FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2128601968> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2128601968 endingPage "1318" @default.
• W2128601968 startingPage "1318" @default.
• W2128601968 abstract "Back to table of contents Previous article Next article LettersFull AccessReducing Assaults Among Hospitalized YouthsEileen P. Ryan, D.O., Jeffrey Aaron, Ph.D., and Virginia Sparrow Hart, Ph.D.Eileen P. RyanSearch for more papers by this author, D.O., Jeffrey AaronSearch for more papers by this author, Ph.D., and Virginia Sparrow HartSearch for more papers by this author, Ph.D.Published Online:1 Nov 2004https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1318AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail In Reply: Dr. Whelan raises several important points in his comments about our article. Caregivers, teachers, and hospital staff members often see oppositional behaviors as best met by behavioral contingencies designed to operantly teach adaptive behaviors. Such responses overlook the fact that such behaviors in children and adolescents, who are typically hospitalized because of significant problems with impulsivity, affect regulation, and behavioral dyscontrol, often reflect expressions of frustration, efforts to demonstrate autonomy, a desire for engagement, or some other meaningful interpersonal transaction.We appreciate Dr. Whelan's noting the importance of considering behavioral management systems as possible catalysts in negative interactions between patients and staff on a unit. We also agree with his observations and conclusion that the transactional nature of patient-staff interactions is typically not addressed in an effective manner. As clinicians who have worked in inpatient settings and have also observed firsthand the limitations of level-based behavioral management systems, we were still surprised by the high rate of assault on staff. In the hospital in which this study took place, there have been ongoing and successful efforts to decrease seclusion and restraint. However, we wonder whether such efforts may inevitably plateau in their success and even have the unfortunate side effect of facilitating other forms of dyscontrol within the confines of traditional level-based behavioral management systems.One of us attended a workshop at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in October 2003 (1) in which Ross Greene discussed CPS (2) and its role in eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint in an inpatient setting very similar to the one in our study. One of the many reasons that we perceive the CPS approach to be effective is that it addresses the main reason that people choose to work with difficult children for low pay—to help them. As Dr. Whelan states, CPS emphasizes discovering the specific pattern of cognitive skill deficits implicated in a given child's inability to comply and works to remediate these deficits. Our observation has been that efforts to address the transactional component between staff and patients often convey to staff that they are doing something wrong and that they are somehow inappropriately implementing the otherwise effective unit management program. CPS focuses on therapeutic interactions rather than on limit setting, in which there is inevitably a winner and a loser.Dr. Whelan suggests that it would have been of value to record situation-specific, verbatim data for the verbal reprimands given to patients. Again, he makes a good point. However, such an effort would capture only one element of the transaction in the microclimate of the inpatient unit. There are many other facets of the interaction that would likely affect the transaction, such as a staff member's reputation with patients on the unit, the tone of voice used, the staff member's familiarity with that patient, and the patient's familiarity with the level system.References1. Hassuk B, Greene W, Regan K, et al: Elimination of Restraint and Seclusion in Inpatient Child Psychiatry. Workshop presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Miami Beach, Florida, October 14–19, 2003Google Scholar2. Greene RW, Ablon JS, Goring JC: A transactional model of oppositional behavior: underpinnings of the collaborative problem solving approach. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 55:67–75, 2003Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited ByNone Volume 55Issue 11 November 2004Pages 1318-1318 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 November 2004 Published in print 1 November 2004" @default.
• W2128601968 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2128601968 creator A5003563408 @default.
• W2128601968 creator A5029109309 @default.
• W2128601968 creator A5065894801 @default.
• W2128601968 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W2128601968 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2128601968 title "Reducing Assaults Among Hospitalized Youths" @default.
• W2128601968 doi "https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1318" @default.
• W2128601968 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2128601968 type Work @default.
• W2128601968 sameAs 2128601968 @default.
• W2128601968 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2128601968 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2128601968 hasAuthorship W2128601968A5003563408 @default.
• W2128601968 hasAuthorship W2128601968A5029109309 @default.
• W2128601968 hasAuthorship W2128601968A5065894801 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C2778825724 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C2779448149 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C2780319597 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C118552586 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C15744967 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C164850336 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C17744445 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C18903297 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C199539241 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C2778825724 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C2779448149 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C2780319597 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C65414064 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C77805123 @default.
• W2128601968 hasConceptScore W2128601968C86803240 @default.
• W2128601968 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2128601968 hasLocation W21286019681 @default.
• W2128601968 hasOpenAccess W2128601968 @default.
• W2128601968 hasPrimaryLocation W21286019681 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W1978667473 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2024677146 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2028400512 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2063463826 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2072767864 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2090260603 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2113178564 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2132189793 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W2619559942 @default.
• W2128601968 hasRelatedWork W3122846767 @default.
• W2128601968 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2128601968 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2128601968 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2128601968 magId "2128601968" @default.
• W2128601968 workType "article" @default.