FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2129184411> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2129184411 endingPage "369" @default.
• W2129184411 startingPage "361" @default.
• W2129184411 abstract "The first evaluation of the upper extremity and hand, performed by the surgeon at the outpatient clinic, is fundamental to understanding the patient's problem, determining the best treatment options, and, in the case of a surgical indication, assessing the preoperative status. In addition to recording the patient's symptoms and complaints, the surgeon evaluates anatomic integrity, stability, mobility, trophicity, strength, and sensibility. In many patients, especially patients with severe handicaps or those who anticipate long delays in rehabilitation, in litigation problems, or as part of prospective clinical research, this classic evaluation is not sufficient. The authors recommend that to accommodate these patients, a laboratory of functional evaluation of the hand should be established. The evaluation, performed by independent reviewers, ideally includes techniques allowing objective measurements of kinematics, strength, sensibility, and global hand function and dexterity. Pain assessment using the VAS is indispensable. The results may be presented as scores based on to the patient's problem. The researchers should analyze precisely how the scores were constructed. Questionnaires are part of the evaluation armamentarium. As with other tools, questionnaires allow us to understand better what our patients experience. They do not replace physical examination. Questionnaires also could be used for routine screening in a general upper limb practice, even before the patient sees the hand surgeon. The choice of the questionnaire is important; the reviewer should make sure that the patient understands all questions, that the questions are not redundant, and that they do apply to the patient. Generic health status instruments such as the SF-36 allow comparison across a variety of health problems, including mental and physical conditions, but are not sensitive to upper extremity disability. The DASH questionnaire seems a better choice, allowing a standardized outcome evaluation. Dedicated questionnaires have been developed for specific conditions (eg, carpal tunnel syndrome). As discussed by Amadio, questionnaires are easier to perform than physical testing, can be self-administered, and require no special equipment, saving the cost of an examiner, avoiding the complexities of scheduling a follow-up examination, and eliminating the possibility of observer bias. The patient is less likely to offer polite but incorrect responses. Questionnaires are especially useful when patient's perceptions are important to assess. Questionnaires also could be used in longitudinal studies to assess improvement or aggravation. The use of questionnaires is therefore especially indicated in studies involving a large number of patients, when observer bias and costs are concerns, and when the main outcome measurements are satisfaction, symptoms, or functional status. Amadio has pointed out that questionnaires are not the best tool to measure anatomic or physiologic impairments." @default.
• W2129184411 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5001212946 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5015781336 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5020001985 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5028918300 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5051163002 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5052382097 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5055322729 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5061243118 @default.
• W2129184411 creator A5077146690 @default.
• W2129184411 date "2003-08-01" @default.
• W2129184411 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2129184411 title "Functional and outcome evaluation of the hand and wrist" @default.
• W2129184411 cites W1974884549 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W1979381657 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W1988249974 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W1988764089 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2016900251 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2027798593 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2037984218 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2046989438 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2057622056 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2060149862 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2064720448 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2076602472 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2080155238 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2092725559 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2093909135 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2095398479 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2098314837 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2106135685 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2124646759 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2126410979 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2127058142 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2129636879 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2147537121 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2150377764 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2164111473 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2275744032 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2287737113 @default.
• W2129184411 cites W2433776280 @default.
• W2129184411 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0712(03)00026-x" @default.
• W2129184411 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12945632" @default.
• W2129184411 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2129184411 type Work @default.
• W2129184411 sameAs 2129184411 @default.
• W2129184411 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112012 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112013 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112014 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112015 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112016 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112017 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112018 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112019 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112020 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112021 @default.
• W2129184411 countsByYear W21291844112022 @default.
• W2129184411 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5001212946 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5015781336 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5020001985 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5028918300 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5051163002 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5052382097 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5055322729 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5061243118 @default.
• W2129184411 hasAuthorship W2129184411A5077146690 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C2776660947 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C3020110884 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C50816716 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C126322002 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C141071460 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C1862650 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C19527891 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C2776660947 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C2778216619 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C2778818304 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C3020110884 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C50816716 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C527108885 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C71924100 @default.
• W2129184411 hasConceptScore W2129184411C99508421 @default.
• W2129184411 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2129184411 hasLocation W21291844111 @default.
• W2129184411 hasLocation W21291844112 @default.
• W2129184411 hasOpenAccess W2129184411 @default.
• W2129184411 hasPrimaryLocation W21291844111 @default.

• next