Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2130788085> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2130788085 endingPage "468" @default.
- W2130788085 startingPage "463" @default.
- W2130788085 abstract "Purpose: The purpose of this report is to present a systematic review of the literature to compare surgical success of lateral retinacular release (LRR) or LRR with medial soft-tissue realignment (MR) for recurrent lateral patellar instability. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for all English-language studies reporting surgical management of recurrent lateral patellar instability with LRR or with LRR and MR. Exclusion criteria included a minimum follow-up <2 years, mean age <18 years old, bony realignment procedures, surgical treatment of an initial patellar instability episode, or surgical treatment of patellofemoral pain without instability. Surgical failure was defined as an episode of patellar dislocation or subluxation during the postoperative period. Statistical analysis compared the failure rate of LRR versus combined LRR with MR by using a Fisher exact test and assessed for publication bias. Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. There were 247 knees with a minimum 2-year follow-up after LRR and 220 after LRR with MR. In the LRR patients, there were 56 cases (probability 0.227, odds 0.293) of recurrent lateral patellar instability, 26 of which were postoperative patellar dislocations. In the LRR with MR patients, there were 14 cases (probability 0.064, odds 0.068) of recurrent instability, 12 of which were dislocations. The frequency-weighted mean success with respect to instability in the LRR studies was 77.3% compared with 93.6% in the LRR with MR studies. The odds of subsequent instability after LRR were significantly greater than after LRR with MR with respect to any postoperative instability (P < .001), recurrent dislocation (P = .045), and recurrent subluxation (P < .001). Conclusions: This systematic review found that isolated LRR yields significantly inferior long-term results with respect to symptoms of recurrent lateral patellar instability compared with LRR with MR. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of level III and IV studies. Purpose: The purpose of this report is to present a systematic review of the literature to compare surgical success of lateral retinacular release (LRR) or LRR with medial soft-tissue realignment (MR) for recurrent lateral patellar instability. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for all English-language studies reporting surgical management of recurrent lateral patellar instability with LRR or with LRR and MR. Exclusion criteria included a minimum follow-up <2 years, mean age <18 years old, bony realignment procedures, surgical treatment of an initial patellar instability episode, or surgical treatment of patellofemoral pain without instability. Surgical failure was defined as an episode of patellar dislocation or subluxation during the postoperative period. Statistical analysis compared the failure rate of LRR versus combined LRR with MR by using a Fisher exact test and assessed for publication bias. Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. There were 247 knees with a minimum 2-year follow-up after LRR and 220 after LRR with MR. In the LRR patients, there were 56 cases (probability 0.227, odds 0.293) of recurrent lateral patellar instability, 26 of which were postoperative patellar dislocations. In the LRR with MR patients, there were 14 cases (probability 0.064, odds 0.068) of recurrent instability, 12 of which were dislocations. The frequency-weighted mean success with respect to instability in the LRR studies was 77.3% compared with 93.6% in the LRR with MR studies. The odds of subsequent instability after LRR were significantly greater than after LRR with MR with respect to any postoperative instability (P < .001), recurrent dislocation (P = .045), and recurrent subluxation (P < .001). Conclusions: This systematic review found that isolated LRR yields significantly inferior long-term results with respect to symptoms of recurrent lateral patellar instability compared with LRR with MR. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of level III and IV studies." @default.
- W2130788085 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2130788085 creator A5006980728 @default.
- W2130788085 creator A5007392774 @default.
- W2130788085 creator A5016850109 @default.
- W2130788085 creator A5045540294 @default.
- W2130788085 date "2007-05-01" @default.
- W2130788085 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2130788085 title "Comparison of Lateral Release Versus Lateral Release With Medial Soft-Tissue Realignment for the Treatment of Recurrent Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review" @default.
- W2130788085 cites W1263731115 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W1929134460 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W1930511998 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W1953091614 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W1964435302 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W1980943638 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2012892861 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2026416593 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2030283467 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2040032083 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2043608831 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2044869117 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2047207312 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2048398796 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2088848284 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2093128699 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2100009090 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2104707333 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2115074491 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2120186561 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2149640713 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2156126920 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2170420773 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2171567138 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2171674133 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2186936977 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W2335827470 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W286609582 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W4253089542 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W4300180615 @default.
- W2130788085 cites W4319688240 @default.
- W2130788085 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.007" @default.
- W2130788085 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17478275" @default.
- W2130788085 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2130788085 type Work @default.
- W2130788085 sameAs 2130788085 @default.
- W2130788085 citedByCount "48" @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852012 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852013 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852014 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852016 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852017 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852019 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852020 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852021 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852022 @default.
- W2130788085 countsByYear W21307880852023 @default.
- W2130788085 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2130788085 hasAuthorship W2130788085A5006980728 @default.
- W2130788085 hasAuthorship W2130788085A5007392774 @default.
- W2130788085 hasAuthorship W2130788085A5016850109 @default.
- W2130788085 hasAuthorship W2130788085A5045540294 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C207821765 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C2776824190 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C2776922776 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C2777596629 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C2780368125 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C121332964 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C126322002 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C141071460 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C142724271 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C156957248 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C204787440 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C207821765 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C2776824190 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C2776922776 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C2777596629 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C2780368125 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C57879066 @default.
- W2130788085 hasConceptScore W2130788085C71924100 @default.
- W2130788085 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2130788085 hasLocation W21307880851 @default.
- W2130788085 hasLocation W21307880852 @default.
- W2130788085 hasOpenAccess W2130788085 @default.
- W2130788085 hasPrimaryLocation W21307880851 @default.
- W2130788085 hasRelatedWork W1976994629 @default.
- W2130788085 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2130788085 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W2130788085 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2130788085 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W2130788085 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.