FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2131379095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2131379095 endingPage "628" @default.
• W2131379095 startingPage "626" @default.
• W2131379095 abstract "HomeRadiologyVol. 263, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryOpinionFalling Prey to the Sunk Cost Bias: A Potential Harm of Patient Radiation Dose HistoriesJonathan D. Eisenberg, H. Benjamin Harvey, Donald A. Moore, G. Scott Gazelle, Pari V. Pandharipande Jonathan D. Eisenberg, H. Benjamin Harvey, Donald A. Moore, G. Scott Gazelle, Pari V. Pandharipande Author AffiliationsFrom the Institute for Technology Assessment (J.D.E., G.S.G., P.V.P.) and Department of Radiology (J.D.E., H.B.H., G.S.G., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (H.B.H., G.S.G., P.V.P.); and Haas School of Business, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (D.A.M.).Address correspondence to P.V.P. (e-mail: [email protected]).Jonathan D. EisenbergH. Benjamin HarveyDonald A. MooreG. Scott GazellePari V. Pandharipande Published Online:Jun 1 2012https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112459MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In AbstractAlthough patient dose histories will make valuable contributions to quality improvement and research initiatives, care must be taken to avoid misuse by physicians when making imaging decisions for individual patients.References1 Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KPet al.. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(22):2071–2077. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Bogdanich W. After stroke scans, patients face serious health risks. New York Times Web site. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/health/01radiation.html. Published July 30, 2010. Accessed August 13, 2011. Google Scholar3 Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJet al.. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 2011;258(3):889–905. Link, Google Scholar4 Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus Ret al.. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(22):2078–2086. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Amis ES, Butler PFAmerican College of Radiology. ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: three years later. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(11):865–870. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Safety investigation of CT brain perfusion scans. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm185898.htm. Updated November 9, 2010. Accessed November 14, 2010. Google Scholar7 Goske MJ. Getting it right: are regulation and registries for CT radiation dose in children the answer? Pediatr Radiol 2011;41(Suppl 2):567–570. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 American College of Radiology. National Radiology Data Registry. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/NRDR.asp. Accessed November 14, 2011. Google Scholar9 Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts CCet al.. An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. J Digit Imaging 2011;24(2):223–233. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Cook TS, Zimmerman SL, Steingall SR, Maidment AD, Kim W, Boonn WW. RADIANCE: an automated, enterprise-wide solution for archiving and reporting CT radiation dose estimates. RadioGraphics 2011;31(7):1833–1846. Link, Google Scholar11 Durand DJ. A rational approach to the clinical use of cumulative effective dose estimates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(1):160–162. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 The Joint Commission. Radiation risks of diagnostic imaging. The Joint Commission Sentinel Alert Event I, August 24, 2011. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_471.PDF. Accessed September 9, 2011. Google Scholar13 Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2006. Google Scholar14 Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1985;35(1):124–140. Crossref, Google Scholar15 Zeelenberg M, van Dijk E. A reverse sunk cost effect in risky decision making: sometimes we have too much invested to gamble. J Econ Psychol 1997;18(6):677–691. Crossref, Google Scholar16 Staw BM. Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1976;16(1):27–44. Crossref, Google Scholar17 Sample dose limit threshold notification. Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield West Virgnia Web site. https://www.highmarkbcbswv.com/PDFFiles/nia/dose-limit-sample.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2011. Google Scholar18 Radiation safety awareness initiative. Tufts Health Plan Web site. http://www.tuftshealthplan.com/providers/provider.php?sec=newsampcontent=radiation_safety. Accessed November 2, 2011. Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived November 16, 2011; revision requested December 22; revision received January 26, 2012; final version accepted February 2.Published online: June 2012Published in print: June 2012 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited BySunk‐Cost Bias and Knowing When to Terminate a Research ProjectElainePerignat, Fraser F.Fleming2022 | Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 134, No. 36Sunk‐Cost Bias and Knowing When to Terminate a Research ProjectElainePerignat, Fraser F.Fleming2022 | Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 61, No. 36Accounting for radiation exposure from previous CT exams while deciding on the next exam: What do referring clinicians think?Madan M.Rehani, KimberlyApplegate, TamásBodzay, ChiHeon Kim, Donald L.Miller, MoulayAli Nassiri, JinChul Paeng, SuphotSrimahachota, SumanSrinivasa, MamoruTakenaka, SeraTerez, JeniaVassileva, WeihaiZhuo2022 | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 155Are Continued Efforts to Reduce Radiation Exposures from X-Rays Warranted?Paul A.Oakley, Deed E.Harrison2021 | Dose-Response, Vol. 19, No. 1Radiation risk issues in recurrent imagingCharlesBrower, Madan MRehani2021 