FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2139995627> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2139995627 endingPage "1803" @default.
• W2139995627 startingPage "1795" @default.
• W2139995627 abstract "Article6 April 2006free access Adaptability of myosin V studied by simultaneous detection of position and orientation Sheyum Syed Sheyum Syed Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Search for more papers by this author Gregory E Snyder Gregory E Snyder Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Search for more papers by this author Clara Franzini-Armstrong Clara Franzini-Armstrong Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Search for more papers by this author Paul R Selvin Corresponding Author Paul R Selvin Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Search for more papers by this author Yale E Goldman Corresponding Author Yale E Goldman Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Search for more papers by this author Sheyum Syed Sheyum Syed Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Search for more papers by this author Gregory E Snyder Gregory E Snyder Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Search for more papers by this author Clara Franzini-Armstrong Clara Franzini-Armstrong Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Search for more papers by this author Paul R Selvin Corresponding Author Paul R Selvin Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA Search for more papers by this author Yale E Goldman Corresponding Author Yale E Goldman Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Sheyum Syed1,‡, Gregory E Snyder1,‡, Clara Franzini-Armstrong2,3, Paul R Selvin 1,4 and Yale E Goldman 2 1Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA 2Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 4Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA ‡These authors contributed equally to this work *Corresponding authors: Loomis Lab of Physics, University of Illinois, 1110 W. Green St, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Tel.: +1 217 244 3371; Fax: +1 217 244 7559; E-mail: [email protected] Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, D700 Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6083, USA. Tel.: +1 215 898 4017; Fax: +1 215 898 2653; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2006)25:1795-1803https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601060 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info We studied the structural dynamics of chicken myosin V by combining the localization power of fluorescent imaging with one nanometer accuracy (FIONA) with the ability to detect angular changes of a fluorescent probe. The myosin V was labeled with bifunctional rhodamine on one of its calmodulin light chains. For every 74 nm translocation, the probe exhibited two reorientational motions, associated with alternating smaller and larger translational steps. Molecules previously identified as stepping alternatively 74-0 nm were found to actually step 64-10 nm. Additional tilting often occurred without full steps, possibly indicating flexibility of the attached myosin heads or probing of their vicinity. Processive myosin V molecules sometimes shifted from the top to the side of actin, possibly to avoid an obstacle. The data indicate marked adaptability of this molecular motor to a nonuniform local environment and provide strong support for a straight-neck model of myosin V in which the lever arm of the leading head is tilted backwards at the prepowerstoke angle. Introduction Myosin V is a two-headed motor protein responsible for actin-based intracellular transport and positioning of certain membrane bound vesicles, endoplasmic reticulum and mRNA-containing particles (Reck-Peterson et al, 2000; Vale, 2003). Recent technical advances in single-molecule biophysics have revealed various details about the mechanism of myosin V's activity. Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy showed that myosin V is processive (exhibits dozens of mechanical steps before detaching from actin, Sakamoto et al, 2000) and optical trap experiments indicated that the molecule takes ∼37 nm strides toward the barbed end of actin (Mehta et al, 1999; Rief et al, 2000). More recent optical trap studies have shown that the 37-nm displacement is composed of an active stroke that is only ∼20–25 nm (Moore et al, 2001; Veigel et al, 2002); the remainder of the stride is presumably due to a thermally driven search for an appropriately oriented actin-binding site. Polarized TIRF microscopy of myosin V molecules labeled on their calmodulin (CaM) light chains detected tilting of the molecule's neck region on each step (Forkey et al, 2003), as expected if the light chain domain serves as a mechanical lever arm. Fluorescence imaging at one nanometer accuracy (FIONA) showed that the two heads step ‘hand-over-hand’ to maintain association with actin during processive motility (Yildiz et al, 2003; Snyder et al, 2004). The trailing head is thought to translate 74 nm (twice the stride length) to become the leading head at the completion of each step (Yildiz et al, 2003; Churchman et al, 2005; Warshaw et al, 2005). In the polarized TIRF and FIONA experiments, several populations of myosin V molecules were detected, presumably differing on which of the six light chain subunits on one of the heads was labeled with the fluorophore. In the FIONA study, alternating step distances of 52-23-52…, 42-33-42…, or 74-0-74… nm characterized each individual molecule. In some cases, the string of alternating distances was broken by a step with an unexpected value and then the alternating pattern would resume. In the polarized TIRF microscopy study, almost half of