FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2136120178> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2136120178 endingPage "8" @default.
• W2136120178 startingPage "8" @default.
• W2136120178 abstract "Patients referred to a medical admission unit (MAU) represent a broad spectrum of disease severity. In the interest of allocating resources to those who might potentially benefit most from clinical interventions, several scoring systems have been proposed as a triaging tool. Even though most scoring systems are not meant to be used on an individual level, they can support the more inexperienced doctors and nurses in assessing the risk of deterioration of their patients. We therefore performed a systematic review on the level of evidence of literature on scoring systems developed or validated in the MAU. We hypothesized that existing scoring systems would have a low level of evidence and only few systems would have been externally validated. We conducted a systematic search using Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, according to the PRISMA guidelines, on scoring systems developed to assess medical patients at admission. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality or transfer to the intensive care unit. Studies derived for only a single or few diagnoses were excluded. The ability to identify patients at risk (discriminatory power) and agreement between observed and predicted outcome (calibration) along with the method of derivation and validation (application on a new cohort) were extracted. We identified 1,655 articles. Thirty were selected for further review and 10 were included in this review. Eight systems used vital signs as variables and two relied mostly on blood tests. Nine systems were derived using regression analysis and eight included patients admitted to a MAU. Six systems used in-hospital mortality as their primary endpoint. Discriminatory power was specified for eight of the scoring systems and was acceptable or better in five of these. The calibration was only specified for four scoring systems. In none of the studies impact analysis or inter-observer reliability were analyzed. None of the systems reached the highest level of evidence. None of the 10 scoring systems presented in this article are perfect and all have their weaknesses. More research is needed before the use of scoring systems can be fully implemented to the risk assessment of acutely admitted medical patients." @default.
• W2136120178 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2136120178 creator A5005433591 @default.
• W2136120178 creator A5024486402 @default.
• W2136120178 creator A5048386817 @default.
• W2136120178 creator A5076224330 @default.
• W2136120178 creator A5086275374 @default.
• W2136120178 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2136120178 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2136120178 title "Risk scoring systems for adults admitted to the emergency department: a systematic review" @default.
• W2136120178 cites W1898928487 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W1965797730 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W1973948212 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W1992080685 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2006043271 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2007553222 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2035043769 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2039695998 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2055905393 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2058219198 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2067747050 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2075778835 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2095857282 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2102338584 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2102472244 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2110992644 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2111074581 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2116084482 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2123391883 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2137325786 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2152451063 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2157825442 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2159579486 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2169167455 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W57920232 @default.
• W2136120178 cites W2107978811 @default.
• W2136120178 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-18-8" @default.
• W2136120178 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2835641" @default.
• W2136120178 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20146829" @default.
• W2136120178 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2136120178 type Work @default.
• W2136120178 sameAs 2136120178 @default.
• W2136120178 citedByCount "96" @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782012 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782013 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782014 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782015 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782016 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782017 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782018 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782019 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782020 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782021 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782022 @default.
• W2136120178 countsByYear W21361201782023 @default.
• W2136120178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2136120178 hasAuthorship W2136120178A5005433591 @default.
• W2136120178 hasAuthorship W2136120178A5024486402 @default.
• W2136120178 hasAuthorship W2136120178A5048386817 @default.
• W2136120178 hasAuthorship W2136120178A5076224330 @default.
• W2136120178 hasAuthorship W2136120178A5086275374 @default.
• W2136120178 hasBestOaLocation W21361201781 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C2984538763 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C118552586 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C126322002 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C142724271 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C17744445 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C177713679 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C189708586 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C194828623 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C199539241 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C201903717 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C27415008 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C2776478404 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C2779134260 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C2779473830 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C2780724011 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C2984538763 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C534262118 @default.
• W2136120178 hasConceptScore W2136120178C545542383 @default.

• next