Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2132666977> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2132666977 abstract "In an empirical study of professional fees and expenses in 74 large public company bankruptcies concluded 1998-2003, we found that (1) controlling for the trend over time and the geographical location of the cases, company size (measured by assets), case duration (measured in days), and the number parties (measured by the numbers of professional firms working) explain nearly 87% of the case-to-case variation in professional fees, (2) fees and expenses increased about 9% per year over the six year period covered by our study, (3) five of six predictors of fees and expenses exhibited a strong scale effect, (4) the scale effect for company size is so severe that reporting fees as a simple percentage of assets is misleading, (5) using the same model we used with court file data our variables explain 86% of the case-to-case variance in the amounts of professional fees and expenses reported in SEC filing data, and (6) fees and expenses reported in SEC filing data are highly correlated with those reported in court file data, but are 59% higher. The principal determinants of fees and expenses assets, days in bankruptcy, and the number of professional firms working appear to us to measure not only the need for professional services, but also the opportunity for professionals to bill. In an attempt to statistically isolate this billing opportunity component of fees and expenses, we compiled a second set of variables employees, docket length, and reorganization plan classes that we believe measures case complexity without measuring billing opportunity. When those variables are substituted for the principal determinants, the regression explains substantially the same percentage of variance in fees and expenses. This second, complexity-only model predicts fees that, controlling for scale, are significantly lower for companies with assets greater than about $1 billion. We theorize that this systematic difference in the two models' predictions measures the billing opportunity component of fees and expenses in large public company bankruptcies." @default.
- W2132666977 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2132666977 creator A5056065167 @default.
- W2132666977 creator A5072392436 @default.
- W2132666977 date "2006-06-05" @default.
- W2132666977 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
- W2132666977 title "Professional Overcharging in Large Bankruptcy Reorganization Cases" @default.
- W2132666977 cites W1500688562 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W1562628026 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2000441842 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2029751545 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2038505981 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2045704255 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2096159376 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2112675628 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2208314819 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W2760493217 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W3122457827 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W3122555906 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W3122643395 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W3123921128 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W3125280412 @default.
- W2132666977 cites W3126130542 @default.
- W2132666977 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2132666977 type Work @default.
- W2132666977 sameAs 2132666977 @default.
- W2132666977 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2132666977 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2132666977 hasAuthorship W2132666977A5056065167 @default.
- W2132666977 hasAuthorship W2132666977A5072392436 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C196083921 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C504631918 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C10138342 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C121332964 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C121955636 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C144133560 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C162118730 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C196083921 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C2778755073 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C504631918 @default.
- W2132666977 hasConceptScore W2132666977C62520636 @default.
- W2132666977 hasLocation W21326669771 @default.
- W2132666977 hasOpenAccess W2132666977 @default.
- W2132666977 hasPrimaryLocation W21326669771 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W139672035 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W1536061408 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W1550540546 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W159206264 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2003198142 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2007530817 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W201489037 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2026714461 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2096937883 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2167575618 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2194432018 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2271162310 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2336328887 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2795642258 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W302505715 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W3026217786 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W3120077618 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W3123780202 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W210379373 @default.
- W2132666977 hasRelatedWork W2599952529 @default.
- W2132666977 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2132666977 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2132666977 magId "2132666977" @default.
- W2132666977 workType "article" @default.