FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2128614409> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2128614409 abstract "BackgroundRecruitment of sufficient participants in an efficient manner is still widely acknowledged to be a major challenge to the mounting and completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Few recruitment interventions have involved staff undertaking recruitment. This study aimed i) to understand the recruitment process from the perspective of recruiters actively recruiting RCT participants in six pragmatic RCTs, and ii) to identify opportunities for interventions to improve recruitment.MethodsInterviews were undertaken with 72 individuals (32 doctors or RCT Chief investigators (CIs); 40 nurses/other health professionals) who were actively recruiting participants in six RCTs to explore their experiences of recruitment. The RCTs varied in scale, duration, and clinical contexts. Interviews were fully transcribed and analysed using qualitative content and thematic analytic methods derived from grounded theory. For this analysis, data were systematically extracted from each RCT and synthesised across all six RCTs to produce a detailed and nuanced understanding of the recruitment process from the perspectives of the recruiters.ResultsRecruiters readily identified organisational difficulties, fewer than expected eligible patients, and patients’ treatment preferences as the key barriers to recruitment. As they described their experiences of recruitment, several previously hidden issues related to their roles as researchers and clinicians emerged, imbued with discomfort and emotion. The synthesis across the RCTs showed that doctors were uncomfortable about aspects of patient eligibility and the effectiveness of interventions, whereas nurses were anxious about approaching potential RCT participants and conflicts between the research and their clinical responsibilities. Recruiters seemed unaware that their views contributed to recruitment difficulties. Their views were not known to RCT CIs. Training and support needs were identified for both groups of staff.ConclusionsThe synthesis showed that recruitment to these RCTs was a complex and fragile process. Clear obstacles were identified but hidden challenges related to recruiters’ roles undermined recruitment, unbeknown to RCT CIs. Qualitative research can elicit and identify the hidden challenges. Training and support are then needed for recruiters to become more comfortable with the design and principles of RCTs, so that they can engage more openly with potentially eligible participants and create a more resilient recruitment process." @default.
• W2128614409 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2128614409 creator A5006382161 @default.
• W2128614409 creator A5025085243 @default.
• W2128614409 creator A5032968318 @default.
• W2128614409 creator A5049636639 @default.
• W2128614409 date "2014-01-06" @default.
• W2128614409 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2128614409 title "Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials" @default.
• W2128614409 cites W1495377470 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W181033957 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W1969382202 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W1971663556 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W1987611585 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2011524302 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2057937065 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2069116415 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2072632162 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2082450357 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2087571465 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2087810839 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2089948140 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2093268394 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2098415625 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2101242160 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2102521213 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2118907870 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2121671594 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2127837815 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2130777654 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2133469067 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2141791438 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2158470102 @default.
• W2128614409 cites W2577038299 @default.
• W2128614409 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-5" @default.
• W2128614409 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3892115" @default.
• W2128614409 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24393291" @default.
• W2128614409 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2128614409 type Work @default.
• W2128614409 sameAs 2128614409 @default.
• W2128614409 citedByCount "188" @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092014 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092015 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092016 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092017 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092018 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092019 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092020 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092021 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092022 @default.
• W2128614409 countsByYear W21286144092023 @default.
• W2128614409 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2128614409 hasAuthorship W2128614409A5006382161 @default.
• W2128614409 hasAuthorship W2128614409A5025085243 @default.
• W2128614409 hasAuthorship W2128614409A5032968318 @default.
• W2128614409 hasAuthorship W2128614409A5049636639 @default.
• W2128614409 hasBestOaLocation W21286144091 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C141071460 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C144024400 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C156325361 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C15744967 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C159110408 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C168563851 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C190248442 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C27415008 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C36289849 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C71924100 @default.
• W2128614409 hasConceptScore W2128614409C74196892 @default.
• W2128614409 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2128614409 hasLocation W21286144091 @default.
• W2128614409 hasLocation W21286144092 @default.
• W2128614409 hasLocation W21286144093 @default.
• W2128614409 hasLocation W21286144094 @default.
• W2128614409 hasOpenAccess W2128614409 @default.
• W2128614409 hasPrimaryLocation W21286144091 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W1951939026 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W2003545499 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W2024989189 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W2059148590 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W2147954254 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W2223222740 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W2623760453 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W3012405397 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W3040949820 @default.
• W2128614409 hasRelatedWork W3159850672 @default.
• W2128614409 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2128614409 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2128614409 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2128614409 magId "2128614409" @default.

• next