Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2134040438> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2134040438 endingPage "44017" @default.
- W2134040438 startingPage "44012" @default.
- W2134040438 abstract "Angiotensin II is a peptide hormone regulator of blood pressure and fluid balance in mammals. Evidence obtained largely in vitro has also suggested that angiotensin II has growth-promoting effects and that it might thereby contribute to such pathological phenomena as cardiac hypertrophy, a major risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. It has been difficult to test for the direct growth-promoting effects of angiotensin II in vivo, however, because of the generalized effects of the peptide on hemodynamics. To overcome this limitation and to test for cardiac-specific functions of angiotensin II, we generated transgenic mice expressing an angiotensin II-producing fusion protein exclusively in cardiac myocytes. Our findings are the first to distinguish between local and systemic effects of angiotensin II on the heart and introduce a novel technique for studying tissue-specific peptide function. Angiotensin II is a peptide hormone regulator of blood pressure and fluid balance in mammals. Evidence obtained largely in vitro has also suggested that angiotensin II has growth-promoting effects and that it might thereby contribute to such pathological phenomena as cardiac hypertrophy, a major risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. It has been difficult to test for the direct growth-promoting effects of angiotensin II in vivo, however, because of the generalized effects of the peptide on hemodynamics. To overcome this limitation and to test for cardiac-specific functions of angiotensin II, we generated transgenic mice expressing an angiotensin II-producing fusion protein exclusively in cardiac myocytes. Our findings are the first to distinguish between local and systemic effects of angiotensin II on the heart and introduce a novel technique for studying tissue-specific peptide function. renin-angiotensin system angiotensin II frog skin Ang II high performance liquid chromatography transgenic The circulating renin-angiotensin system (RAS)1 is a key regulator of blood pressure and volume homeostasis in mammals, and its peptide product, angiotensin II (Ang II), has been implicated in many of the harmful sequelae of high blood pressure, including cardiac and vascular hypertrophy and renal injury. In recent years, it has been suggested that Ang II could also have direct effects on the heart, including facilitating sympathetic nerve transmission, increasing cardiac contractility, and initiating structural remodeling resulting in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis (1Weber K.T. Brilla C.G. Circulation. 1991; 83: 1849-1865Crossref PubMed Scopus (1892) Google Scholar, 2Lee M.A. Bohm M. Paul M. Ganten D. Circulation. 1993; 87: IV7-IV13PubMed Google Scholar, 3Dzau V.J. J. Hypertens. 1994; 12 (suppl.): S3-S10Google Scholar, 4Dostal D.E. Baker K.M. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 643-650Crossref PubMed Scopus (302) Google Scholar). Although inhibition of the cardiac RAS in these pathologies has shown some therapeutic benefit (5Linz W. Scholkens B.A. Ganten D. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. [A]. 1989; 11: 1325-1350Crossref PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar, 6Baker K.M. Chernin M.I. Wixson S.K. Aceto J.F. Am. J. Physiol. 1990; 259: H324-H332PubMed Google Scholar, 7Bruckschlegel G. Holmer S.R. Jandeleit K. Grimm D. Muders F. Kromer E.P. Riegger G.A. Schunkert H. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 250-259Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 8Kim S. Ohta K. Hamaguchi A. Yukimura T. Miura K. Iwao H. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1252-1259Crossref PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar), it has been impossible to determine whether this benefit is secondary to reducing cardiac workload or whether it is due to inhibition of the local actions of Ang II on cardiac cells. These questions are the subject of much current debate because of their importance in determining treatment targets in patients with increased risk for cardiac disease (9Dzau V.J. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1047-1052Crossref PubMed Scopus (686) Google Scholar). Animal models resulting from localized overexpression of RAS components (10Hein L. Stevens M.E. Barsh G.S. Pratt R.E. Kobilka B.K. Dzau V.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 6391-6396Crossref PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar, 11Mazzolai L. Nussberger J. Aubert J.F. Brunner D.B. Gabbiani G. Brunner H.R. Pedrazzini T. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 1324-1330Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar, 12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar, 13Prescott G. Silversides D.W. Chiu L.S.M. Reudelhuber T.L. Physiol. Genomics. 2000; 4: 67-73Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) have not resolved this issue either because overexpression of the enzymes involved in Ang II synthesis does not automatically result in increased cardiac Ang II formation or because Ang II production is not limited to the heart. At present, no animal model has been reported with localized genetic inactivation of RAS components. To test for tissue-specific functions of Ang II in vivo, we developed a fusion protein that can direct the release of Ang II peptide within specific target tissues of transgenic animals (14Methot D. LaPointe M.C. Touyz R.M. Yang X.P. Carretero O.A. Deschepper C.F. Schiffrin E.L. Thibault G. Reudelhuber T.L. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 12994-12999Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar, 15Methot D. van Kats J.P. Lochard N. Tremblay F. Silversides D.W. Reudelhuber T.L. Am. J. Hypertens. 