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 94, No. 1126The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imagingDonaldFrush2021 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 94, No. 1126Translating evidence into practice: a longitudinal qualitative exploration of allied health decision-makingJenniferWhite, KellieGrant, MitchellSarkies, TerrenceHaines, Meg E.Morris, LeeanneCarey, Nicholas F.Taylor, Anne E.Holland, AnneBardoel, CylieWilliams, LisaO’Brien, Elizabeth H.Skinner, JennyMartin2021 | Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1Patient cumulative radiation exposure—the potential for unintended consequencesColinWalsh, GeraldineO’Reilly, DaraMurphy2020 | European Radiology, Vol. 30, No. 8Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical SectorPaul A.Oakley, Deed E.Harrison2020 | Dose-Response, Vol. 18, No. 2Arbitrary Radiation Dose “Limits” Must Not Set Standard of CareRebecca M.Marsh2018 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 3Financial Forecasting and Stochastic Modeling: Predicting the Impact of Business DecisionsGeoffrey D. Rubin, Bhavik N. Patel, 18 April 2017 | Radiology, Vol. 283, No. 2Organ dose variability and trends in tomosynthesis and radiographyJocelynHoye, YakunZhang, GreeshmaAgasthya, GregSturgeon, AnujKapadia, W. PaulSegars, EhsanSamei2017 | Journal of Medical Imaging, Vol. 4, No. 3Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory MedicineMichael B.Gotway, Prasad M.Panse, James F.Gruden, Brett M.Elicker2016Applying Heuristics and Biases More Broadly and CautiouslyAbraham P.Schwab2016 | The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 16, No. 5Canadian Association of Radiologists Radiation Protection Working Group: Automated Patient-Specific Dose Registries—What Are They and What Are They Good for?Thorarin A.Bjarnason, YogeshThakur, SantanuChakraborty, PeterLiu, Martin E.O'Malley, RichardCoulden, MichelleNoga, AndrewMason, JohnMayo2015 | Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, Vol. 66, No. 3Organizational Behavior: A PrimerBhavik N.Patel2015 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 12, No. 8Answers to Common Questions About the Use and Safety of CT ScansCynthia H.McCollough, Jerrold T.Bushberg, Joel G.Fletcher, Laurence J.Eckel2015 | Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 90, No. 10Communicating Potential Radiation-Induced Cancer Risks From Medical Imaging Directly to PatientsDiana L.Lam, David B.Larson, Jonathan D.Eisenberg, Howard P.Forman, Christoph I.Lee2015 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 205, No. 5Radiation Biology of Medical Imaging2014From ‘Image Gently’ to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation riskR. PaulGuillerman2014 | Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 44, No. S3The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicineSjirk J.Westra2014 | Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 44, No. S3Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully usedCristianCandela-Juan, AlegríaMontoro, EnriqueRuiz-Martínez, Juan IgnacioVillaescusa, LuisMartí-Bonmatí2014 | European Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 3Patient-Centered ImagingAndrew J.Einstein, Daniel S.Berman, James K.Min, Robert C.Hendel, Thomas C.Gerber, J. JeffreyCarr, Manuel D.Cerqueira, S. JamesCullom, RobertDeKemp, Neal W.Dickert, SharmilaDorbala, RezaFazel, Ernest V.Garcia, Raymond J.Gibbons, Sandra S.Halliburton, JörgHausleiter, Gary V.Heller, ScottJerome, John R.Lesser, Gilbert L.Raff, PeterTilkemeier, Kim A.Williams, Leslee J.Shaw2014 | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 63, No. 15The Cumulative Risk of Multiple CT Exposures Using Two Different MethodsHildebrandDijkstra, Jaap M.Groen, Fons A.H.H.Bongaerts, Eric J.van der Jagt, Truuske G.H.de Bock, Marcel J.W.Greuter2014 | Health Physics, Vol. 106, No. 4Imaging in the Evaluation of the Young Patient With Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseSudha A.Anupindi, Andrew B.Grossman, KatherineNimkin, PetarMamula, Michael S.Gee2014 | Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Vol. 59, No. 4Don't let radiation scare trump patient care: 10 ways you can harm your patients by fear of radiation-induced cancer from diagnostic imagingAlan SBrody, R PaulGuillerman2014 | Thorax, Vol. 69, No. 8Approaches to Enhancing Radiation Safety in Cardiovascular ImagingRezaFazel, Thomas C.Gerber, StephenBalter, David J.Brenner, J. JeffreyCarr, Manuel D.Cerqueira, JerseyChen, Andrew J.Einstein, Harlan M.Krumholz, MahadevappaMahesh, Cynthia H.McCollough, James K.Min, Richard L.Morin, Brahmajee K.Nallamothu, KhurramNasir, Rita F.Redberg, Leslee J.Shaw2014 | Circulation, Vol. 130, No. 19The Fisherman's Cards: How to Address Past and Future Radiation Exposures in Clinical Decision MakingJonathan D.Eisenberg, Sarah O.Lewin, Pari V.Pandharipande2014 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 202, No. 2Prioritizing Examination-Centered Over Patient-Centered Dose Reduction: A Hazard of Institutional “Benchmarking”Jonathan D.Eisenberg, Michael E.Gilmore, Mannudeep K.Kalra, Chung YinKong, Pari V.Pandharipande2014 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 202, No. 5Patients with Testicular Cancer Undergoing CT Surveillance Demonstrate a Pitfall of Radiation-induced Cancer Risk Estimates: The Timing ParadoxPari V. Pandharipande, , Jonathan D. Eisenberg, , Richard J. Lee, , Michael E. Gilmore, , Ekin A. Turan, , Sarabjeet Singh, , Mannudeep K. Kalra, , Bob Liu, , Chung Yin Kong, , and G. Scott Gazelle, 1 March 2013 | Radiology, Vol. 266, No. 3Exposure tracking for x-ray imaging is a bad ideaJames M.Kofler, David W.Jordan, Colin G.Orton2013 | Medical Physics, Vol. 41, No. 1JOURNAL CLUB: How Radiation Exposure Histories Influence Physician Imaging Decisions: A Multicenter Radiologist Survey StudyPari V.Pandharipande, Jonathan D.Eisenberg, Laura L.Avery, Martin L.Gunn, Stella K.Kang, Alec J.Megibow, Ekin A.Turan, H. BenjaminHarvey, Chung YinKong, Emily C.Dowling, Elkan