FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2129979568> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2129979568 endingPage "239" @default.
• W2129979568 startingPage "221" @default.
• W2129979568 abstract "Purpose – Managers are confronted with increasing information overload and growing pressure for effective and efficient decision making. The visualisation of data represents a way to overcome this dilemma and to improve management decision quality. The purpose of this paper is to transfer insights from visualisation research to the managerial accounting context and clarify the impact of visualisation on management accounting reports and decision making. The authors deduce implications for behavioural management accounting research, teaching, and business practice from previous findings and the results. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted an experiment with students and experienced managers. Participants had to evaluate eight different business units based on four accounts (sales, EBIT, FPY, and delivery reliability). The information the authors provided to the participants was either presented as tables only, or in tables and graphs. Findings – The empirical results show that supplementary graphs improve decision quality, especially within the manager sample but do not affect decision confidence in a performance evaluation task. The authors furthermore find that managers perform poorly when only provided with tables, and they achieve the overall best score when provided with both tables and graphs, whereas students perform similarly in both conditions. The authors additionally show that proficiency affects not only decision quality but also decision confidence. Research limitations/implications – The results differ from predictions based solely on the cognitive fit model, as the authors found differences in decision quality to be stronger within the group of managers. The cognitive fit model proposes that decision making performance will improve when the problem representation and the decision making task match. Applying the model to a management context, it is obviously insufficient to explain the differences the authors obtained in the experiment. The authors observed that proficiency plays a role in such performance evaluation tasks. Practical implications – Based on the results, management accountants should analyse the task that needs to be solved with the reported data. By analysing the type of task, accountants can derive the information processing strategy that will most likely be used by executives for problem solving and determine the suitable visualisation format based on the cognitive fit model. Moderate or complex monitoring tasks will presumably be accessed with perceptual information processing. Data should thus be visualised with graphs. Originality/value – The authors provide empirical evidence that supplementary graphs in management reports improve decision quality but not decision confidence. The authors furthermore illustrate the limits of the explaining power of the cognitive fit model in a management report context. In an extension of cognitive fit theory, the authors argue that proficiency plays a crucial role in performance evaluation tasks. The authors propose a process for visualisation of management reports based on their findings and previous findings." @default.
• W2129979568 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2129979568 creator A5007421782 @default.
• W2129979568 creator A5065895514 @default.
• W2129979568 creator A5076248712 @default.
• W2129979568 date "2015-09-14" @default.
• W2129979568 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2129979568 title "Visualisation of data in management accounting reports" @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1499449570 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1964253918 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1969830204 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1972031841 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1972943117 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1979828126 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1986864424 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W1987192255 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2006148096 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2011750174 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2013356846 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2025729084 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2033318458 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2033793773 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2033795299 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2040989939 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2043826225 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2052838241 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2053229400 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2053236467 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2066253198 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2071270727 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2078699617 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2078797391 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2086751429 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2088261374 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2088554417 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2093543952 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2106279127 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2108172669 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2114791422 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2119663117 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2123334556 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2143579043 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2153567945 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2153703610 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2155446637 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2159593279 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2160592232 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W2884628008 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3121597472 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3121804248 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3121860914 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3122780443 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3122997370 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3123502919 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3124405266 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W3141789851 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W4211191998 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W4254376918 @default.
• W2129979568 cites W634106523 @default.
• W2129979568 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-08-2012-0059" @default.
• W2129979568 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2129979568 type Work @default.
• W2129979568 sameAs 2129979568 @default.
• W2129979568 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682016 @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682017 @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682019 @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682020 @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682021 @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682022 @default.
• W2129979568 countsByYear W21299795682023 @default.
• W2129979568 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2129979568 hasAuthorship W2129979568A5007421782 @default.
• W2129979568 hasAuthorship W2129979568A5065895514 @default.
• W2129979568 hasAuthorship W2129979568A5076248712 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C2779351106 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C36464697 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C57035238 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C74275925 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConceptScore W2129979568C111472728 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConceptScore W2129979568C121955636 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConceptScore W2129979568C124101348 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConceptScore W2129979568C138885662 @default.
• W2129979568 hasConceptScore W2129979568C144133560 @default.

• next