2001; 14: 38.S-43SCrossref Google Scholar). Here we report on the targeted expression of this fusion protein specifically in the mouse heart, where it leads to high local production and secretion of Ang II by cardiomyocytes. Our approach is the first demonstration of in vivo genetic targeting of biological active peptides to a specific organ and allows for the first time discrimination between the local (direct) and systemic (indirect) effects of Ang II on the heart. The vectors encoding the Ang II-releasing fusion protein and the frog skin Ang II-releasing fusion protein (fsAng II), a peptide structurally related to Ang II (16Khosla M.C. Bumpus F.M. Yasuhara T. Nakajima T. J. Med. Chem. 1981; 24: 885-887Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar), have been described previously (14Methot D. LaPointe M.C. Touyz R.M. Yang X.P. Carretero O.A. Deschepper C.F. Schiffrin E.L. Thibault G. Reudelhuber T.L. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 12994-12999Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar, 15Methot D. van Kats J.P. Lochard N. Tremblay F. Silversides D.W. Reudelhuber T.L. Am. J. Hypertens. 2001; 14: 38.S-43SCrossref Google Scholar). Expression of the fusion protein in the mouse heart was driven by a 6-kB fragment of the mouse alpha myosin heavy chain gene promoter (a generous gift from Jeffrey Robbins, University of Cincinnati) cloned upstream of the fusion protein cDNA. FVB/N mouse embryos were manipulated according to standard protocols for pronuclear microinjection (17Hogan B. Beddington R. Constantini F. Lacy E. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY1994Google Scholar), and all subsequent breeding was carried out in the FVB/N line. A plasmid containing the tyrosinase gene was co-injected with the fusion protein construct to allow easy identification of TG mice by coat color (18Methot D. Reudelhuber T.L. Silversides D.W. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 4551-4556Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar). Male transgenic mice were tested with their non-transgenic littermates at 5–6 weeks or 10–12 weeks of age. Animals were handled in accordance with institutional guidelines. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate of conscious mice were measured by tail cuff plesmythography using the Visitech Systems BP-2000 (Apex, NC) (19Krege J.H. Hodgin J.B. Hagaman J.R. Smithies O. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1111-1115Crossref PubMed Scopus (486) Google Scholar). Cardiac hypertrophy was quantitated by measurement of ventricular weight and by calculating the heart weight-to-body weight ratio and heart weight-to-tibia length ratio. For measurement of angiotensin peptide in plasma and heart, blood was collected via cardiac puncture of anesthetized mice (2.5 mg of ketamine and 0.06 mg of acepromazine) in the presence of inhibitor solution (13Prescott G. Silversides D.W. Chiu L.S.M. Reudelhuber T.L. Physiol. Genomics. 2000; 4: 67-73Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Plasma was separated at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C. Hearts were taken out, blotted on paper, and freed from atria. Ventricles were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Angiotensin peptides were extracted from plasma and tissue (13Prescott G. Silversides D.W. Chiu L.S.M. Reudelhuber T.L. Physiol. Genomics. 2000; 4: 67-73Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 20van Kats J.P. Danser A.H.J. van Meegen J.R. Sassen L.M.A. Verdouw P.D. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Circulation. 1998; 98: 73-81Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar) and assayed for Ang II or fsAng II by radioimmunoassay (21Deschepper C.F. Crumrine D.A. Ganong W.F. Endocrinology. 1986; 119: 36-43Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar). The antiserum displayed 75–85% cross-reactivity with fsAng II and 100% with the Ang II metabolites Ang III and Ang IV (Ang-(2–8) and Ang-(3–8), respectively). Active plasma renin concentration was determined in plasma using an enzyme kinetic assay for Ang I generation in the presence of excess sheep renin substrate (20van Kats J.P. Danser A.H.J. van Meegen J.R. Sassen L.M.A. Verdouw P.D. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Circulation. 1998; 98: 73-81Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). To measure angiotensin receptor densities (22Fareh J. Touyz R.M. Schiffrin E.L. Thibault G. Circ. Res. 1996; 78: 302-311Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar), crude cardiac plasma membranes were prepared from wild type (n = 4) and Ang II-producing mice (1B, n = 4). Competitive binding assays were performed by using increasing concentrations (10−12-10−6m) of [Sar1, Ile8]Ang II and 40–50 pm125I-[Sar1, Ile8]Ang II (2200 Ci/mmol). Binding data were analyzed with EBDA-Ligand software (Biosoft, Milltown, NJ). Extracts from plasma or cardiac tissue were injected with a tracer amount of 125I-Ang II on a reversed-phase HPLC system using a μBondapak C18 steel column of 150 × 3.9 mm with a 10-μm particle size (Waters, Milford, MA). Angiotensin peptides were separated according to a modification of a protocol described previously (20van Kats J.P. Danser A.H.J. van Meegen J.R. Sassen L.M.A. Verdouw P.D. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Circulation. 1998; 98: 73-81Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). As a reference for retention times for fsAng II, Ang II, and its metabolites Ang III and IV (all from Bachem, Torrance, CA), 200–300 pg of each peptide was injected separately with a tracer amount of 125I-Ang II. Fractions were neutralized with 50 μl of 0.17 m NaOH and lyophilized before radioimmunoassay. Perfusion of isolated mouse hearts was performed to test for the cardiac release of Ang II by transgenic mice (1B and 2A; n = 4) and control (n= 5). Mice were heparinized and anesthetized (methoxyflurane), and then the heart was removed and placed in ice-cold Tyrode's buffer (23de Lannoy L.M. Danser A.H.J. van Kats J.P. Schoemaker R.G. Saxena P.R. