectoscopic polypectomy, leading to a complete polyp excision in about 80% of postmenopausal patients. No differences in the rate of polyp excision, surgical time, or induced pelvic discomfort were observed between electrosurgical and mechanical techniques." @default.
• W2128376750 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2128376750 creator A5022003163 @default.
• W2128376750 creator A5071808237 @default.
• W2128376750 creator A5076220089 @default.
• W2128376750 date "2008-09-01" @default.
• W2128376750 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2128376750 title "Outpatient Hysteroscopic Polypectomy in Postmenopausal Women: A Comparison between Mechanical and Electrosurgical Resection" @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1965058359 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1979572943 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1980405714 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1981192373 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1984644044 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1986027263 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W1986826083 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2002846464 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2012475706 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2015398614 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2016146313 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2026867246 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2029101415 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2039622642 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2041559560 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2041665012 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2048255553 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2049497868 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2051533952 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2053648993 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2056582462 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2071228412 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2075582874 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2076142496 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2080253228 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2112131339 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2123744074 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2142533952 @default.
• W2128376750 cites W2405850979 @default.
• W2128376750 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2008.07.001" @default.
• W2128376750 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18722972" @default.
• W2128376750 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2128376750 type Work @default.
• W2128376750 sameAs 2128376750 @default.
• W2128376750 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502012 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502013 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502014 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502015 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502016 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502017 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502018 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502019 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502020 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502021 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502022 @default.
• W2128376750 countsByYear W21283767502023 @default.
• W2128376750 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2128376750 hasAuthorship W2128376750A5022003163 @default.
• W2128376750 hasAuthorship W2128376750A5071808237 @default.
• W2128376750 hasAuthorship W2128376750A5076220089 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C2775963564 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C2778842199 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C2780581329 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C2909633097 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C3020110884 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C121608353 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C126322002 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C141071460 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C14184104 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C2775963564 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C2778435480 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C2778451229 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C2778842199 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C2780581329 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C2909633097 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C3020110884 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C526805850 @default.
• W2128376750 hasConceptScore W2128376750C71924100 @default.
• W2128376750 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2128376750 hasLocation W21283767501 @default.
• W2128376750 hasLocation W21283767502 @default.
• W2128376750 hasOpenAccess W2128376750 @default.
• W2128376750 hasPrimaryLocation W21283767501 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2049497868 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2051207312 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2128376750 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2140616362 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2163079942 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2194646639 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2312351731 @default.
• W2128376750 hasRelatedWork W2463115277 @default.

• next