FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2137375087> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2137375087 endingPage "336" @default.
• W2137375087 startingPage "327" @default.
• W2137375087 abstract "Background: Spouses play a major role in adaptation following the onset of their partner's aphasia. Sometimes, overprotection can occur in the relationship and this may be a disadvantage in adapting to aphasia. Overprotection from spouses can manifest itself in conversation when the spouse “speaks for” the person with aphasia and this could affect his or her participation in conversation. Aim: The aim of the present research was to study the phenomenon of overprotection, “speaking for” behaviours in conversation as well as the person with aphasia's participation in conversation. Methods & Procedures: A total of 18 couples, each including one person with aphasia, participated in this study. The perceptions of overprotection by persons with aphasia and their spouses were measured with the Overprotection Scale for Adults (Thompson & Sobolew‐Shubin, 1993 Thompson, S. C. and Sobolew‐Shubin, A. 1993. Overprotective relationships: A nonsupportive side of social networks.. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14: 363–383. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress for Families with Chronically Ill or Handicapped Members (Holroyd, 1987 Holroyd, J. 1987. Questionnaire on resources and stress for families with chronically ill or handicapped members, Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Co. [Google Scholar]). The participants were also videotaped in an interview situation where they answered questions on a systematic turn‐by‐turn basis. “Speaking for” behaviours, defined as the conversational turns in which the non‐aphasic spouse expressed an opinion or added information when the person with aphasia was clearly talking with the interviewer, were measured. Participation was measured by tabulating the number of contributive turns produced by the person with aphasia and the spouse in the nine turns following the “speaking for” behaviour. Participation of the aphasic person was considered “minor” if the number of those turns was fewer than those produced by the spouse. Outcomes & Results: Results showed that overprotection reported by spouses was positively associated with “speaking for” behaviours produced by spouses. “Speaking for” behaviours were positively related to minor participation in conversation. Aphasia severity and motor disability were also associated to minor participation of persons with aphasia in conversation. Conclusions: More research on overprotection and its effects on conversation is needed to further our understanding about the links between communication and psychosocial aspects of aphasia. In rehabilitation, attention should be given to overprotection and “speaking for” behaviours on the part of the spouse. In fact, the person with aphasia and the rehabilitation team's efforts to improve language and communication could be labour in vain if overprotection and “speaking for” behaviours on the part of the spouse develop and persist." @default.
• W2137375087 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2137375087 creator A5027122420 @default.
• W2137375087 creator A5046585577 @default.
• W2137375087 date "2006-02-01" @default.
• W2137375087 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2137375087 title "Overprotection, “speaking for”, and conversational participation: A study of couples with aphasia" @default.
• W2137375087 cites W1965244116 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W197133399 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2020001347 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2028268112 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2034439232 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2058147489 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2061932394 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2068389780 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2081028092 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2090745295 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2098346176 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2103145730 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2107038168 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2138832503 @default.
• W2137375087 cites W2323258201 @default.
• W2137375087 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500475051" @default.
• W2137375087 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2137375087 type Work @default.
• W2137375087 sameAs 2137375087 @default.
• W2137375087 citedByCount "58" @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872012 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872013 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872014 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872015 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872016 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872017 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872018 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872019 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872020 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872021 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872022 @default.
• W2137375087 countsByYear W21373750872023 @default.
• W2137375087 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2137375087 hasAuthorship W2137375087A5027122420 @default.
• W2137375087 hasAuthorship W2137375087A5046585577 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C2777495918 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C2779422653 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C138496976 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C144024400 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C15744967 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C180747234 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C19165224 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C2777200299 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C2777495918 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C2779422653 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C46312422 @default.
• W2137375087 hasConceptScore W2137375087C77805123 @default.
• W2137375087 hasIssue "2-4" @default.
• W2137375087 hasLocation W21373750871 @default.
• W2137375087 hasOpenAccess W2137375087 @default.
• W2137375087 hasPrimaryLocation W21373750871 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W1184978724 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W1492231478 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W157945816 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W1972132960 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W2017248361 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W2082781567 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W2151007406 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W2523525047 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2137375087 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2137375087 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2137375087 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2137375087 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2137375087 magId "2137375087" @default.
• W2137375087 workType "article" @default.