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 1240-1251Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar). The aorta was cannulated for retrograde perfusion in a Langendorff setup. Hearts were perfused at a constant flow of 2 ml/min with oxygenated Tyrode's buffer. Coronary effluent was collected for 25 min in a tube on ice following a 10-min stabilization period. Perfusate was concentrated on Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA), and eluate was assayed for angiotensin content after lyophilization. Hearts were collected for histology after in situ fixation in Bouin's fixative and embedded in paraffin. Serial cuts of 5 μm were prepared and stained with Sirius Red to evaluate collagen content (13Prescott G. Silversides D.W. Chiu L.S.M. Reudelhuber T.L. Physiol. Genomics. 2000; 4: 67-73Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Fibrosis was quantitated by recording 10 randomly chosen fields without arteries (magnification ×400) from the left ventricular free wall of three non-consecutive transversal sections per heart. Sirius Red staining on sections from Ang II-producing (1B, n = 6) and control (n = 4) mice was analyzed using a digital imaging system (Empix Imaging, Mississauga, Canada). Osmotic minipumps (Alza Corp., Palo Alto, CA) were implanted subcutaneously in anesthetized (2.5 mg of ketamine and 0.06 mg of acepromazine) transgenic (1B, n= 9) and control (n = 9) mice, aged 12 weeks, for the administration of Ang II (350 ng/kg/min) or saline. Blood pressure was measured for 2 weeks, after which mice were sacrificed and hearts were collected for histology and assessment of heart weight. All values are expressed as mean ± S.E. Statistical analysis of tissue angiotensin levels was performed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnet’s post-hoc t test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. We generated mice in which the cardiomyocytes chronically release Ang II by making them transgenic for an Ang II-releasing fusion protein under the control of the alpha myosin heavy chain promoter. The essential features of this fusion protein (15Methot D. van Kats J.P. Lochard N. Tremblay F. Silversides D.W. Reudelhuber T.L. Am. J. Hypertens. 2001; 14: 38.S-43SCrossref Google Scholar) are as follows. To ensure cell secretion of the protein, a signal peptide from human prorenin is linked to a portion of the mouse heavy chain constant region of IgG2B, which mainly provides mass to the protein (Fig.1 a). The Ig fragment is linked to the peptide of interest by a molecular spacer, a portion of the human prorenin prosegment, containing a cleavage site at its carboxyl terminus for the protease furin. After cleavage, the encoded peptide is released in the secretory pathway and secreted by the cell. The same approach was followed for localized delivery of fsAng II. This peptide, which is structurally related to Ang II (Fig. 1 b), has similar pressor and receptor binding properties to native Ang II (14Methot D. LaPointe M.C. Touyz R.M. Yang X.P. Carretero O.A. Deschepper C.F. Schiffrin E.L. Thibault G. Reudelhuber T.L. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 12994-12999Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar,16Khosla M.C. Bumpus F.M. Yasuhara T. Nakajima T. J. Med. Chem. 1981; 24: 885-887Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar). The advantage of fsAng II over Ang II is that the proline in the amino-terminal extension of fsAng II can act as a block to degradation of the peptide by aminopeptidases (24Mentlein R. FEBS Lett. 1988; 234: 251-256Crossref PubMed Scopus (192) Google Scholar). We established three independent transgenic lines producing the Ang II-releasing fusion protein (designated 1A, 1B, and 1C) and five lines producing the fsAng II-releasing fusion protein (2A, 2B, 2C, 2DA, and 2DB). In all lines, the transgene was transmitted in a Mendelian fashion (data not shown). Here we present the data obtained with three of these lines of mice (1B, 2A, and 2C), the results of which were reproduced in the other lines (data not shown). Expression of the fusion protein in line 2A led to the highest cardiac levels of angiotensin peptide (roughly 6000 times the levels in control mice), whereas we found intermediate and moderately elevated angiotensin peptide levels in lines 2C and 1B, respectively (Table I).Table ICharacterization of transgenic and control mice at 5–6 and 10–12 weeks of ageControl1B (Ang II)2A (fsAng II)2C (fsAng II)Age 5–6 weeksn = 15n = 6n = 9n = 8 BW (g)21.6 ± 0.521.1 ± 0.822.0 ± 2.221.2 ± 0.5 HW (mg)91 ± 186 ± 3155 ± 41-aP < 0.01.95 ± 3 HW/BW (mg/g)4.2 ± 0.14.1 ± 0.17.1 ± 0.51-aP < 0.01.4.5 ± 0.1 Tibia length (mm)16.1 ± 0.116.4 ± 0.215.8 ± 0.316.1 ± 0.1 HW/TL (mg/mm)5.6 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.19.8 ± 0.11-aP < 0.01.5.9 ± 0.2 Systolic pressure (mm Hg)135 ± 4144 ± 3169 ± 51-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.141 ± 2 Heart rate (bpm)637 ± 13677 ± 11620 ± 11653 ± 23 Plasma (fs)Ang II (pg/ml)126 ± 25290 ± 97443 ± 1031-aP < 0.01.72 ± 8 Cardiac (fs)Ang II (ng/g)0.23 ± 0.0412.4 ± 1.61-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.1384 ± 1231-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.219 ± 151-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control. Renin (ng Ang I/ml/h)1167 ± 136752 ± 2589.3 ± 421-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.157 ± 231-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.Age 10–12 weeksn = 18n = 11n = 8n = 