the molecules that were translocating did not seem to tilt whereas the other half tilted through a sufficient angular range (taking angular ambiguities in the experimental measurement into account) to explain the 37 nm stride length. These observations led us to consider the two models for the structural configuration of the heads drawn in Figure 1. In the ‘straight-neck’ model, the pivot for tilting of the CaM neck domain is between the CaM molecules and actin, that is within the motor domain, so that no major structural rearrangement takes place within the neck itself when the corresponding head makes a step. In this model, alternating large and small steps are expected and no 74-0-74-type molecules should arise, regardless of the particular CaM labeling site. Every CaM subunit should tilt on each step, again regardless of labeling position. In the ‘bent-neck’ model (Figure 1B), the CaM nearest the motor domain is tilted toward the barbed end in both leading and trailing positions, and the structural changes (e.g., a strong kink) are farther from actin than the first light chain. This model predicts that 74-0-74-type molecules will not exhibit fluorophore tilting if the label is on a CaM situated below the kink (towards actin). The nontilting molecules in the polarized TIRF experiments were therefore grouped under the ‘bent-neck’ model. Recent experiments with myosin V with eGFP on the head (Snyder et al, 2004), combined with the observations of Yildiz et al (2003) also led to speculation of a bend between the first and second light chains on the lever arm. Electron micrographs showed some myosin V molecules bound to actin with leading heads bent forward (Walker et al, 2000). Later detailed studies, however, showed that configurations with sharply bent CaM domains are rare, and that the majority of leading heads have their CaMs and the C-terminal region of their motor domains (the converter domains) tilted backward at the prepower-stroke position (Burgess et al, 2002), as in the ‘straight-neck’ model. Figure 1.Cartoons illustrating (A) the straight-neck and (B) the bent-neck or telemark-skier models. According to this simple picture, the straight-neck model requires the fluorescent probe (blue oval) on calmodulin (i) to move a distance >0 and <74 nm every time the stalk moves 37 nm and (ii) to alter its orientation between some angle λ1 and another λ2 at each step. Therefore, every step must be accompanied by change in intensities of polarized fluorescence (I0, right side). In contrast, the bent-neck model predicts that when the labeled CaM is below the bend (i) the stepping pattern is 74-0 and (ii) no large variations occur in I0 since the probe orientation does not change upon a step. Download figure Download PowerPoint Myosin V has been identified as a transport motor and/or tether for pigmented granules in mammalian melanocytes (Reck-Peterson et al, 2000) and amphibian melanophores (Rogers and Gelfand, 1998). It positions smooth endoplasmic reticulum in squid axoplasm (Tabb et al, 1998) and in dendridic spines of mouse brain Purkinje cells (Dekker-Ohno et al, 1996). In yeast, one myosin V, Myo2p, is involved in moving vacuolar and secretory vesicles while another, Myo4p, transports mRNA from mother to bud during cell division (Bertrand et al, 1998; Reck-Peterson et al, 2000). There is evidence that the yeast myosin V isoforms are nonprocessive (Reck-Peterson et al, 2001). Each of these roles requires specificity of cargo interaction and defined localization in a crowded in vivo environment. Although vesicles are transported over long distances along both microtubule and actin cytoskeletal filaments (Al-Haddad et al, 2001; Gross et al, 2002; Rodionov et al, 2003), the number of myosin V molecules actively transporting an individual vesicle within the cell may be as few as one or two in some instances (Snider et al, 2004). To transport a cargo to a specified region in the cell with various obstacles densely placed in its path (Heuser and Kirschner, 1980; Medalia et al, 2002), myosin V needs to display strongly processive motility but still maintain flexibility. It presumably has to alter its course along a filament, to switch to other filaments, and to function in cooperation with other cytoplasmic and vesicular transport proteins (Brown, 1999; Mallik and Gross, 2004). The complex milieu and behavior suggest that myosin V should possess multiple mechanisms that allow coordination not only between its two actin-binding heads but also with its surroundings. Several biochemical, mechanical and structural experiments have elucidated details about head-to-head coordination. These studies have suggested that in double-headed attachment complexes with actin, intramolecular strain modulates the kinetics to maintain the mechano-chemical cycles of the heads out of synchrony so that both do not detach at the same time (De La Cruz et al, 1999; Baker et al, 2004; Coureux et al, 2004; Rosenfeld and Sweeney, 2004; Uemura et al, 2004; Veigel et al, 2005; Vilfan, 2005). Less is known about myosin V's interaction with components in its environment and its ability to adjust its path and negotiate through the complex and crowded cellular territory. Each myosin V molecule is a dimer of two N-terminal globular ‘heads’, two light chain domains, an α-helical coiled-coil, and a C-terminal domain that interacts with the cargo. The head binds actin, hydrolyzes ATP, and generates motion. The light chain domain or so-called ‘lever arm’ has six consensus ‘IQ motifs’ that, in chicken brain myosin V, probably bind an essential light chain (ELC) in position 1 (numbering from the motor domain) and one additional ELC and four CaM subunits in positions 2–5 (De La Cruz et al, 2000; Espindola et al, 2000; Terrak