FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2139189463> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2139189463 abstract "One of the most common ways that in most countries and Iran in determining the status of teacher training is the evaluation by students. The most common method of evaluation is the survey questionnaire provided to the study subjects, comprised of questions about educational activities. The researchers plan to evaluate the opinion of students and faculty members about the effect of the faculty performance evaluation at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2014-15.In this descriptive cross-sectional survey of attitudes of students and professors base their evaluation on the impact on their academic performance, have been studied. The populations were 3904 students and 149 faculty members of basic sciences Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Sample of 350 students and 107 students using Cochran formula faculty members through proportional stratified random sampling was performed. The data of the questionnaire with 28 questions on a Likert Spectrum, respectively. Statistical Analysis Data are descriptive and inferential statistics using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test is done.Based on the results obtained from total of 350 students, 309 students and from total of 107 faculty members, 76 faculty of basic sciences, participated in this study. The most of the students, 80 (25.9%) of the Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences and most of the faculty of basic sciences, 33 (4.43) of the medicine science faculty. Comments Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in comparison to the scope of the evaluation should test using Binominal test; we can conclude that in the field of regulatory, scientific, educational, and communications arena, there were no significant differences between the views of students. The greatest supporter of the education of 193 (62%) and most challengers of exam 147 (48%), respectively. Regarding the viewpoints of the faculty members at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences towards the evaluation domains, using binomial test, it could be concluded that only on the regulation domain with the significance level of 0.000, significant different was observed. So that, 30(23%) and 50(53%) supported of the effect of evaluation on the effect of evaluation of situation. Evaluation to improve the regulatory status of teachers and 70% (53 patients), the effects are positive. Students and faculty evaluations to compare the Mann-Whitney U test was used. The results show, only within the rules, with a significance level of 0.01 considered statistically significant relationship between teachers and students there.considering the viewpoints of students and faculty members about the impact of teacher performance evaluation of the students, most of the students believed that the greatest impact assessment has been on the improve educational performance entitled as responsibility of the faculty member for education, interest in presenting lessons, using audio-visual tools, having lesson plans, faculty members participate interest and enthusiasm in presenting lessons the use of teaching aids, lesson plans, faculty members participation in seminars, creating interest in students to participate in class discussions and expressing the importance of learning lessons perspective of teachers, but the faculty members viewpoints indicate the impact of evaluation on the regular attendance and discipline, the greatest impact assessment in the area of regulatory and compliance with the timely and orderly and thus their activities." @default.
• W2139189463 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2139189463 creator A5006262836 @default.
• W2139189463 creator A5008962522 @default.
• W2139189463 creator A5021517281 @default.
• W2139189463 creator A5061692519 @default.
• W2139189463 creator A5078632283 @default.
• W2139189463 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2139189463 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2139189463 title "The Opinion of Students and Faculty Members about the Effect of the Faculty Performance Evaluation" @default.
• W2139189463 cites W1515148928 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W1875814150 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W198446105 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2004245945 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2038863771 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2104143127 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2154711772 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2271217616 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2295194026 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W2600320250 @default.
• W2139189463 cites W595732397 @default.
• W2139189463 doi "https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2015.27.267-271" @default.
• W2139189463 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4610664" @default.
• W2139189463 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26543421" @default.
• W2139189463 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2139189463 type Work @default.
• W2139189463 sameAs 2139189463 @default.
• W2139189463 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2139189463 countsByYear W21391894632019 @default.
• W2139189463 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2139189463 hasAuthorship W2139189463A5006262836 @default.
• W2139189463 hasAuthorship W2139189463A5008962522 @default.
• W2139189463 hasAuthorship W2139189463A5021517281 @default.
• W2139189463 hasAuthorship W2139189463A5061692519 @default.
• W2139189463 hasAuthorship W2139189463A5078632283 @default.
• W2139189463 hasBestOaLocation W21391894632 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C139268390 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C2994003787 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C3019887784 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C139268390 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C15744967 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C17744445 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C2994003787 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C3019887784 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C39549134 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C509550671 @default.
• W2139189463 hasConceptScore W2139189463C71924100 @default.
• W2139189463 hasLocation W21391894631 @default.
• W2139189463 hasLocation W21391894632 @default.
• W2139189463 hasLocation W21391894633 @default.
• W2139189463 hasLocation W21391894634 @default.
• W2139189463 hasOpenAccess W2139189463 @default.
• W2139189463 hasPrimaryLocation W21391894631 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W1127453258 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2034058470 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2036765463 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2042289490 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2098741797 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2112964684 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2118417487 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2167246498 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2171214424 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2186417065 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2193999165 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2200014865 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2222478660 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2242807148 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2272882614 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2283538442 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2559035514 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W1512819061 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2212679422 @default.
• W2139189463 hasRelatedWork W2320228814 @default.
• W2139189463 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2139189463 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2139189463 magId "2139189463" @default.
• W2139189463 workType "article" @default.