13 BW (g)24.8 ± 0.423.2 ± 0.626.4 ± 0.727.2 ± 0.9 HW (mg)98 ± 292 ± 3153 ± 51-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.121 ± 61-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control. HW/BW (mg/g)4.0 ± 0.14.0 ± 0.15.3 ± 0.11-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.4.2 ± 0.11-cP < 0.05. Tibia length (mm)17.4 ± 0.116.8 ± 0.317.8 ± 0.217.9 ± 0.2 HW/TL (mg/mm)5.8 ± 0.15.6 ± 0.18.7 ± 0.31-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.6.7 ± 0.31-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control. Systolic pressure (mm Hg)131 ± 3137 ± 6163 ± 61-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.154 ± 41-aP < 0.01. Heart rate (bpm)681 ± 18619 ± 18677 ± 12737 ± 16 Plasma (fs)Ang II (pg/ml)127 ± 1477 ± 8340 ± 211-aP < 0.01.131 ± 31 Cardiac (fs)Ang II (ng/g)0.19 ± 0.065.7 ± 0.71-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.1123 ± 441-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.225 ± 421-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control. Renin (ng Ang I/ml/h)1646 ± 1941526 ± 24483 ± 241-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.457 ± 1371-bP < 0.001 transgenic versus control.Data are collected from non-transgenic mice (control) and transgenic Ang II-producing (1B) or fsAng II-producing (2A,2C) mice. HW/BW, heart weight-to-body weight ratio; HW/TL, heart weight-to-tibia length ratio; bpm, beats per minute.1-a P < 0.01.1-b P < 0.001 transgenic versus control.1-c P < 0.05. Open table in a new tab Data are collected from non-transgenic mice (control) and transgenic Ang II-producing (1B) or fsAng II-producing (2A,2C) mice. HW/BW, heart weight-to-body weight ratio; HW/TL, heart weight-to-tibia length ratio; bpm, beats per minute. Because angiotensins have been shown to be rapidly degraded in the interstitial space (25Schuijt M.P. van Kats J.P. de Zeeuw S. Duncker D.J. Verdouw P.D. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Danser A.H.J. J. Hypertens. 1999; 17: 1885-1891Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar), we wanted to ascertain that the Ang II we measured in the heart was intact Ang II peptide and not its metabolites. Therefore, we analyzed cardiac extracts from line 1B by HPLC. Following radioimmunoassay of the HPLC fractions, we found a single peak corresponding to Ang II but not its metabolites (Fig.2, a and b). Because recovery in our HPLC-separated fractions was >80%, our results suggest that immunoreactive angiotensin in transgenic hearts from the line with the lowest expression corresponds to intact Ang II and not its metabolites. The release of angiotensin peptide from the heart into the circulation was evident in the line with the highest expression of cardiac fsAng II (2A; Table I). Further proof for spillage of Ang II from the heart in the two lines expressing fsAng II comes from the measurements of active plasma renin concentration. Elevated Ang II levels in the circulation suppress (via a negative feedback on renal juxtaglomerular cells) the formation and secretion of renin from these cells. Renin activity was suppressed in lines 2A and 2C, whereas in line 1B it was not affected (Table I). Indeed, HPLC analysis of plasma from line 2A displayed a single Ang II immunoreactive peak, which approximates the retention time of fsAng II and not Ang II (Fig. 2 c). The small difference between the retention times of the fsAng II standard and the peptide derived from plasma extract suggests that the angiotensinase-resistant des-[Ala1]-fsAng II is the main form of the fsAng II peptide in the circulation. This result also demonstrates that endogenous Ang II production was largely suppressed in line 2A and that virtually all of the circulating Ang II (fsAng II) was derived from the hearts of these animals. Although we did not find any evidence for Ang II leakage into the plasma from the hearts of 1B mice, mounting the hearts in a Langendorff preparation showed that coronary perfusate collected during 25 min from hearts obtained from transgenic mice (1B and 2A) contained 30–120 pg of Ang II and 400–2700 pg of fsAng II, respectively. Perfusate collected from the hearts of non-transgenic mice did not contain any detectable Ang II immunoreactivity, which is in agreement with a previous study using isolated perfused hearts of normal rats (23de Lannoy L.M. Danser A.H.J. van Kats J.P. Schoemaker R.G. Saxena P.R. Schalekamp M.A.D.H. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 1240-1251Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar). These results confirm that even though expression of our Ang II-releasing fusion protein in cardiomyocytes does not result in detectable increases in plasma levels of Ang II, the cardiac cells do release the peptide in vivo. To assess and compare the physiological effects of elevated cardiac (all lines) and combined cardiac and circulating (2A and 2C) Ang II levels, we measured systolic blood pressure and quantitated cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic mice and control littermates. The abundant overflow of fsAng II from the heart into the circulation led to the elevation of blood pressure in transgenic mice from line 2A at 5–6 and 10–12 weeks and in transgenic mice from line 2C at 10–12 weeks (Table I). We did not observe any alteration of systolic blood pressure in mice from line 1B as compared with control mice, and no differences were seen in heart rates between transgenic and non-transgenic mice. Increase of systolic blood pressure in line 2A at 5–6 and 10–12 weeks of age was accompanied by cardiac hypertrophy as indicated by an increase of heart weight-to-body weight ratio and heart weight-to-tibia length ratio (Table I). These hypertrophic indices were only elevated in mice of line 2C at 10–12 weeks of age, when they had developed full hypertension. We found no evidence of cardiac