et al, 2005). To establish a direct relationship between tilting and stepping of the CaMs and thus resolve whether the neck regions of actively translocating myosin V molecules bend, and to determine whether they play any role in adjusting the molecule's path along actin, it is necessary to measure nm-resolved translation and tilting simultaneously. Using the combined polarized TIRF and FIONA technique described here, we have simultaneously monitored the orientational and translational motions of individual fluorescent probes and studied the motions of bifunctional rhodamine (BR) rigidly attached to a CaM in the neck region of myosin V. The results strongly favor the ‘straight-neck’ model (Figure 1A) and reveal various unexpected modes of motion that depart from the strict hand-over-hand alternating steps. These variations reveal new mechanisms that may enable myosin V to negotiate flexibly within its inhomogeneous environment and perform as an efficient intracellular transporter. Results and discussion Alternating steps and tilts BR probes were attached at low stoichiometry to a CaM subunit on a whole myosin V, isolated from chicken brains. The two reactive groups of the dye rigidly attach it to the CaM, limiting its rotation relative to the protein. The orientation of the dye therefore reflects the orientation of the CaM. The labeled myosin V processively translocated along actin attached to the microscope slide surface at 150 or 500 nM ATP. Recordings of active myosin V were obtained in a prism-type TIRF microscope (see Materials and methods). The sample was illuminated in successive frames by an evanescent wave switched every 150 or 500 ms (depending on the [ATP]) between beams propagating in the laboratory x–z and y–z planes (z is the microscope optical axis) and with polarizations along the y- and x-axis, respectively (see Materials and methods for details). A CCD camera triggered the beam switching shutters and captured images of the rhodamine fluorescence. Following previous FIONA experiments (Yildiz et al, 2003; Snyder et al, 2004), images of individual fluorophores acquired in each CCD frame were fit with a two-dimensional Gaussian function to determine the position and emission intensity of the probe (see Supplementary Figure S2 and the accompanying text). The center of the Gaussian function fit to each image was marked as the probe position and the height of the fit above the background signal as its peak intensity, I0. Figure 2A shows the position and intensity data of a BR-labeled myosin V translocating at 9.6 nm/s at [ATP]=150 nM. Data taken with excitations along x- and y-axis are shown in green and red symbols, respectively. Since the probe is excited with polarized beams, its fluorescence intensity depends on its orientation relative to the incident polarization. In Figure 2A, every step taken by the myosin V is associated with a large change of the normalized peak intensity, I0/I0Max, in one or both channels. The intensity variations are not due to blinking of the fluorophore since they are strongly correlated with the stepping of myosin V (dashed lines), and they often entail complementary changes in both intensity channels. Instead, the variations indicate tilting of the BR probe when the motor protein walks along actin. The anticorrelated two- to four-fold modulation in I0 suggests that the probe reorientations are mainly in the x–y plane with the motor walking along the side of the filament, which was aligned at 20° to the x-axis. Since the BR is tightly bound to the lever arm, the intensity changes indicate orientational changes of the labeled lever arm. Figure 2.(A) Position (◊) and intensity (•) data of a myosin V tagged with a BR dye on one lever arm and measured with two polarized beams directed along the x- (green symbols) and y-axis (red symbols). I0Max is the maximum fluorescence intensity excited by the individual beams. The solid line is an intensity-weighted fit through the position data. Dashed vertical lines highlight the strong correlation between translational steps taken by the labeled lever arm and its orientational changes. In this case, the angular change occurs mostly in the x–y plane. (B) Another myosin molecule with BR bound to a different site on the neck. Positional and angular changes are again highly correlated. The probe tilts primarily in the x–z plane with the molecule walking along the x direction. The symbol key in (A) applies to both data sets. Download figure Download PowerPoint Due to the tilting motions and the polarized illumination, two consecutive I0 values can be quite different (e.g., between 8 and 14 s). As a result, the precision in determining the probe's position, which depends on the number of photons collected (Yildiz et al, 2003), can vary between consecutive CCD frames (also see Supplementary Figure S2). In order to correctly account for the different precisions, the mean position within a period between transitions is determined by a weighted-average, where ri denotes the position and I0i the corresponding intensities. The errors on the mean dwell positions in this trace, taking the weighting into account (Bevington, 1969), are <±2.5 nm. The solid staircases plotted in the figures are the intensity-weighted fits to the position data from both polarizations, yielding the indicated steps alternately averaging 49±3 and 25±3 nm in Figure 2A. These values are consistent with CaM labeling of the myosin on the fourth IQ position from the motor domain. The motor protein executes eight steps ‘hand-over-hand’ in ∼30 s, covering a distance of 293 nm. No significant bias in the apparent position is associated with alternations of the excitation polarization in this example. Data from another molecule, shown in Figure 