Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2130487637> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2130487637 abstract "Abstract Background Dementia is a growing problem, causing substantial burden for patients, their families, and society. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in diagnosing and managing dementia; however, there are gaps between recommended and current practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ reported practice in diagnosing and managing dementia and to describe, in theoretical terms, the proposed explanations for practice that was and was not consistent with evidence-based guidelines. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs in Victoria, Australia. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) guided data collection and analysis. Interviews explored the factors hindering and enabling achievement of 13 recommended behaviours. Data were analysed using content and thematic analysis. This paper presents an in-depth description of the factors influencing two behaviours, assessing co-morbid depression using a validated tool, and conducting a formal cognitive assessment using a validated scale. Results A total of 30 GPs were interviewed. Most GPs reported that they did not assess for co-morbid depression using a validated tool as per recommended guidance. Barriers included the belief that depression can be adequately assessed using general clinical indicators and that validated tools provide little additional information (theoretical domain of ‘Beliefs about consequences’); discomfort in using validated tools (‘Emotion’), possibly due to limited training and confidence (‘Skills’; ‘Beliefs about capabilities’); limited awareness of the need for, and forgetting to conduct, a depression assessment (‘Knowledge’; ‘Memory, attention and decision processes’). Most reported practising in a manner consistent with the recommendation that a formal cognitive assessment using a validated scale be undertaken. Key factors enabling this were having an awareness of the need to conduct a cognitive assessment (‘Knowledge’); possessing the necessary skills and confidence (‘Skills’; ‘Beliefs about capabilities’); and having adequate time and resources (‘Environmental context and resources’). Conclusions This is the first study to our knowledge to use a theoretical approach to investigate the barriers and enablers to guideline-recommended diagnosis and management of dementia in general practice. It has identified key factors likely to explain GPs’ uptake of the guidelines. The results have informed the design of an intervention aimed at supporting practice change in line with dementia guidelines, which is currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised trial." @default.
- W2130487637 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5009095113 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5035523410 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5041577919 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5042892489 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5043960846 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5047360452 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5048615707 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5057779423 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5066434491 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5072012325 @default.
- W2130487637 creator A5083558361 @default.
- W2130487637 date "2014-03-03" @default.
- W2130487637 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2130487637 title "Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework" @default.
- W2130487637 cites W1556698056 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W1965904633 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W1980754242 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W1981381069 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W1994307831 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W1999480530 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2000162142 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2032148450 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2032698104 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2034995305 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2036319125 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2036559064 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2039106093 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2051404506 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2063492576 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2069780440 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2077109464 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2078324136 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2083029092 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2084025070 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2084397926 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2086599889 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2094016805 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2094924948 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2097859515 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2100144105 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2103125760 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2103377973 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2110024892 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2116567300 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2122345580 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2128121045 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2129146472 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2130563312 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2130776118 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2136578382 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2144760470 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2149450071 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2150527780 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2150768006 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2162714909 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2165070399 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2165966492 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2168190331 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2169434152 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2170793844 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2171541625 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W2395757230 @default.
- W2130487637 cites W4323254326 @default.
- W2130487637 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-31" @default.
- W2130487637 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4015883" @default.
- W2130487637 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24581339" @default.
- W2130487637 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2130487637 type Work @default.
- W2130487637 sameAs 2130487637 @default.
- W2130487637 citedByCount "71" @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372014 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372015 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372016 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372017 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372018 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372019 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372020 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372021 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372022 @default.
- W2130487637 countsByYear W21304876372023 @default.
- W2130487637 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5009095113 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5035523410 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5041577919 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5042892489 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5043960846 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5047360452 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5048615707 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5057779423 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5066434491 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5072012325 @default.
- W2130487637 hasAuthorship W2130487637A5083558361 @default.
- W2130487637 hasBestOaLocation W21304876371 @default.
- W2130487637 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2130487637 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2130487637 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
- W2130487637 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
- W2130487637 hasConcept C142724271 @default.