FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2137404704> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2137404704 abstract "Background The use of loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy represents an important issue in colorectal surgery. Despite a slight preference for a loop ileostomy as a temporary stoma, the best form for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis still remains controversial. Objectives To assess the evidence in the use of loop ileostomy compared with loop transverse colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis, comparing the safety and effectiveness. Search methods We identified randomised controlled trials from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Further, by hand‐searching relevant medical journals and proceedings from major gastroenterological congresses. We did not limit the seaches regarding date and language. Selection criteria We assessed all randomised clinical trials, that met the objectives and reported major outcomes: 1. Mortality; 2. Wound infection; 3. Time of formation of stoma; 4. Time of closure of stoma; 5. Time interval between formation and closure of stoma; 6. Stoma prolapse; 7. Stoma retraction; 8. Parastomal hernia; 9. Parastomal fistula; 10. Stenosis; 11. Necrosis; 12. Skin irritation; 13. Ileus; 14. Bowel leakage; 15. Reoperation; 16. Patient adaptation; 17. Length of hospital stay; 18. Colorectal anastomotic dehiscence; 19. Incisional hernia; 20. Postoperative bowel obstruction. Data collection and analysis Details of the randomisation, blinding, whether an intention‐to‐treat analysis was done, and the number of patients lost to follow‐up was recorded. For data analysis the relative risk and risk difference were used with corresponding 95% confidence interval; fixed effect was used for all outcomes unless incisional hernia (random effect model). Statistical heterogeneity in the results of the meta‐analysis was assessed by inspection of graphical presentation (funnel plot) and by calculating a test of heterogeneity. Main results Five trials were included with 334 patients: 168 to loop ileostomy group and 166 to loop transverse colostomy group. The continuous outcomes could not be measured because of the lack of the data. The outcomes stoma prolapse had statistical significant difference: p=0.00001, but with statistical heterogeneity, p=0,001. When the sensitive analysis was applied excluding the trials that included emergencies surgeries, the result had a discreet difference: p = 0.02 and Test for heterogeneity: chi‐square = 0.78, df = 2, p = 0.68, I2=0%. Authors' conclusions The best available evidence for decompression of colorectal anastomosis, either use of loop ileostomy or loop colostomy, could not be clarified from this review. So far, the results in terms of occurrence of postoperative stoma prolapse support the choice of loop ileostomy as a technique for fecal diversion for colorectal anastomosis, but large scale RCT's is needed to verify this." @default.
• W2137404704 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2137404704 creator A5000987872 @default.
• W2137404704 creator A5006476525 @default.
• W2137404704 creator A5045127762 @default.
• W2137404704 creator A5062944501 @default.
• W2137404704 creator A5069226179 @default.
• W2137404704 date "2007-01-24" @default.
• W2137404704 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2137404704 title "Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis" @default.
• W2137404704 cites W145060660 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W1509470174 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W1556632790 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W169342160 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W1970896993 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W1983179752 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W1994651540 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W1996734855 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2026336603 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2028842348 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2032298215 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2032349149 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2035558063 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2037286119 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2038034118 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2042438977 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2044199111 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2052164761 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2057806510 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2066256605 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2084317865 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2092682912 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2094799521 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2119826310 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2124909692 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2134067544 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2137404704 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2141257585 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2162901477 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2234410677 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2275015991 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2337711333 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2410813654 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2443687470 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2792689151 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W2921769150 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W3146215828 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W4229891720 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W4236020874 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W4240839595 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W4245655710 @default.
• W2137404704 cites W4250682241 @default.
• W2137404704 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004647.pub2" @default.
• W2137404704 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17253517" @default.
• W2137404704 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2137404704 type Work @default.
• W2137404704 sameAs 2137404704 @default.
• W2137404704 citedByCount "108" @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042012 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042013 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042014 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042015 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042016 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042017 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042018 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042019 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042020 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042021 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042022 @default.
• W2137404704 countsByYear W21374047042023 @default.
• W2137404704 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2137404704 hasAuthorship W2137404704A5000987872 @default.
• W2137404704 hasAuthorship W2137404704A5006476525 @default.
• W2137404704 hasAuthorship W2137404704A5045127762 @default.
• W2137404704 hasAuthorship W2137404704A5062944501 @default.
• W2137404704 hasAuthorship W2137404704A5069226179 @default.
• W2137404704 hasBestOaLocation W21374047042 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2777140462 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2778766689 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2778773085 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2779787475 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C2780637204 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C126322002 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C141071460 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C168563851 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C2777140462 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C2778766689 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C2778773085 @default.
• W2137404704 hasConceptScore W2137404704C2779096551 @default.

• next