FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2135439945> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2135439945 endingPage "1336" @default.
• W2135439945 startingPage "1329" @default.
• W2135439945 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Oct 2009Optimizing Prostate Cancer Detection: 8 Versus 12-Core Biopsy Protocol Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, Margot H. Wink, Charalampos Mamoulakis, Niels Wondergem, Fiebo J.C. ten Kate, Koos Zwinderman, Theo M. de Reijke, and Hessel Wijkstra Jean J.M.C.H. de la RosetteJean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Financial interest and/or other relationship with Galil Medical, BSC and American Medical Systems. More articles by this author , Margot H. WinkMargot H. Wink Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author , Charalampos MamoulakisCharalampos Mamoulakis Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author , Niels WondergemNiels Wondergem Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author , Fiebo J.C. ten KateFiebo J.C. ten Kate Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author , Koos ZwindermanKoos Zwinderman Department of Epidemiology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author , Theo M. de ReijkeTheo M. de Reijke Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author , and Hessel WijkstraHessel Wijkstra Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.037AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We compared prostate cancer detection rates achieved using an 8 and 12-core biopsy protocol in a clinical population to determine the significance of additional transition zone sampling on repeat biopsy. Materials and Methods: Between September 2004 and September 2007, 269 eligible patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer referred to our department were randomized to an 8-core lateral (group 1) or a 12-core lateral and parasagittal (group 2) transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy protocol. Study inclusion criteria were age dependent increased serum prostate specific antigen (1.25 ng/ml or greater at ages less than 50 years, 1.75 or greater at ages 50 to less than 60 years, 2.25 or greater at ages 60 to less than 70 years and 3.25 or greater at ages 70 years or greater), positive digital rectal examination and/or suspicious transrectal ultrasound. After negative first round biopsy patients underwent 12-core biopsy, including 4 transition zone cores. Results: Nine patients were excluded from analysis because of protocol violation or they did not complete the whole biopsy procedure due to discomfort. The cancer detection rate in groups 1 and 2 did not differ significantly (34.1% or 45 of 132 patients and 38.3% or 49 of 128, respectively, p = 0.48). Detected cancer median Gleason scores were similar in the groups. Of 109 patients who underwent repeat biopsy prostate cancer was detected in 20 (14.4%), of whom 9 had positive cores from the transition zone and 6 had positive biopsies only from the transition zone. Conclusions: There are no statistically significant differences in the prostate cancer detection rate between 8 and 12-core prostate biopsy protocols. Transition zone biopsies contribute to prostate cancer detection in a repeat biopsy protocol. References 1 : Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol1989; 142: 71. Abstract, Google Scholar 2 : C: The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology1997; 50: 562. Google Scholar 3 : Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology1999; 54: 486. Google Scholar 4 : Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. J Urol1998; 159: 1247. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol2006; 175: 1605. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol1994; 151: 1571. Abstract, Google Scholar 7 : Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology2000; 55: 553. Google Scholar 8 : A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol2000; 164: 388. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity. BJU Int2004; 94: 307. Google Scholar 10 : Can a 12 core prostate biopsy increase the detection rate of prostate cancer versus 6 core?: a prospective randomized study in Korea. Yonsei Med J2004; 45: 671. Google Scholar 11 : Optimization of prostatic biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing the sextant biopsy with a 10-core biopsy: Impact of prostatic region of sampling. Urol Int2005; 74: 203. Google Scholar 12 : The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol2000; 163: 163. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Extended 12-core prostate biopsy increases both the detection of prostate cancer and the accuracy of Gleason score. Eur Urol2006; 49: 49. Google Scholar 14 : An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol2004; 45: 444. Google Scholar 15 : Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough?. Urol Oncol2003; 21: 135. Google Scholar 16 : Randomized prospective study of periprostatic local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Urology2002; 59: 405. Google Scholar 17 : EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol2008; 53: 68. Google Scholar 18 : Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection?: Results from the Tyrol screening project. Eur Urol2005; 48: 916. Google Scholar 19 : Routine transition zone and seminal vesicle biopsies in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies are not indicated. J Urol1997; 157: 204. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Impact of transition zone biopsies in detection and evaluation of prostate cancer. Eur Urol1998; 33: 542. Google Scholar 21 : Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. J Natl Cancer Inst2007; 99: 1484. Google Scholar 22 : Transition zone biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol2000; 37: 675. Google Scholar 23 : Is one set of sextant biopsies enough to rule out prostate cancer?: Influence of transition and total prostate volumes on prostate cancer yield. Eur Urol2000; 38: 218. Google Scholar 24 : Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?. J Urol2001; 166: 2181. Link, Google Scholar 25 : Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific antigen. J Urol2000; 163: 806. Link, Google Scholar 26 : Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med2004; 350: 2239. Google Scholar 27 : Characteristics of prostate cancers detected at low PSA levels. Prostate2004; 58: 232. Google Scholar © 2009 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byIrani J, Blanchet P, Salomon L, Coloby P, Hubert J, Malavaud B and Mottet N (2018) Is an Extended 20-Core