2B, exhibit 43-30-type stepping and correlated intensity variations mainly for the signal from y-directed excitation. This behavior is most compatible with BR-CaM labeling at the fifth or sixth light chain position, and probe tilting mainly in the x–z plane. The actin in this example lays parallel to the x-axis. We now return to the issue of ‘straight-neck’ versus ‘bent-neck’ models. Figure 3 shows four separate myosin V molecules with larger and smaller steps at [ATP]=150 nM (Figure 3A and B) and 500 nM (Figure 3C and D). Using the large intensity variations (dashed lines) as timing marks to identify steps shows that each rotation of the probe is associated with a step, alternating between 63±2 and 10±1 nm in panels A and B, and 65±3 and 12±2 nm in panels C and D. In the analysis used for our previous studies (Yildiz et al, 2003), the stepping pattern of these motors would be categorized as the 74-0 type. However, when the present simultaneously recorded polarized intensity data are used to mark transitions, the intensity-weighted average positions before and after each mark show that they are associated with steps. The accompanying probe reorientations implicate lever arm tilting and enhance the possibility of identifying the small steps. Figure 3.Position (*) and intensity (⧫) data at 150 nM ATP (A, B) and 500 nM ATP (C, D). Data in (A) and (B) are acquired every 0.5 s while that in (C) and (D) are taken every 0.15 s. The traces demonstrate that ‘74’ nm steps observed previously with myosin V are actually composed of 64 and 10 nm steps. The large and small steps are marked next to the position traces. Although at low [ATP], the small steps can be usually identified from the position records alone, reliance on the polarization data becomes more critical at the higher [ATP] in (C) and (D). The records in (C) and (D) have been truncated for clarity. Dashed vertical lines mark the intensity changes that coincide with steps. The processivity directions for panels (A–D) are approximately 135°, 290°, 90°, and 0°, respectively, measured clockwise with respect to the microscope x-axis. Download figure Download PowerPoint We have examined 68 such large and small steps that yielded overall mean values of 64.3±0.7 and 11.7±1 nm (±s.e.m.), respectively. In >90% of cases, both the ∼64 nm steps and the ∼10 nm steps in this category were statistically significant (P<0.01). As shown in Figure 1A, the larger of the two alternating step distances corresponds to a movement of the trailing head to the leading position. Thus, we identify the previously undetected small steps as displacements of the leading (nonstepping) lever arm when the (unlabeled) trailing head swings forward. The present data therefore show that the previously categorized 74-0 molecules actually follow a 64-10 stepping pattern. Moreover, application of a hidden Markov model to myosin V FIONA data acquired with unpolarized excitation also confirms that the alternating steps are indeed 64 and 10 nm (Dr Fred Sigworth, private communication). These molecules are likely to have the label in one of the two CaM positions closest to the motor domain. It should be pointed out that the sketch in Figure 1 is a simplified picture of processivity, showing the motor's configuration only in its state dwelling with both heads bound to actin. The time resolution of our experiments blurs out events faster than ∼200 ms, such as the multiple directed and diffusional motions that presumably take place during a step (Veigel et al, 2002; Spudich and Rock, 2002). Therefore, conformational changes of the lever arm that persist for <200 ms are not reported by our measurements. For ∼200 individual myosin V molecules studied here, three major populations of stepping pattern: 44-30, 50-25, and 64-10 were evident, presumably corresponding to different labeled CaM positions. Assuming a straight lever arm 25 nm long, with six light chains (3.6 nm each) plus a 3 nm rotating converter domain, the expected stepping for a molecule tagged on the sixth, fourth and second CaM are 40-34, 51-23, and 61-13, very close to the three observed patterns. Each of the observed populations may also be a mixture of two subpopulations of myosin V labeled on adjacent sites. Since the exact probe position is not known for each molecule, the bent-neck model with a kink between the first and second light chains is formally possible, if IQ position one is never exchanged. In that case, however, to span 36 nm, the part of the lever arm beyond the kink (⩽5 × 3.6 nm=18 nm) would lie almost parallel to the actin filament—an unlikely position. Thus, the lack of molecules with truly 0 nm steps and the observation that the lever arm reorients at virtually every step strongly support the ‘straight-neck’ model for chicken myosin V, as shown in Figure 1A. This conclusion agrees with that from single particle electron micrographic image processing studies on mouse myosin V (Burgess et al, 2002). Departures from strict hand-over-hand alternation Azimuthal shift around actin. The recordings presented so far were clearly categorized into regularly alternating classes, such as 50-24, and represented probe reorientations mostly in one of three planes: x–y, x–z or y–z. Some motility records, however, show departures from both these traits. They display two or more sequential ⩾20 nm steps whose sizes lie outside the alternating pattern and whose polarizations imply a shift between two different planes. The molecular motor that produced Figure 4A was labeled on the first or second CaM, judging by the stepping patterns at the beginning and end of the trace. Polarized excitation beams sometimes produce low fluorescence in one channel giving rise to increased noise and, occasionally, an apparent