FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2136825748> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2136825748 endingPage "599" @default.
• W2136825748 startingPage "587" @default.
• W2136825748 abstract "ObjectivesTo investigate which factors and criteria are used in priority setting of pharmaceuticals, in what contexts health economic evaluations are used, and barriers to the use of health economic evaluations at micro, meso, and macro health-care levels.MethodsThe search for empirical articles was based on the MeSH index (Medical Substance Heading), including the search terms “economic evaluation,” “cost-effectiveness analysis,” “cost-utility analysis,” “cost-benefit analysis,” “pharmacoeconomic,” AND “drug cost(s),” AND “eligibility determination,” AND “decision-making,” AND “rationing,” AND formulary. The following databases were searched: PubMed, EconLit, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. More than 3100 studies were identified, 31 of which were included in this review.ResultsThe use of health economic evaluations at all three health-care levels was investigated in three countries (United States [US], United Kingdom [UK], and Sweden). Postal and telephone survey methods dominated (n = 17) followed by interviews (n = 13), document analysis (n = 10), and observations of group deliberations (n = 9). The cost-effectiveness criterion was most important at the macro level. A number of contextual uses of health economic evaluations were identified, including importantly the legitimizing of decisions, structuring the priority-setting process, and requesting additional budgets to finance expensive pharmaceuticals.ConclusionFactors that seem to support the increased use of health economic evaluations are well-developed frameworks for evaluations, the presence of health economic skills, and an explicit priority-setting process. Differences in how economic evaluations are used at macro, meso, and micro levels are attributed to differences in the preconditions at each level." @default.
• W2136825748 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2136825748 creator A5006344351 @default.
• W2136825748 date "2011-06-01" @default.
• W2136825748 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2136825748 title "Pharmaceutical Priority Setting and the Use of Health Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Literature Review" @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1490132326 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1824655992 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1890133478 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1966967738 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1981225980 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1987973304 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1988905542 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1992202814 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W1994871007 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2016206076 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2016266637 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2021913880 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2025373866 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2025886376 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2028063253 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2047529624 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2052600973 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2054913380 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2066273350 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2069765531 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2079490650 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2080317087 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2087071489 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2088395615 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2112941919 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2113837123 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2117042820 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2120416623 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2121009112 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2131142509 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2135180975 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2145197630 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2146762858 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2159920024 @default.
• W2136825748 cites W2223435718 @default.
• W2136825748 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.036" @default.
• W2136825748 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21669384" @default.
• W2136825748 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2136825748 type Work @default.
• W2136825748 sameAs 2136825748 @default.
• W2136825748 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482012 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482013 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482014 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482015 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482016 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482017 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482019 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482020 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482021 @default.
• W2136825748 countsByYear W21368257482022 @default.
• W2136825748 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2136825748 hasAuthorship W2136825748A5006344351 @default.
• W2136825748 hasBestOaLocation W21368257481 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C100406419 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C2778980733 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C524218345 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C100001284 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C100406419 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C142724271 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C144133560 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C159110408 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C160735492 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C162118730 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C162324750 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C17744445 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C199539241 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C27415008 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C2776125615 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C2778980733 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C2779473830 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C2779549880 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C2781145037 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C50522688 @default.
• W2136825748 hasConceptScore W2136825748C512399662 @default.

• next