FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2135193764> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2135193764 endingPage "743.e3" @default.
• W2135193764 startingPage "738" @default.
• W2135193764 abstract "Purpose To develop and use a standardized patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) to address two study questions: (1) What is the overall level of satisfaction with resident care? (2) Can the study questionnaire be used to detect differences in the level of satisfaction patients have with care delivered by individual residents? Design Cross-sectional study comprising a survey administration to an ophthalmology resident clinic population of an existing PSQ, namely, the Duke Clinics Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire—adapted for use in ophthalmology ambulatory clinic settings. The questionnaire subscales roughly correlate to 3 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) general competencies: interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and technical quality of care. Participants The survey was completed by 167 qualified patients of the Durham, North Carolina Veterans Administration Hospital Eye Clinic, a clinic staffed by residents of Duke Eye Center. Methods Patients were administered a standardized PSQ assessing 4 areas of care: interpersonal manner, communication, technical quality, and professionalism. Overall levels of satisfaction with care were assessed; bivariate analyses were used to assess scores by resident. Primary outcomes were measured as levels of satisfaction on a 5-point scale (1 = lowest satisfaction, 5 = greatest). Outcomes were calculated separately for the 4 satisfaction subscales. Main Outcome Measure Patient satisfaction using a standardized PSQ. Results Mean scores were 4.46 for interpersonal manner, 4.46 for communication, 4.27 for technical quality, and 4.63 for professionalism. Analysis by resident yielded statistically significant (P<0.05) differences in scores between residents on the interpersonal manner (P = 0.02) and communication (P = 0.03) subscales. Conclusions The ACGME has established 6 areas of patient care “general competencies” in which all residency programs are mandated to train and evaluate residents, creating a need for the development of new measurement tools. Using a modified version of an established PSQ to measure 3 general competencies, we found that patients were generally satisfied with resident care, and that differences in patient satisfaction with the interpersonal and communication skills of individual residents can be identified using our PSQ. The PSQ described here may be a useful assessment tool for ACGME-mandated resident core competency in interpersonal and communication skills. To develop and use a standardized patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) to address two study questions: (1) What is the overall level of satisfaction with resident care? (2) Can the study questionnaire be used to detect differences in the level of satisfaction patients have with care delivered by individual residents? Cross-sectional study comprising a survey administration to an ophthalmology resident clinic population of an existing PSQ, namely, the Duke Clinics Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire—adapted for use in ophthalmology ambulatory clinic settings. The questionnaire subscales roughly correlate to 3 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) general competencies: interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and technical quality of care. The survey was completed by 167 qualified patients of the Durham, North Carolina Veterans Administration Hospital Eye Clinic, a clinic staffed by residents of Duke Eye Center. Patients were administered a standardized PSQ assessing 4 areas of care: interpersonal manner, communication, technical quality, and professionalism. Overall levels of satisfaction with care were assessed; bivariate analyses were used to assess scores by resident. Primary outcomes were measured as levels of satisfaction on a 5-point scale (1 = lowest satisfaction, 5 = greatest). Outcomes were calculated separately for the 4 satisfaction subscales. Patient satisfaction using a standardized PSQ. Mean scores were 4.46 for interpersonal manner, 4.46 for communication, 4.27 for technical quality, and 4.63 for professionalism. Analysis by resident yielded statistically significant (P<0.05) differences in scores between residents on the interpersonal manner (P = 0.02) and communication (P = 0.03) subscales. The ACGME has established 6 areas of patient care “general competencies” in which all residency programs are mandated to train and evaluate residents, creating a need for the development of new measurement tools. Using a modified version of an established PSQ to measure 3 general competencies, we found that patients were generally satisfied with resident care, and that differences in patient satisfaction with the interpersonal and communication skills of individual residents can be identified using our PSQ. The PSQ described here may be a useful assessment tool for ACGME-mandated resident core competency in interpersonal and communication skills." @default.
• W2135193764 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2135193764 creator A5001889758 @default.
• W2135193764 creator A5033501630 @default.
• W2135193764 creator A5039866059 @default.
• W2135193764 creator A5070015133 @default.
• W2135193764 creator A5088284908 @default.
• W2135193764 date "2008-04-01" @default.
• W2135193764 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2135193764 title "Use of a Standardized Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire to Assess the Quality of Care Provided by Ophthalmology Residents" @default.
• W2135193764 cites W194394706 @default.
• W2135193764 cites W1988220380 @default.
• W2135193764 cites W2019209759 @default.
• W2135193764 cites W2023313449 @default.
• W2135193764 cites W2030248541 @default.
• W2135193764 cites W2034384919 @default.
• W2135193764 cites W2073708651 @default.
• W2135193764 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.033" @default.
• W2135193764 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17716737" @default.
• W2135193764 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2135193764 type Work @default.
• W2135193764 sameAs 2135193764 @default.
• W2135193764 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642012 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642013 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642014 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642016 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642017 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642018 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642019 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642021 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642022 @default.
• W2135193764 countsByYear W21351937642023 @default.
• W2135193764 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2135193764 hasAuthorship W2135193764A5001889758 @default.
• W2135193764 hasAuthorship W2135193764A5033501630 @default.
• W2135193764 hasAuthorship W2135193764A5039866059 @default.
• W2135193764 hasAuthorship W2135193764A5070015133 @default.
• W2135193764 hasAuthorship W2135193764A5088284908 @default.
• W2135193764 hasBestOaLocation W21351937642 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C15744967 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C159110408 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C164850336 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C2775944032 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C2779767262 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C509550671 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C512399662 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C61521584 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C71924100 @default.
• W2135193764 hasConceptScore W2135193764C77805123 @default.
• W2135193764 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2135193764 hasLocation W21351937641 @default.
• W2135193764 hasLocation W21351937642 @default.
• W2135193764 hasLocation W21351937643 @default.
• W2135193764 hasOpenAccess W2135193764 @default.
• W2135193764 hasPrimaryLocation W21351937641 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W106761853 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W1989177582 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W2042827182 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W2130352968 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W2177306513 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W2418949325 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W2564221468 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W3035671276 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W3202195493 @default.
• W2135193764 hasRelatedWork W4226190770 @default.
• W2135193764 hasVolume "115" @default.
• W2135193764 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2135193764 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2135193764 magId "2135193764" @default.
• W2135193764 workType "article" @default.