shift in the probe position. However, the intensity-weighted averaging procedure mentioned above guides the fit (solid line) through the data points with highest accuracy (largest numbers of photons) and allows determination of the position, 〈r〉w, to within ±4 nm. The motility starts with lever arm orientations largely in the x–z plane, as indicated by the direct correlation of the two intensity traces and the larger deflection of the beam propagating along the y-axis (red). At ∼10 s, the intensity traces suddenly become anticorrelated and the deflections in the other trace (green) increase, indicating that the orientation switched toward the x–y plane. Figure 4.Records at 500 nM ATP showing how simultaneous position and polarization information reveals myosin V moving from top to side of a actin filaments. Both molecules are 64-10 nm steppers but while the molecule in (A) swings right at ∼18 s, that in (B) turns left around actin at ∼52 s. Some steps are left unmarked for clarity. A sideways transition of the myosin leads to a jumbled stepping pattern and altered relative changes in fluorescent intensity (see text). After the transition is complete, the apparent step size returns but the position data has moved from one set of grid lines (solid) to another (dashed) that are shifted by 20 nm. Occasionally, probe localization experienced systematic error due to low fluorescence intensity with alternating input polarizations, displacing the position data (A). (C) Differences in (i) the layout of the actin binding sites and (ii) patterns of probe reorientations, for a myosin walking on top versus on the side of actin. The binding sites for the motor domains are 36 nm apart both on top (blue monomers) and on the side (red monomers) of actin. But owing to the helical structure of actin, the blue and red lattices are shifted relatively by four actin monomers, corresponding to 22 nm. A shift of three monomers of the binding sites, or 16.5 nm, is consistent with our data as well. After the myosin makes a right azimuthal turn around actin, the position data jumps from one lattice to the other undergoing a shift of ∼20 nm. The actin in (A) is aligned at 330° and that in (B) at 280°, with the x-axis. If the actin is laid along the x-axis (A), then the probe tilts largely in the x–z plane while the motor walks on top of actin but switches to an x–y tilting when the molecule makes the transition to the side. Download figure Download PowerPoint The 56-40-50 nm steps between 12 and 22 s do not fit into the usual alternating large and small pattern (64-10-64…). As shown in the previous figures, alternating large and small steps are expected for a myosin walking in a fixed plane. But if the motor were to rotate 90° to the right around actin in this interval (viewed along actin toward the barbed end), then an extra 18 nm (half of the crossover length of actin) of stepping distance would be expected. In the cartoon in Figure 4C, left panel, it would mean a transition from the array of blue actin binding sites (marked by solid lines) to the array of red sites (marked by dashed lines), displaced by four actin monomers or ∼22 nm, due to the helical structure of actin. Indeed, an overlay of two 74 nm grids in Figure 4A shifted by 20 nm (solid and dashed lines) shows that the molecule overstepped by approximately this amount near 18 s. The normal step sizes are eventually re-established after the changeover, suggesting that the molecule walks relatively straight after it changes planes. The dye's polarization pattern, however, remains anticorrelated (in x–y plane) as expected from Figure 4C (right panel) for a motor that continues to walk on the side of actin. The motor in Figure 3D briefly shows similar deviation from its usual stepping behavior between 12 and 17 s with corresponding intensities changing from anticorrelated modulation (t<10 s) to correlated variations (15 s<t<22 s). The switch of the intensity pattern from anti- to directly correlated modulations signals the myosin's transition from the side to the top of the actin. Figure 4B shows another example of a myosin V making a transition from the top of actin to one side. However, in this case, the transition is to the left, as evidenced by a shift of the motor's position data from the solid grid to the dashed grid set back by 20 nm. The sudden switch of BR probe's tilting at ∼52 s from the y–z plane to the x–y plane further corroborates rotation of the myosin around its substrate. In contrast to our results, experiments on the motion of unconstrained myosin V have shown that the motor cargo typically traces a left-handed spiral (Ali et al, 2002) and that actin propelled in a gliding assay by myosin V also twirls leftward with a long pitch (Beausang et al, 2006). Our data, showing examples of left- and right-handed azimuthal swings, demonstrate adaptability of the protein during translocation. The abruptness of this motion, rather than along a smooth helical route, suggests that it may occur on an encounter with an obstacle in its preferred path. ‘Extra’ reorientations. Some recordings of myosin V orientation showed clear rotational motions that were not associated with normal translational steps. We call these reorientation events ‘extra’ since they were detected in addition to the expected lever arm motions that produced alternating 44-30, 50-25, or 64-10 nm types of stepping. For example, in Figure 5A, translational steps of 24, 48, and 26 nm suggest this molecule to be of the 50-25 type. All three steps are signaled by changes in the intensity signals (vertical lines). In addition, the probe unexpectedly reorients around 6 and 16 s (vertical arrows). Figure 5 is a gallery of traces containing such unexpected orientation changes. In each case, typical alternating steps with correlated tilting are marked by dashed vertical lines. Extra realignments of the lever arm are marked by vertical arro" @default.