hypertrophy in mice from line 1B despite dramatically increased cardiac Ang II content. Systolic blood pressure in transgenic mice correlated with the degree of cardiac hypertrophy as determined by heart weight-to-body weight ratio (Fig.3) at 5–6 weeks (R 2 = 0.53, p < 0.001) and at 10–12 weeks (R 2 = 0.32, p < 0.01). We also calculated significant correlations for systolic blood pressure and heart weight or heart weight-to-tibia length ratio (data not shown). To determine whether increases in cardiac Ang II content also led to morphological changes, we examined collagen deposition by Sirius Red staining of histological sections of hearts from transgenic mice. We observed a thickening of left ventricular wall and interventricular septum (2A) and clearly increased perivascular and interstitial fibrosis (2A, 2C) in hypertrophied hearts from hypertensive transgenic mice (Fig. 4,a–h). Interestingly, we also observed a significant increase in interstitial fibrosis in hearts from normotensive Ang II-producing mice (1B). Analysis of Sirius Red staining from these sections revealed a 38% augmentation of collagen density (p < 0.05) as compared with normal mice at 10–12 weeks (Fig. 4, i–k). This finding demonstrates that Ang II in the heart directly stimulates the deposition of collagen in the cardiac interstitium. To rule out the possibility that the absence of cardiac hypertrophy in the Ang II-producing mice (1B) could be due to a decrease in cardiac angiotensin receptor density as a result of chronic local elevations in Ang II, we carried out radioligand binding assays on membrane preparations from non-transgenic and transgenic mice (1B). In normal mice, we found an angiotensin receptor density of 22.5 ± 0.3 fmol/mg of protein. The binding of 125I-[Sar1, Ile8]Ang II could largely (>95%) be blocked by 10−6 mol/liter losartan (specific angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist) but not by 10−6 mol/liter PD123319 (specific angiotensin II type 2 receptor ligand), indicating that the AT1 receptor is the major receptor type that is present in the mouse heart. In cardiac membranes from Ang II-producing (1B) mice, we did not observe a significantly different receptor density (21.5 ± 1.9 fmol/mg of protein) nor did we detect any differences in receptor affinities (data not shown). To further test whether the mice with only local cardiac increases in Ang II (1B) had lost the ability to mount a cardiac hypertrophic response to Ang II, we implanted transgenic and non-transgenic littermates with osmotic minipumps releasing either saline or Ang II during 2 weeks. We then collected the hearts of these mice, weighed them, and prepared sections for histochemistry. Systemic administration of Ang II by osmotic minipumps increased systolic blood pressure to the same extent in Ang II-producing mice (1B) and non-transgenic controls, and the rise in systolic blood pressure was accompanied by a similar elevation of heart weight-to-body weight ratio in both groups (Fig.5, a and b). We examined Sirius Red-stained cardiac sections and observed severe perivascular fibrosis extending into the surrounding tissue and development of interstitial fibrotic lesions in both hypertensive groups (Fig. 5, c–f). In the saline-treated groups, we did not see any alteration in systolic blood pressure, heart weight, or cardiac fibrosis. Thus, elevated cardiac Ang II production did not have any additional effects in mounting a response to the actions of increased circulating Ang II levels. In the present study we have used a novel technique to differentiate for the first time between the local and peripheral effects of chronic elevations of Ang II on cardiac pathologies. To do this, we have made use of transgenes that express Ang II-producing fusion proteins in cardiomyocytes. Intracellular cleavage of the fusion protein in the secretory pathway by the protease furin leads to the secretion of excised Ang II into the cardiac interstitial space.In vivo, the formation of the peptides in the heart was evidenced by intact cardiac Ang II and fsAng II levels that are 20–40- and 600–6000-fold higher, respectively, than the normal cardiac Ang II level. The substantially different angiotensin peptide levels between Ang II- and fsAng II-producing hearts might be explained by the proline in the amino-terminal extension of fsAng II, which could protect this peptide against rapid degradation by aminopeptidases (24Mentlein R. FEBS Lett. 1988; 234: 251-256Crossref PubMed Scopus (192) Google Scholar). The different cardiac angiotensin levels between transgenic lines were also reflected by the degree of leakage of the peptide from the cardiac interstitial space into the circulation and its subsequent effect on systolic blood pressure. The mice with the highest cardiac overflow of angiotensin peptide (2A) had already developed hypertension at 5–6 weeks (the earliest age at which we could reliably measure blood pressure). In the line with moderate spillage (2C), the increase of systolic blood pressure was more modest and became apparent only in older mice (10–12 weeks). In mice expressing the Ang II-producing fusion protein (1B), the amount of Ang II leaking from the heart into the circulation was insufficient to affect either plasma Ang II levels or systolic blood pressure. Ventricular enlargement in transgenic mice was observed in the hypertensive lines 2A and 2C and only in line 1B following the implantation of Ang II-releasing minipumps. The augmentation of ventricular mass in these lines appears to be a consequence of the peripheral actions of Ang II rather than a result of its direct growth-promoting effect on cardiomyocytes. The inability of Ang II to directly stimulate cardiac growth is best illustrated by lines 2C and 1B. The fsAng II-producing mice of line 2C slowly develop hypertension, which only