FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2130461965> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2130461965 endingPage "30" @default.
• W2130461965 startingPage "30" @default.
• W2130461965 abstract "No AccessPerspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and DiagnosticsArticle1 Nov 2010The Role of Central Auditory and Cognitive Processing Ability in Speech Perception for Elderly Listeners Kathleen M. Cienkowski and Kristin Vasil-Dilaj Kathleen M. Cienkowski Department of Communication Sciences, University of ConnecticutStorrs, CT Google Scholar More articles by this author and Kristin Vasil-Dilaj Department of Communication Sciences, University of ConnecticutStorrs, CT Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/hhd14.2.30 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract The purpose of this article is to describe the factors that influence speech perception for elderly listeners. Factors included in the review are changes to the peripheral and central auditory system as well as the overall cognitive system with an emphasis on the latter two areas. These factors occur in a variety of listening environments and have important implications for evaluation and rehabilitation for older clients. Specifically, the review will investigate if central and cognitive measures account for a significant amount of variance for subjective and objective speech in noise tasks. References ANSI S3.5-1997 (R2007). Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. ANSI S3.5-1997. New York, NY: Author. Google Scholar Bertoli, S., Smurzynski, J., & Probst, R. (2002). Temporal resolution in young and elderly subjects as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap detection tasks.Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(3), 396–406. Google Scholar Bess, F. H., & Strouse, A. L. (1996). Presbycusis.In J. L. Northern (Ed.), Hearing disorders (3rd ed.; pp. 199–212). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar Cienkowski, K. M. (2001). [Speech understanding in older listener with and without hearing loss]. Unpublished raw data. Google Scholar Cienkowski, K. M. ( 2005, November). Can CAP measures help set your hearing aids?. Technical session presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar Cienkowski, K. M., & Vasil, K. ( 2006, April). The role of cognitive and auditory processing measures in hearing aid fitting. Technical session presented at the 40th Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, Louisville, KY. Google Scholar Cruicksanks, K. J. ( 2010, April). Age-related hearing loss: Demographics and risk factors. Paper presented at the Academy Research Conference (ARC) 2010, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar Divenyi, P. L., Stark, P. B., & Haupt, K. M. (2005). Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(2), 1089–1100. Google Scholar Dubno, J., Dirks, D., & Morgan, D. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(1), 87–96. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Etholm, B., & Belal, A., Jr. (1974). Senile changes in the middle ear joints.Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 83(1), 49–54. Google Scholar Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990) Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725–1736. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Wightman, F. L. (1982). Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(3), 761–65. Google Scholar Fletcher, H. (1953). Speech and hearing in communication. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand. Google Scholar French, N. R., & Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 90–119. Google Scholar Gates, G. A., Cooper, J. C., Kannel, W. B., & Miller, N. J. (1990). Hearing in the elderly: The Framingham cohort, 1983-1985.Ear and Hearing, 11, 247–256. Google Scholar Golding, M., Doyle, K., Sindhusake, D., Mitchell, P., Newall, P., & Hartley, D. J. (2007). Tympanometric and acoustic stapedius reflex measures in older adults: The blue mountains hearing study.American Academy of Audiology, 18(5), 391–403. Google Scholar Gordon-Salant, S.A. (2005). Hearing loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications.Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42(4) Suppl. 2, 9–24. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Gordon-Salant, S. A., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2001). Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech.Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 709–19. LinkGoogle Scholar Gordon-Salant, S. A., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2004). Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 11, 1808–17. Google Scholar Guest, J. F., Greener, M. J., Robinson, A. C., & Smith, A. F. (2004). Impacted cerumen: Composition, production, epidemiology and management.Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 97, 477–488. Google Scholar Hari, R., Hamalainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Kaukoranta, E., Reinikainen, K., Salminen, J., … et al.. (1984). Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man.Neuroscience Letters, 50, 127–132. Google Scholar Humes, L. E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 161–167. MedlineGoogle Scholar Humes, L. E., & Christopherson, L. (1991). Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: The contributions of auditory-processing deficits.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 686–693. AbstractGoogle Scholar Humes, L. E., & Dubno, J. R. (2009). Factors affecting speech understanding in older adults.In S. A. Gordan-Salant, R. Friscina, A. Popper, & R. Fay (Eds.), The aging auditory system (pp. 211–258). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar Humes, L. E., & Roberts, L. (1990). Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: The contributions of audibility.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 726–735. LinkGoogle Scholar Irwin, R. J., & McAuley, S. F. (1987). Relations among temporal acuity, hearing loss, and the perception of speech distorted by noise and reverberation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(5), 1557–65. Google Scholar Jerger, J., Mahurin, R., & Pirozzolo, F. (1990). The seperability of central auditory and cognitive deficits: Implications for the elderly.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1, 116–119. Google Scholar Jerger, J., Stach, B., Pruitt, J., Harper, R., & Kirby, H. (1989). Comments on “Speech understanding and aging.”.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(3), 1352–1354. Google Scholar Kausler, D. M. (1994). Learning and memory in normal aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar Kochkin, S. (2005). MarkeTrak VII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age.Hearing Journal, 58(9), 30–43. Google Scholar Levitt, H. (1978). Acoustics of speech production.In M. Ross, & T. G. Giolas (Eds.), Auditory management of hearing impaired children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press. Google Scholar Martin, J. S., & Jerger, J. (2005). Some effects of aging on central auditory processing.Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42(4) Suppl. 2, 25–44. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure.Psychophysiology, 24, 375–425. Google Scholar Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003). Processing speed and timing in aging adults: Psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension.International Journal of Audiology, 42. Supplement 1, S59–67. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Schow, R. L. (2002). Audiologic rehabilitation for adults and elderly adults: Assessment and management.In R. L. Schow, & M. A. Nerbonne (Eds.) Introduction to audiologic rehabilitation (4th ed.,; pp. 335–397). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Singh, G. (2006). Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.Trends in Amplification, 10(1), 29–59. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Channel capacity, intelligibility, and intermediate memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 241–248. Google Scholar Ryalls, J. (1996). A basic introduction to speech perception, speech science series. San Diego, CA: Singular Thomson Learning. Google Scholar Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult aging differences in cognition.Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. Google Scholar Saunders, G. H., & Cienkowski, K. M. (2002). A test to measure subjective and objective speech intelligibility.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13(1), 38–49. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Schneider, B. A., & Hamstra, S. J. (1999). Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(1), 371–80. Google Scholar Schmiedt, R. (2009). The physiology of cochlear presbycusis.In S. A. Gordan-Salant, R. Friscina, A. Popper, & R. Fay (Eds.), The aging auditory system (pp. 9–38). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar Schuknecht, H. F., & Gacek, M. R. (1993). Cochlear pathology in presbycusis.Annals of Otology, Rhinololgy and Laryngology, 102, 1–16. Google Scholar Shadden, B. B., & Toner, M. A. (1997). Introduction: The continuum of life functions.In B. B. Shadden, & M. A. Toner (Eds.), Aging and communication for clinicians by clinicians (pp. 3–18). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Snell, K. B. (1997). Age-related changes in temporal gap detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2214–20. MedlineGoogle Scholar Snell, K. B., & Frisina, D. R. (2000). Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(3), 1615–26. Google Scholar Souza, P. E., & Turner, C. W. (1994). Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 655–61. LinkGoogle Scholar Stach, B. A., Spretnjak, M. L., & Jerger, J. (1990). The prevalence of central presbyacusis in a clinical population.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1, 109–115. MedlineGoogle Scholar Strouse, A., Ashmead, D. H., Ohde, R. N., & Grantham, D. W. (1998). Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2385–2399. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Studebaker, G. A., Sherbecoe, R. L., McDaniel, D. M., & Gray, G.A. (1997). Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8, 150–62. MedlineGoogle Scholar Surprenant, A. M. (2007). Effects of noise on identification and serial recall of nonsense syllables in older and younger adults.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 126–141. Google Scholar Tremblay, K. L., Piskosz, M., & Souza, P. (2003). Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues.Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1332–1343. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Tun, P. A., McCoy, S., & Wingfield, A. (2009). Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening.Psychology and Aging, 24(5), 761–6. Google Scholar Tyler, R. S., Summerfield, A. Q., Wood, E. J., & Fernandes, M. (1982). Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 740–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar United Nations. (2001). World population ageing: 1950-2050. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Google Scholar U.S. Census Bureau. International database. Table 094. Midyear population, by age and sex. Available at http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/natdet-D1A.html Google Scholar Wiley, T. L., Cruickshanks, K. J., Nondahl, D. M., Tweed, T. S., Klein, R., & Klein, B. K. (1998). Aging and word recognition in competing message.Journal of the American Academy of Audiololgy, 9,191–98. Google Scholar Wingfield, A. (1996). Cognitive factors in auditory performance: Context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 175–182. MedlineGoogle Scholar Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., & McCoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 144–148. Google Scholar Working Group on Speech Understanding & Aging & the Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics [CHABA] (1988). Speech understanding and aging.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(3), 859–893. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 14Issue 2November 2010Pages: 30-38 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Nov 1, 2010 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2010 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2130461965 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2130461965 creator A5001150610 @default.
• W2130461965 creator A5011438855 @default.
• W2130461965 date "2010-11-01" @default.
• W2130461965 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2130461965 title "The Role of Central Auditory and Cognitive Processing Ability in Speech Perception for Elderly Listeners" @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1964072754 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1967895886 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1983533645 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1985029311 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1986910143 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1996273173 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1996833925 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W1998871200 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2015057999 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2015822510 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2022400983 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2032242202 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2038319218 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2039752037 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2041505682 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2044101630 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2048372064 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2049567682 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W205353414 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2057860164 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2063088589 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2065744446 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2077433730 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2089003081 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2091766358 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2100519767 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2101518103 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2105501400 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2120603653 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2145124268 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2168606195 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2171316976 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2268695670 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2313216464 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2334980765 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W2413084791 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W4235586400 @default.
• W2130461965 cites W4239796705 @default.
• W2130461965 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/hhd14.2.30" @default.
• W2130461965 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2130461965 type Work @default.
• W2130461965 sameAs 2130461965 @default.
• W2130461965 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2130461965 countsByYear W21304619652017 @default.
• W2130461965 countsByYear W21304619652018 @default.
• W2130461965 countsByYear W21304619652023 @default.
• W2130461965 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2130461965 hasAuthorship W2130461965A5001150610 @default.
• W2130461965 hasAuthorship W2130461965A5011438855 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C3020799230 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConcept C99209842 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C15744967 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C169760540 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C169900460 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C180747234 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C26760741 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C3020799230 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C548259974 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C71924100 @default.
• W2130461965 hasConceptScore W2130461965C99209842 @default.
• W2130461965 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2130461965 hasLocation W21304619651 @default.
• W2130461965 hasOpenAccess W2130461965 @default.
• W2130461965 hasPrimaryLocation W21304619651 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W1983273284 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W1994127467 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2046659574 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2046791759 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2120001394 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2133935771 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2139977042 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2147286541 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W2523083549 @default.
• W2130461965 hasRelatedWork W3116952392 @default.
• W2130461965 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W2130461965 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2130461965 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2130461965 magId "2130461965" @default.
• W2130461965 workType "article" @default.