FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2138093896> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2138093896 endingPage "S367" @default.
• W2138093896 startingPage "S361" @default.
• W2138093896 abstract "In Brief Study Design. Biomechanical study and the review of literature on lumbar interbody fusion constructs. Objective. To demonstrate the comparative stabilizing effects of lateral interbody fusion with various supplemental internal fixation options. Summary of Background Data. Lumbar interbody fusion procedures are regularly performed using anterior, posterior, and more recently, lateral approaches. The biomechanical profile of each is determined by the extent of resection of local supportive structures, implant size and orientation, and the type of supplemental internal fixation used. Methods. Pure moment flexibility testing was performed using a custom-built 6 degree-of-freedom system to apply a moment of ±7.5 Nm in each motion plane, while motion segment kinematics were evaluated using an optoelectronic motion system. Constructs tested included the intact spine, stand-alone extreme lateral interbody implant, interbody implant with lateral plate, unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation. These results were evaluated against those from literature-reported biomechanical studies of other lumbar interbody constructs. Results. All conditions demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in range of motion (ROM) as a percentage of intact. In flexion-extension, ROM was 31.6% stand-alone, 32.5% lateral fixation, and 20.4% and 13.0% unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation, respectively. In lateral bending, the trend was similar with greater reduction with lateral fixation than in flexion-extension; ROM was 32.5% stand-alone, 15.9% lateral fixation, and 21.6% and 14.4% unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation. ROM was greatest in axial rotation; 69.4% stand-alone, 53.4% lateral fixation, and 51.3% and 41.7% unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation, respectively. Conclusion. The extreme lateral interbody construct provided the largest stand-alone reduction in ROM compared with literature-reported ALIF and TLIF constructs. Supplemental bilateral pedicle screw-based fixation provided the overall greatest reduction in ROM, similar among all interbody approach techniques. Lateral fixation and unilateral pedicle screw fixation provided intermediate reductions in ROM. Clinically, surgeons may evaluate these comparative results to choose fixation options commensurate with the stability requirements of individual patients. Original data and a review of lumbar biomechanical studies with a focus on lateral placement of interbody implants show that the lateral implant provides more stability in stand-alone constructs than those in ALIF or TLIF. Supplementing with internal fixation results in construct stability similar to other instrumented lumbar interbody fusion techniques." @default.
• W2138093896 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5002958762 @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5008585936 @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5009697067 @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5016830139 @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5046212816 @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5061038608 @default.
• W2138093896 creator A5073518664 @default.
• W2138093896 date "2010-12-01" @default.
• W2138093896 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2138093896 title "Biomechanical Analysis and Review of Lateral Lumbar Fusion Constructs" @default.
• W2138093896 cites W1531590478 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W1975051649 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W1977940290 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W1983636332 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W1987676099 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W1992731211 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2010045028 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2014141291 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2021440128 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2024059435 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2028789444 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2035069371 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2035487908 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2039163748 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2039953706 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2044661957 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2053230003 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2056166187 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2057540280 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2059791858 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2070768011 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2081253792 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2085651257 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2085871791 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2086655810 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2087378408 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2093375963 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2094560968 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2101070887 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2110116133 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W2142799261 @default.
• W2138093896 cites W3212881526 @default.
• W2138093896 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318202308b" @default.
• W2138093896 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21160401" @default.
• W2138093896 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2138093896 type Work @default.
• W2138093896 sameAs 2138093896 @default.
• W2138093896 citedByCount "159" @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962012 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962013 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962014 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962015 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962016 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962017 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962018 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962019 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962020 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962021 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962022 @default.
• W2138093896 countsByYear W21380938962023 @default.
• W2138093896 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5002958762 @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5008585936 @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5009697067 @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5016830139 @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5046212816 @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5061038608 @default.
• W2138093896 hasAuthorship W2138093896A5073518664 @default.
• W2138093896 hasBestOaLocation W21380938961 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C39920418 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C105702510 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C121332964 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C141071460 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C146249460 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C170700871 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C2780660378 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C2781411149 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C2908647359 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C29694066 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C39920418 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C44575665 @default.
• W2138093896 hasConceptScore W2138093896C60465272 @default.

• next