Prostate Biopsy Protocol More Efficient than the Standard 12-Core? A Randomized Multicenter TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 1, (77-83), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.Hadaschik B, Kuru T, Tulea C, Rieker P, Popeneciu I, Simpfendörfer T, Huber J, Zogal P, Teber D, Pahernik S, Roethke M, Zamecnik P, Roth W, Sakas G, Schlemmer H and Hohenfellner M (2018) A Novel Stereotactic Prostate Biopsy System Integrating Pre-Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Live Ultrasound FusionJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 6, (2214-2220), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011. Volume 182Issue 4October 2009Page: 1329-1336 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2009 by American Urological AssociationKeywordsprostateprostatic neoplasmsultrasonographybiopsyAcknowledgmentsFiebo J. W. ten Kate assisted with the study.MetricsAuthor Information Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Financial interest and/or other relationship with Galil Medical, BSC and American Medical Systems. More articles by this author Margot H. Wink Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Charalampos Mamoulakis Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Niels Wondergem Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Fiebo J.C. ten Kate Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Koos Zwinderman Department of Epidemiology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Theo M. de Reijke Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Hessel Wijkstra Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2135439945 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5005238316 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5017368781 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5033540200 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5041526805 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5053846066 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5077027371 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5082495905 @default.
• W2135439945 creator A5087701815 @default.
• W2135439945 date "2009-10-01" @default.
• W2135439945 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2135439945 title "Optimizing Prostate Cancer Detection: 8 Versus 12-Core Biopsy Protocol" @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1556669129 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1571849492 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1969848722 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1975695676 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1977810717 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1983419716 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1986257592 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1986581541 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W1989978030 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2001636670 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2025445728 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2027821451 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2039250830 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2040591493 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2044037618 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2048931906 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2050450721 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2057469006 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2062842417 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2064485308 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2065107601 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2066784320 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2120154978 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2123230901 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2137394592 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2140139520 @default.
• W2135439945 cites W2140687262 @default.
• W2135439945 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.037" @default.
• W2135439945 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19683269" @default.
• W2135439945 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2135439945 type Work @default.
• W2135439945 sameAs 2135439945 @default.
• W2135439945 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452012 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452013 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452014 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452015 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452016 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452018 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452019 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452020 @default.
• W2135439945 countsByYear W21354399452021 @default.
• W2135439945 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5005238316 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5017368781 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5033540200 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5041526805 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5053846066 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5077027371 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5082495905 @default.
• W2135439945 hasAuthorship W2135439945A5087701815 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2164484 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2781217009 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C2985322473 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C3019914693 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C121608353 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C126322002 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C126838900 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C126894567 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C142724271 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C143998085 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C159985019 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C192562407 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C204787440 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C2164484 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C2775934546 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C2776235491 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C2780192828 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C2780385302 @default.
• W2135439945 hasConceptScore W2135439945C2781217009 @default.

• next