FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2135002650> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2135002650 abstract "The emergence of what is called the social web and the continuing stream of new applications and community-based platforms including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and others had a substantial impact on recommender systems research and practice over the last years in different ways.First, today's web users are more willing to share more about themselves than before the Web 2.0, thus providing more information sources that can be leveraged in the user modeling and recommendation process. Furthermore, the newly available information sources can not only be used to optimize the recommendations for an individual user, but can also help to identify more general patterns and trends in the behavior of the community that can be exploited by other applications.Second, personalization, information filtering and recommendation are often the central functionality of many of these social web based applications. On typical social networks, users for example get recommendations for news to read, songs to listen to, groups to join, friends to follow, people to connect or jobs that might be interesting.These developments lead to different challenges to be addressed in recommender systems research. On the one hand, for example, the question arises of how to effectively combine the huge variety of information sources for improved recommendations. On the other hand, regarding the new opportunities for applying recommender systems in social web environments, in many cases new techniques are required to address the particularities of the domain or to deal with scalability issues.The ACM RecSys 2014 Workshop on Recommender Systems and the Social Web aims to be a platform for researchers from academia and industry as well as for practitioners to present and discuss the various challenges and possible solutions related to all aspects of social web recommendations. The call for papers correspondingly covered a variety of topics in this area including all sorts of applications of recommender systems technology and their interfaces; collective knowledge creation and topic emergence;context-aware and group recommendation approaches; and case studies and empirical evaluations.This year's workshop was already the sixth in a series of successful workshops co-located with the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems since 2009. Again, we received several submissions from researchers from academia and industry which were thoroughly reviewed and selected for presentation at the workshop by a program committee of international experts in the field.The papers submitted to the workshop addressed a number of different topics and put forward novel proposals to build social web recommender system. In the context of applying recommendation technology to information personalization and resource ranking problems in Social Web environments, the submitted papers for example dealt with the problem of ranking community-provided product reviews based on opinion mining or with the recommendation of friends on social networks. As an example of how to leverage Social Web information to build better systems, one of the works proposed to analyze the characteristics of publicly shared music playlists to better understand how future music recommendation systems should be designed. Finally, another contribution from industry addressed challenges and lessons learned when building large-scale collaborative filtering solutions on Social Web platforms in a real-world environment." @default.
• W2135002650 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2135002650 creator A5005545405 @default.
• W2135002650 creator A5022799238 @default.
• W2135002650 creator A5054225034 @default.
• W2135002650 creator A5082580430 @default.
• W2135002650 date "2012-09-09" @default.
• W2135002650 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2135002650 title "4th ACM RecSys workshop on recommender systems and the social web" @default.
• W2135002650 doi "https://doi.org/10.1145/2365952.2366039" @default.
• W2135002650 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2135002650 type Work @default.
• W2135002650 sameAs 2135002650 @default.
• W2135002650 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2135002650 countsByYear W21350026502013 @default.
• W2135002650 countsByYear W21350026502018 @default.
• W2135002650 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2135002650 hasAuthorship W2135002650A5005545405 @default.
• W2135002650 hasAuthorship W2135002650A5022799238 @default.
• W2135002650 hasAuthorship W2135002650A5054225034 @default.
• W2135002650 hasAuthorship W2135002650A5082580430 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConcept C557471498 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConceptScore W2135002650C136764020 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConceptScore W2135002650C23123220 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConceptScore W2135002650C2522767166 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConceptScore W2135002650C41008148 @default.
• W2135002650 hasConceptScore W2135002650C557471498 @default.
• W2135002650 hasLocation W21350026501 @default.
• W2135002650 hasOpenAccess W2135002650 @default.
• W2135002650 hasPrimaryLocation W21350026501 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2036147130 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2117346966 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2348159088 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2369936857 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W240673130 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2525876841 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2809363009 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2883909875 @default.
• W2135002650 hasRelatedWork W2968745142 @default.
• W2135002650 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2135002650 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2135002650 magId "2135002650" @default.
• W2135002650 workType "article" @default.