FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2135847087> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2135847087 abstract "This study was conducted to describe a high school engineering curriculum, identify teaching strategies used to increase math and science literacy, and discover challenges and constraints that occur during its development and delivery, as well as what strategies are used to overcome these obstacles. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the engineering instructor. In addition, students were observed and curriculum documents, teacher lesson plans, and teacher resources were examined. Concepts created the platform for delivery, curricular trial and error was at work, science and engineering competitions were leveraged as a basis for learning activities, and project based learning and teaching was critical. There was a clear emphasis on creative thought and work. Assessment of student learning was dubious and elusive and stakeholders tended to be uneasy with this new pedegogy. Financial and instructional support through business partnership and administrative support were found to be critical strategies used to overcome obsticles identified. David Stricker is an Assistant Professor at University of Wisconsin-Stout. He can be reached at strickerd@uwstout.edu 64 JOURNAL OF STEM TEACHER EDUCATION A Case Study: Teaching Engineering Concepts in Science The focus on improving science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education for America’s children can be traced back to the days of Sputnik and beyond. However, compared with advancements then, it has been argued that today technological development and industrial growth are increasing at an exponential rate with expanding global application (Brophy, Klein, Portsmore, Rogers, 2008). Consequently, amid concerns that the United States may not be able to compete with other nations in the future due to insufficient investment today in science and technology research and STEM education, funding initiatives such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (U.S. Department of Education, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Saving and Creating Jobs and Reforming Education) and “Race to the Top” competitive grants have been enacted in 2009 in an effort to offer substantial federal support for such initiatives (U.S. Department of Education. President Obama, U.S. Secretary of Education Duncan Announce National Competition to Advance School Reform). The support structure for STEM education does not end with tax dollars. Large private companies such as Time Warner Cable have committed $100 million in media time, and the MacArthur Foundation is supporting “National Lab Day” that will include, among other initiatives, a year-long effort to expand hands-on learning methods throughout the country. Specifically, within the STEM focus, engineering education supports the attainment of a wide range of knowledge and skills associated with comprehending and using STEM knowledge to achieve real world problem solving through design, troubleshooting, and analysis activities (Brophy, et. al., 2008). The arguments for including A Case Study: Teaching Engineering Concepts 65 engineering education into the general education curriculum are well established. Some are motivated by concerns regarding the quantity, quality, and diversity of future engineering talent (American Society for Engineering Education, 1987; National Academy of Engineering, 2005; National Research Council, 1996; International Technology Education Association, 2002) and others by the basic need for all students, in their pursuit of preparing for life, work, and citizenship in a society inundated with technology, to possess a fundamental understanding of the nature of engineering (Welty, 2008). In an attempt to address this issue, there have been a number of curricula designed to infuse engineering content into technology education courses (Dearing & Daugherty, 2004). Each of these programs proposes teaching engineering concepts or engineering design in technology education as a vehicle to address the standards for technological literacy (International Technology Education Association, 2000/2002). Similarly, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) publication Technically Speaking (Pearson and Young, 2002) emphasizes the need for all people to become technologically literate to function in the modern world. However, despite this clear need, within the technology education profession itself, the appropriate engineering curriculum required for implementation, particularly at the high school level, remains unclear. Indeed, engineering curricula exist that have been designed for implemetation, not in technology education, but rather in math and science classrooms. As a result of the choices available to teachers and school administrators, the extent to which the most effective way of delivereing engineering content to high school students remains unclear. 66 JOURNAL OF STEM TEACHER EDUCATION" @default.
• W2135847087 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2135847087 creator A5026617871 @default.
• W2135847087 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2135847087 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2135847087 title "A Case Study: Teaching Engineering Concepts in Science" @default.
• W2135847087 cites W100766589 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W106123598 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W145718704 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1495448883 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1519498364 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1527311855 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1541743525 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1557261616 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1561697184 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1568596295 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1578579662 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1580870731 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1585819273 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1601738874 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1806940748 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1859502711 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1967858307 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1972628193 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1973838802 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W1981280239 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W198316168 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2007135233 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2009915147 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2011354687 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2014323876 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2017856507 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2076031919 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2082999089 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2084146094 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2096016430 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2098477818 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2105147716 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2111490417 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2126609921 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2136339797 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2146722262 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2148374480 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2336301771 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2418530303 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2520660681 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2587448746 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2622591457 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2916910435 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W2993462951 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W3035791745 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W3041853634 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W350022389 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W55694732 @default.
• W2135847087 cites W604972776 @default.
• W2135847087 doi "https://doi.org/10.30707/jste48.2sticker" @default.
• W2135847087 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2135847087 type Work @default.
• W2135847087 sameAs 2135847087 @default.
• W2135847087 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2135847087 countsByYear W21358470872015 @default.
• W2135847087 countsByYear W21358470872019 @default.
• W2135847087 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2135847087 hasAuthorship W2135847087A5026617871 @default.
• W2135847087 hasBestOaLocation W21358470871 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C44877443 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C127413603 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C144024400 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C145420912 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C15744967 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C44877443 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C539667460 @default.
• W2135847087 hasConceptScore W2135847087C55587333 @default.
• W2135847087 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2135847087 hasLocation W21358470871 @default.
• W2135847087 hasOpenAccess W2135847087 @default.
• W2135847087 hasPrimaryLocation W21358470871 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W1542902583 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2010171853 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2043561493 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2046904434 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2604819331 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2797357684 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W283532838 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2894723147 @default.
• W2135847087 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2135847087 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W2135847087 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2135847087 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2135847087 magId "2135847087" @default.
• W2135847087 workType "article" @default.