Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2135175589> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 63 of
63
with 100 items per page.
- W2135175589 endingPage "493" @default.
- W2135175589 startingPage "468" @default.
- W2135175589 abstract "The condictiones present interesting and difficult challenges of classification for the modern South African jurist. Their casuistic development has made them difficult to work with, and for a long time it was argued that a single general enrichment action should take their place. But the Supreme Court of Appeal in McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC 2001 3 SA 482 (SCA) chose not to follow this path, and instead preferred the idea that a general enrichment action should be subsidiary to the traditional actions. This has breathed new life into debates on the future of the condictiones. This article first examines the current range of application of the condictiones. It then proceeds to show how the courts in the first decade of the 21st century seem to have eschewed the technicalities inherent in pleading the condictiones, and have preferred rather to resolve cases by applying the general requirements of enrichment liability, in contrast to the injunction in McCarthy. The difficulty with this approach is the lack of substance that is given to the sine causa requirement. The article proceeds to examine the various theories about how we in South Africa should understand and give content to the sine causa requirement. This provides a springboard for considering the possible futures of the condictiones. Broadly, it seems that two options are possible: either to collapse the condictiones into one action to deal with cases of enrichment by transfer; or largely to retain the status quo. The most recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeal indicate that the latter, more conservative option is likely to be chosen in the short-term. If this approach is to be adopted, it will require a further review of how each of the constituent condictiones fulfils a particular function. A revisionist view of the condictio indebiti is postulated by way of example." @default.
- W2135175589 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2135175589 creator A5033753884 @default.
- W2135175589 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W2135175589 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2135175589 title "Reflections on the sine causa requirement and the condictiones in South African law" @default.
- W2135175589 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2135175589 type Work @default.
- W2135175589 sameAs 2135175589 @default.
- W2135175589 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2135175589 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2135175589 hasAuthorship W2135175589A5033753884 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C2780928512 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C121332964 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C144024400 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C17744445 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C190253527 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C199539241 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C2778272461 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C2778449503 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C2780791683 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C2780928512 @default.
- W2135175589 hasConceptScore W2135175589C62520636 @default.
- W2135175589 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2135175589 hasLocation W21351755891 @default.
- W2135175589 hasOpenAccess W2135175589 @default.
- W2135175589 hasPrimaryLocation W21351755891 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W1538718853 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W1540509471 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W1573234990 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W1584919389 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W1594654851 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W167709108 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W174091664 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W2055819939 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W2254218913 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W2284686535 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W2341736787 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W2586063221 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W2915823883 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W30231803 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W3036890132 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W3123734138 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W321381592 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W333527807 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W79122661 @default.
- W2135175589 hasRelatedWork W1857577145 @default.
- W2135175589 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W2135175589 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2135175589 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2135175589 magId "2135175589" @default.
- W2135175589 workType "article" @default.