becomes significantly different from controls at 12 weeks in parallel with all the indices for cardiac hypertrophy. We could not detect any significant indication of cardiac hypertrophy at 5–6 weeks even though these animals have cardiac fsAng II levels similar to those seen at 12 weeks. Normotensive Ang II-producing mice (1B) have 20–40-fold elevated cardiac Ang II levels as compared with control without altered ventricular weights. One might argue that these mice have become somehow insensitive for the action of Ang II. However, the number of angiotensin receptors found on cardiac cells was not changed, and the augmented interstitial fibrosis demonstrates that the cardiac Ang II is indeed active. Recently, some reports appeared that aimed to study the cardiac effects of Ang II by means of targeted overexpression of RAS components in the mouse heart (10Hein L. Stevens M.E. Barsh G.S. Pratt R.E. Kobilka B.K. Dzau V.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 6391-6396Crossref PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar, 11Mazzolai L. Nussberger J. Aubert J.F. Brunner D.B. Gabbiani G. Brunner H.R. Pedrazzini T. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 1324-1330Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar, 12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar, 13Prescott G. Silversides D.W. Chiu L.S.M. Reudelhuber T.L. Physiol. Genomics. 2000; 4: 67-73Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). In all these models, cardiac hypertrophy was observed; however, this was not necessarily associated with cardiac Ang II signaling. Ventricular enlargement was accompanied with hypertension (13Prescott G. Silversides D.W. Chiu L.S.M. Reudelhuber T.L. Physiol. Genomics. 2000; 4: 67-73Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) or leakage of RAS components into the circulation (11Mazzolai L. Nussberger J. Aubert J.F. Brunner D.B. Gabbiani G. Brunner H.R. Pedrazzini T. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 1324-1330Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar), thereby interfering with the systemic RAS. Our findings seem to be in disagreement with the observation that overexpression of the murine AT1a (10Hein L. Stevens M.E. Barsh G.S. Pratt R.E. Kobilka B.K. Dzau V.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 6391-6396Crossref PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar) or human AT1 receptor (12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar) in the hearts of transgenic mice led to increased cardiac signaling of the AT1 receptor and growth of atrial (10Hein L. Stevens M.E. Barsh G.S. Pratt R.E. Kobilka B.K. Dzau V.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 6391-6396Crossref PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar, 12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar) and ventricular (12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar) cardiomyocytes independent of blood pressure (12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar). These models mimic a state of elevated AT1 receptor expression in the heart that may occur under pathological conditions. It has been shown that cardiac AT1a receptor mRNA level and receptor density are increased following myocardial infarction (MI) in rats (26Nio Y. Matsubara H. Murasawa S. Kanasaki M. Inada M. J. Clin. Invest. 1995; 95: 46-54Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). In mice with a knockout of this receptor, ventricular remodeling was attenuated and survival was improved following MI (27Harada K. Sugaya T. Murakami K. Yazaki Y. Komuro I. Circulation. 1999; 100: 2093-2099Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar). These observations suggest an involvement of increased cardiac expression of the AT1 receptor in the development and maintenance of structural remodeling following MI. In our model, with the abundant presence of ligand in healthy mice, the number of cardiac AT1 receptors may have been a limiting factor. Another possible explanation could be that the resulting pathologies are only apparent after an extended period of time. For example, in the mice overexpressing the human AT1 receptor, cardiac hypertrophy only becomes apparent after 3–4 months (12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar), suggesting the requirement of additional conditions, such as aging, leading to the phenotype. In the Ang II-producing mice (line 1B), no signs of cardiac hypertrophy were observed even up to 4 months (data not shown). Therefore, Ang II signaling alone is not a switch that can trigger an immediate hypertrophic response in cardiomyocytes in vivo as opposed to the direct growth-promoting properties of the peptide observed in vitro (28Sadoshima J. Xu Y. Slayter H.S. Izumo S. Cell. 1993; 75: 977-984Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1163) Google Scholar, 29Liu Y. Leri A. Li B. Wang X. Cheng W. Kajstura J. Anversa P. Circ. Res. 1998; 82: 1145-1159Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). The structural remodeling of the heart that we observed in all hypertensive transgenic mice may have arisen from both the hemodynamic and humoral effects of Ang II (1Weber K.T. Brilla C.G. Circulation. 1991; 83: 1849-1865Crossref PubMed Scopus (1892) Google Scholar, 30Swynghedauw B. Physiol. Rev. 1999; 79: 215-262Crossref PubMed Scopus (1166) Google Scholar). It has been reported that cardiac AT1 signaling is not a prerequisite in pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy (31Hamawaki M. Coffman T.M. Lashus A. Koide M. Zile M.R. Oliverio M.I. DeFreyte G. Cooper G.4. Carabello B.A. Am. J. Physiol. 1998; 274: H868-H873PubMed Google Scholar, 32Harada K. Komuro I. Shiojima I. Hayashi D. Kudoh S. Mizuno T. Kijima K. Matsubara H. Sugaya T. Murakami K. Yazaki Y. