FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2129437017> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2129437017 endingPage "658" @default.
• W2129437017 startingPage "657" @default.
• W2129437017 abstract "HomeRadiologyVol. 267, No. 2 PreviousNext CommunicationsLetters to the EditorDensity and Breast Cancer RiskJennifer A. Harvey* , Martin J. Yaffe†Jennifer A. Harvey* , Martin J. Yaffe†Author AffiliationsDepartment of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908* Department of Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont, Canada† e-mail: [email protected]Jennifer A. Harvey* Martin J. Yaffe†Published Online:May 1 2013https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122477MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1 Hooley RJ , Greenberg KL , Stackhouse RM , Geisel JL , Butler RS , Philpotts LE . Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265(1):59–69. Link, Google Scholar2 D’Orsi CJ , Sickles EA . To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology 2012;265(1):9–11. Link, Google Scholar3 Pawluczyk O , Augustine BJ , Yaffe MJ , et al. . A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 2003;30(3):352–364. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Alonzo-Proulx O , Packard N , Boone JM , et al. . Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(11):3027–3044. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Jeffreys M , Warren R , Highnam R , Smith GD . Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. Br J Radiol 2006;79(941):378–382. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Kaufhold J , Thomas JA , Eberhard JW , Galbo CE , Trotter DE . A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. Med Phys 2002; 29(8):1867–1880. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 van Engeland S , Snoeren PR , Huisman H , Boetes C , Karssemeijer N . Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(3):273–282. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Lam PB , Vacek PM , Geller BM , Muss HB . The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont. Cancer 2000;89(2):369–375. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished online: May 2013Published in print: May 2013 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByIdentifying women with increased risk of breast cancer and implementing risk-reducing strategies and supplemental imagingSuneelaVegunta, Asha A.Bhatt, Sadia A.Choudhery, SandhyaPruthi, Aparna S.Kaur2022 | Breast Cancer, Vol. 29, No. 1Opinions on the Assessment of Breast Density Among Members of the Society of Breast ImagingZiZhang, Emily FConant, SamanthaZuckerman2022 | Journal of Breast Imaging, Vol. 4, No. 5Management of Radiographic Lesions of the BreastLisaWiechmann, Lauren CanterFriedlander2022 | Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 102, No. 6Beyond BI-RADS Density: A Call for Quantification in the Breast Imaging ClinicEmily F. Conant, Brian L. Sprague, Despina Kontos, 22 January 2018 | Radiology, Vol. 286, No. 2Biomarkers and Imaging of Breast CancerOlenaWeaver, Jessica W. T.Leung2018 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 210, No. 2Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated MeasuresEmily F. Conant, Brad M. Keller, Lauren Pantalone, Aimilia Gastounioti, Elizabeth S. McDonald, Despina Kontos, 25 January 2017 | Radiology, Vol. 283, No. 3Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systemsWei-WeiRen, Xiao-LongLi, Ya-PingHe, Dan-DanLi, DanWang, Chong-KeZhao, Xiao-WanBo, Bo-JiLiu, Wen-WenYue, Hui-XiongXu2017 | Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, Vol. 66, No. 1Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR ImagingSaid Pertuz, Elizabeth S. McDonald, Susan P. Weinstein, Emily F. Conant, Despina Kontos, 21 October 2015 | Radiology, Vol. 279, No. 1Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performanceDan-DanLi, Hui-XiongXu, Le-HangGuo, Xiao-WanBo, Xiao-LongLi, RongWu, Jun-MeiXu, Yi-FengZhang, KunZhang2016 | European Radiology, Vol. 26, No. 9Breast Density Evaluation Using Spectral Mammography, Radiologist Reader Assessment, and Segmentation TechniquesSabeeMolloi, HuanjunDing, StephenFeig2015 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 22, No. 8The Evolution of Breast Imaging: Past to PresentBonnie N. Joe, Edward A. Sickles, 23 October 2014 | Radiology, Vol. 273, No. 2SPostmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammographySabeeMolloi, Justin L.Ducote, HuanjunDing, Stephen A.Feig2014 | Medical Physics, Vol. 41, No. 8Part1Recommended Articles Comparative Benefit-to–Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with TomosynthesisRadiology: Imaging Cancer2019Volume: 1Issue: 1Lessons Learned from the Randomized Controlled TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography (TOSYMA) TrialRadiology2022Volume: 306Issue: 2Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Deep LearningRadiology2021Volume: 301Issue: 3pp. 559-560Tomosynthesis Is Taking Small Steps to Become the Standard for Breast Cancer ScreeningRadiology2021Volume: 299Issue: 3pp. 568-570Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening for Breast Cancer: It Is Cost-effective!Radiology2020Volume: 297Issue: 1pp. 49-50See More RSNA Education Exhibits Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM): How Does It Work?Digital Posters2019Non-Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Screening for Women with Dense BreastsDigital Posters2019New Horizons: Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Digital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Left breast hamartomaRSNA Case Collection2020Hyperplastic Residual Breast TissueRSNA Case Collection2022Lactating BreastRSNA Case Collection2022 Vol. 267, No. 2 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W2129437017 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2129437017 creator A5069586144 @default.
• W2129437017 creator A5091356804 @default.
• W2129437017 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W2129437017 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2129437017 title "Density and Breast Cancer Risk" @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2009183362 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2010517573 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2013959342 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2043649569 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2046164439 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2046487712 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2107945302 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2111202332 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2145872944 @default.
• W2129437017 cites W2157425993 @default.
• W2129437017 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122477" @default.
• W2129437017 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23610099" @default.
• W2129437017 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2129437017 type Work @default.
• W2129437017 sameAs 2129437017 @default.
• W2129437017 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172014 @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172015 @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172016 @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172017 @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172018 @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172021 @default.
• W2129437017 countsByYear W21294370172022 @default.
• W2129437017 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2129437017 hasAuthorship W2129437017A5069586144 @default.
• W2129437017 hasAuthorship W2129437017A5091356804 @default.
• W2129437017 hasBestOaLocation W21294370171 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C3018951153 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C121608353 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C126322002 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C17744445 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C19527891 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C199539241 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C2779473830 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C2780472235 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C3018951153 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C530470458 @default.
• W2129437017 hasConceptScore W2129437017C71924100 @default.
• W2129437017 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2129437017 hasLocation W21294370171 @default.
• W2129437017 hasLocation W21294370172 @default.
• W2129437017 hasOpenAccess W2129437017 @default.
• W2129437017 hasPrimaryLocation W21294370171 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W1980590918 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W2058114743 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W2093536466 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W2185659136 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W2351602178 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W2715581621 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W3026273959 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W4313474308 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W4322770599 @default.
• W2129437017 hasRelatedWork W4377087104 @default.
• W2129437017 hasVolume "267" @default.
• W2129437017 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2129437017 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2129437017 magId "2129437017" @default.
• W2129437017 workType "article" @default.