F.Halpern, KarenDonelan, G. ScottGazelle2013 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 200, No. 6Recommended Articles Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Imaging versus CT for Acute AppendicitisRadiology2018Volume: 288Issue: 2pp. 467-475Customer Service in Radiology: Satisfying Your Patients and ReferrersRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 6pp. 1872-1887Can Patient Triaging with Clinical Scoring Systems Reduce CT Use in Adolescents and Young Adults Suspected of Having Appendicitis?Radiology2021Volume: 300Issue: 2pp. 350-358Contemporary Risk Management for RadiologistsRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 6pp. 1717-1728Photon-counting CT: Scouting for Quantitative Imaging BiomarkersRadiology2020Volume: 298Issue: 1pp. 153-154See More RSNA Education Exhibits To Be or Not to Be: Appendicitis, as Diagnosed by Deep Learning Algorithms, Radiologists, and ResidentsDigital Posters2020Patient Dose Calculation and Counseling using Open Source Mobile AppDigital Posters2019Gaining the Upper Hand on Upper Abdominal Imaging: Using Ultrasound to Assess the Gastrointestinal Tract for Causes of Abdominal PainDigital Posters2019 RSNA Case Collection Acute appendicitisRSNA Case Collection2020Follicular Lymphoma on Ga68-Dotatate PET-CTRSNA Case Collection2020Appendicitis in PregnancyRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 263, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W2131379095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2131379095 creator A5003218663 @default.
• W2131379095 creator A5009216690 @default.
• W2131379095 creator A5026257022 @default.
• W2131379095 creator A5047362302 @default.
• W2131379095 creator A5053103460 @default.
• W2131379095 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W2131379095 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2131379095 title "Falling Prey to the Sunk Cost Bias: A Potential Harm of Patient Radiation Dose Histories" @default.
• W2131379095 cites W1965882323 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W1993774686 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2006397401 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2041899612 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2103990597 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2122546849 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2130173750 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2147974276 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2150018134 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2160200402 @default.
• W2131379095 cites W2170260757 @default.
• W2131379095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112459" @default.
• W2131379095 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3359514" @default.
• W2131379095 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22623688" @default.
• W2131379095 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2131379095 type Work @default.
• W2131379095 sameAs 2131379095 @default.
• W2131379095 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952013 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952014 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952015 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952016 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952017 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952018 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952020 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952021 @default.
• W2131379095 countsByYear W21313790952022 @default.
• W2131379095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2131379095 hasAuthorship W2131379095A5003218663 @default.
• W2131379095 hasAuthorship W2131379095A5009216690 @default.
• W2131379095 hasAuthorship W2131379095A5026257022 @default.
• W2131379095 hasAuthorship W2131379095A5047362302 @default.
• W2131379095 hasAuthorship W2131379095A5053103460 @default.
• W2131379095 hasBestOaLocation W21313790952 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C2779079380 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C79179835 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C15744967 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C162324750 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C175444787 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C188382862 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C18903297 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C2777363581 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C2779079380 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C71924100 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C77805123 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C79179835 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C86803240 @default.
• W2131379095 hasConceptScore W2131379095C99454951 @default.
• W2131379095 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2131379095 hasLocation W21313790951 @default.
• W2131379095 hasLocation W21313790952 @default.
• W2131379095 hasLocation W21313790953 @default.
• W2131379095 hasLocation W21313790954 @default.
• W2131379095 hasOpenAccess W2131379095 @default.
• W2131379095 hasPrimaryLocation W21313790951 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W1989160412 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2023784581 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2119643078 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2131379095 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2398856401 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W2977541931 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W3208456874 @default.
• W2131379095 hasRelatedWork W4313425013 @default.
• W2131379095 hasVolume "263" @default.
• W2131379095 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2131379095 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2131379095 magId "2131379095" @default.
• W2131379095 workType "article" @default.