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1952-1959Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar) and fibrosis (32Harada K. Komuro I. Shiojima I. Hayashi D. Kudoh S. Mizuno T. Kijima K. Matsubara H. Sugaya T. Murakami K. Yazaki Y. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1952-1959Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar). Elevated circulating Ang II levels may also induce the production and release of hormones such as aldosterone and endothelin, which are known to influence ventricular remodeling (33Gomez S.E. Steroids. 1995; 60: 69-72Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar, 34Stasch J.P. Hirth-Dietrich C. Frobel K. Wegner M. Am. J. Hypertens. 1995; 8: 1128-1134Crossref PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar, 35Young M. Head G. Funder J. Am. J. Physiol. 1995; 269: E657-E662PubMed Google Scholar, 36Kaddoura S. Firth J.D. Boheler K.R. Sugden P.H. Poole-Wilson P.A. Circulation. 1996; 93: 2068-2079Crossref PubMed Scopus (132) Google Scholar, 37Ammarguellat F. Larouche I. Schiffrin E.L. Circulation. 2001; 103: 319-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar). In normotensive Ang II-producing mice with unaltered plasma Ang II levels, we detected a significant increase in interstitial fibrosis as compared with non-transgenic controls. This observation points to a direct effect of Ang II on cardiac cells and is in agreement with earlier reports that propose Ang II-induced cardiac fibrosis independent of blood pressure (8Kim S. Ohta K. Hamaguchi A. Yukimura T. Miura K. Iwao H. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1252-1259Crossref PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar, 12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar). Interstitial fibrosis without perivascular fibrosis was present in transgenic mice following overexpression of the human AT1 receptor (12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar) or a constitutively active mutant of the murine Gαq subunit (38Mende U. Kagen A. Cohen A. Aramburu J. Schoen F.J. Neer E.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 13893-13898Crossref PubMed Scopus (225) Google Scholar) in cardiomyocytes. These observations support the contention that the stimulation of pathways converging to activated Gαq proteins (e.g. Ang II, catecholamines, and endothelin) can lead to interstitial collagen deposition in the heart. Cardiac Ang II can mediate its fibrotic effects via fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes since both express the AT1 receptor (39Matsubara H. Kanasaki M. Murasawa S. Tsukaguchi Y. Nio Y. Inada M. J. Clin. Invest. 1994; 93: 1592-1601Crossref PubMed Scopus (149) Google Scholar, 40Matsusaka T. Katori H. Inagami T. Fogo A. Ichikawa I. J. Clin. Invest. 1999; 103: 1451-1458Crossref PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar). Ang II stimulates the proliferation of fibroblasts (41Sadoshima J. Izumo S. Circ. Res. 1993; 73: 413-423Crossref PubMed Scopus (1292) Google Scholar) and their production of collagen (42Brilla C.G. Zhou G. Matsubara L. Weber K.T. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1994; 26: 809-820Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (630) Google Scholar) and transforming growth factor β(43). Recently, Ang II was also found to promote cardiac aldosterone production (44Silvestre J.S. Robert V. Heymes C. Aupetit-Faisant B. Mouas C. Moalic J.M. Swynghedauw B. Delcayre C. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 4883-4891Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (437) Google Scholar), although it is unknown in which cell type. In our transgenic mice, Ang II is produced and released by cardiomyocytes. Therefore, the interstitial fibrosis that we observed in Ang II-producing mice can result from a paracrine effect of Ang II on fibroblasts or from other mediators that are released upon autocrine stimulation of cardiomyocytes, as previously proposed by others (12Paradis P. Dali-Youcef N. Paradis F.W. Thibault G. Nemer M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 931-936Crossref PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar,40Matsusaka T. Katori H. Inagami T. Fogo A. Ichikawa I. J. Clin. Invest. 1999; 103: 1451-1458Crossref PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar). The characteristics of such mediators are unidentified, although transforming growth factor β and endothelin seem to be good candidates (8Kim S. Ohta K. Hamaguchi A. Yukimura T. Miura K. Iwao H. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1252-1259Crossref PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar, 37Ammarguellat F. Larouche I. Schiffrin E.L. Circulation. 2001; 103: 319-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar, 41Sadoshima J. Izumo S. Circ. Res. 1993; 73: 413-423Crossref PubMed Scopus (1292) Google Scholar, 45Roberts A.B. Sporn M.B. Assoian R.K. Smith J.M. Roche N.S. Wakefield L.M. Heine U.I. Liotta L.A. Falanga V. Kehrl J.H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986; 83: 4167-4171Crossref PubMed Scopus (2412) Google Scholar, 46Guarda E. Katwa L.C. Myers P.R. Tyagi S.C. Weber K.T. Cardiovasc. Res. 1993; 27: 2130-2134Crossref PubMed Scopus (277) Google Scholar). In summary, we have developed transgenic mice that express a fusion protein leading to the synthesis and release of an Ang II peptide in cardiomyocytes. Expression of the transgene led to very high Ang II levels in the heart and release of the peptide into the circulation. When released at sufficient amounts, this circulating Ang II leads to hypertension and structural remodeling of the heart, which is characterized by ventricular enlargement and cardiac fibrosis. Elevated cardiac Ang II levels alone do not directly induce cardiac hypertrophy but do increase interstitial fibrosis. Our findings are the first to discriminate between the local and systemic effects of Ang II on the heart. We acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Diana Raiwet and Chantal Mercure, the expertise of Isabelle Daneau in the generation of transgenic lines, the help of Gaétan Thibault with radioligand binding assays, and the helpful suggestions of Gary Prescott and Christian Deschepper." @default.