• W2139995627 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2139995627 creator A5013832205 @default.
• W2139995627 creator A5034394771 @default.
• W2139995627 creator A5045925125 @default.
• W2139995627 creator A5051614870 @default.
• W2139995627 creator A5073719511 @default.
• W2139995627 date "2006-04-06" @default.
• W2139995627 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2139995627 title "Adaptability of myosin V studied by simultaneous detection of position and orientation" @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1497145732 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1520255714 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1541577839 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1593010471 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1934663712 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1964533978 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1968266458 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1978243335 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1980676208 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1993109344 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1994797453 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W1995035844 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2001758775 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2015404233 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2015736489 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2022332311 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2025039463 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2025042015 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2027321010 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2030267692 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2034725792 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2052657219 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2055665417 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2055870007 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2064286990 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2074813312 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2089880432 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2092405548 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2096526911 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2098558657 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2120060428 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2126850824 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2127540003 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2134178640 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2135358447 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2139572033 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2143435641 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2164296045 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2166803246 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2169993591 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W2170296662 @default.
• W2139995627 cites W952792670 @default.
• W2139995627 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601060" @default.
• W2139995627 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1456946" @default.
• W2139995627 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16601691" @default.
• W2139995627 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2139995627 type Work @default.
• W2139995627 sameAs 2139995627 @default.
• W2139995627 citedByCount "63" @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272012 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272013 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272014 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272015 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272017 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272018 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272020 @default.
• W2139995627 countsByYear W21399956272022 @default.
• W2139995627 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2139995627 hasAuthorship W2139995627A5013832205 @default.
• W2139995627 hasAuthorship W2139995627A5034394771 @default.
• W2139995627 hasAuthorship W2139995627A5045925125 @default.
• W2139995627 hasAuthorship W2139995627A5051614870 @default.
• W2139995627 hasAuthorship W2139995627A5073719511 @default.
• W2139995627 hasBestOaLocation W21399956272 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C153911025 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C16345878 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C198082294 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C6997183 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C10138342 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C12554922 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C153911025 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C162324750 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C16345878 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C198082294 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C2524010 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C33923547 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C6997183 @default.
• W2139995627 hasConceptScore W2139995627C86803240 @default.
• W2139995627 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2139995627 hasLocation W21399956271 @default.
• W2139995627 hasLocation W21399956272 @default.
• W2139995627 hasLocation W21399956273 @default.

• next