- W2134040438 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2134040438 creator A5008802220 @default.
- W2134040438 creator A5041016891 @default.
- W2134040438 creator A5058214985 @default.
- W2134040438 creator A5063192986 @default.
- W2134040438 creator A5087116722 @default.
- W2134040438 date "2001-11-01" @default.
- W2134040438 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2134040438 title "Use of a Biological Peptide Pump to Study Chronic Peptide Hormone Action in Transgenic Mice" @default.
- W2134040438 cites W1843891181 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W1889002087 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W1965667964 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W1977152294 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W1977609966 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W1995925893 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2004775541 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2015582757 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2016836437 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2017884988 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2020159458 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2021911372 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2026178423 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2051124233 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2068456400 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2070281444 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2082110280 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2083834362 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2085250186 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2086041680 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2092703293 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2119869567 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2120863041 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2124579523 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2127986003 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2132625546 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2135074047 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2139145378 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2141986088 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2142393775 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2144757940 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2149060182 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2153981371 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2154684959 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2155718907 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2162489885 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2168476587 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2170144089 @default.
- W2134040438 cites W2331945067 @default.
- W2134040438 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m106132200" @default.
- W2134040438 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11551931" @default.
- W2134040438 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W2134040438 type Work @default.
- W2134040438 sameAs 2134040438 @default.
- W2134040438 citedByCount "80" @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382012 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382013 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382014 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382015 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382016 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382017 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382018 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382019 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382020 @default.
- W2134040438 countsByYear W21340404382021 @default.
- W2134040438 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2134040438 hasAuthorship W2134040438A5008802220 @default.
- W2134040438 hasAuthorship W2134040438A5041016891 @default.
- W2134040438 hasAuthorship W2134040438A5058214985 @default.
- W2134040438 hasAuthorship W2134040438A5063192986 @default.
- W2134040438 hasAuthorship W2134040438A5087116722 @default.
- W2134040438 hasBestOaLocation W21340404381 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C102230213 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C141035611 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C2779281246 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C56191518 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C71315377 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C102230213 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C104317684 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C121332964 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C134018914 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C141035611 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C185592680 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C2779281246 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C2780791683 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C55493867 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C56191518 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C62520636 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C71315377 @default.
- W2134040438 hasConceptScore W2134040438C86803240 @default.