FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2141819269> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2141819269 endingPage "194" @default.
• W2141819269 startingPage "194" @default.
• W2141819269 abstract "The problemWe would all like to believe that the best possible evidence informs health policy. Unfortunately, the translation of evidence into policy is not a simple process. Numerous factors influence policy development because decision making is an inherently social process, not just a technical exercise. Expert opinion, political sensitivities, organisational constraints, primary re- search and systematic reviews may all contribute to a given decision, but the priority accorded some elements over others rests well outside the bounds of a researcher's influence.1 Even more sobering is the fact that the importance of evidence in the policy-development process may erode over time.2The good news is that the Australian government wants to improve the quality of policy, and a 2010 document entitled Ahead of the Game: Blueprint for the Reform of Australian Government Administration expressly directed public servants to establish or reinvigorate partnerships with academia and research.3 Moreover, in 2011, 21 Australian Public Service department heads endorsed the call for public servants to employ 'the most up-to-date thinking and approaches' and to 'more effectively use the innovative capacity of a much broader base.'4 At both the national and state levels, health departments have been trying to improve exchange at the research-policy interface for some time. The Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing established the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, at the Australian National University, in 2003 (www. anu.edu.au/aphcri/)5 and in 2011 it created a knowledge-broker- age position located at Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, which is currently held by one of the authors (PMcI). Similarly, the Sax Institute (www.saxinstitute.org.au) was creat- ed with core funding from NSW Health, and operates a knowl- edge-brokerage service that has completed 87 evidence checks since 2005. Furthermore, National Health and Medical Research Council funding has been provided to establish the Centre for Informing Policy in Health with Evidence from Research (http:// acc .cochrane. org/cipher).Australian governments are clearly expressing a desire to improve the research-policy interface through promotion of partnerships and increased interaction between researchers and policy makers. However, any health researcher keen to seize this opportunity is likely to face two problems: the apparent cultural differences between knowledge producers and users, and the rapid cycling of individuals through various positions within health departments.The former problem can be explained by the 'two commu- nities' theory, which posits that the producers and users of knowledge 'live in separate worlds with different and often conflicting values, different reward systems, and different languages. '6 Research into the attitudes of upper-level executives in the US government provided the empirical base for this theory. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the difference between users and non-users of data external to government departments was explained by the cultural gap between government officials and social scientists, rather than the specific knowledge required for a given policy problem or by the real or imagined constraints of working within a bureaucratic system.The 'broken link' phenomenon arises when a research pro- ducer establishes a good working relationship with a potential research user, only to have that individual move to another position and be replaced by someone with little or no content knowledge. The regular movement of departmental staff between positions is a deeply embedded cultural phenomenon, which can be traced back to the 1976 Royal Commission on Australian Government Administration .7 The review recommended, among other things, that public servants move across areas and depart- ments to break down the silos that had developed.7 The movement among multiple roles, departments and areas continues today and is promoted at the highest level with the notion of a single leadership cadre across the Australian Public Service, as expressed in One APS - One SES. …" @default.
• W2141819269 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2141819269 creator A5006646425 @default.
• W2141819269 creator A5037004532 @default.
• W2141819269 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2141819269 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2141819269 title "Increasing the influence of one’s research on policy" @default.
• W2141819269 cites W1966808014 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W1971021278 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W1971123156 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W1984526196 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W1984931245 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2004541993 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2021911961 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2031824498 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2064326687 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2073686662 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2092085802 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2107299871 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2108306701 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2110213970 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2118545212 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2141483033 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2157547678 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2159579686 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2166227248 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2239085877 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2318585304 @default.
• W2141819269 cites W2884717625 @default.
• W2141819269 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah12158" @default.
• W2141819269 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23490025" @default.
• W2141819269 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2141819269 type Work @default.
• W2141819269 sameAs 2141819269 @default.
• W2141819269 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2141819269 countsByYear W21418192692013 @default.
• W2141819269 countsByYear W21418192692014 @default.
• W2141819269 countsByYear W21418192692017 @default.
• W2141819269 countsByYear W21418192692018 @default.
• W2141819269 countsByYear W21418192692022 @default.
• W2141819269 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2141819269 hasAuthorship W2141819269A5006646425 @default.
• W2141819269 hasAuthorship W2141819269A5037004532 @default.
• W2141819269 hasBestOaLocation W21418192691 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C2778149918 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C3018439406 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C47344431 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C524218345 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C100001284 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C138816342 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C138885662 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C159110408 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C162324750 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C2778137410 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C2778149918 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C3018439406 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C41895202 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C47344431 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C524218345 @default.
• W2141819269 hasConceptScore W2141819269C71924100 @default.
• W2141819269 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2141819269 hasLocation W21418192691 @default.
• W2141819269 hasLocation W21418192692 @default.
• W2141819269 hasLocation W21418192693 @default.
• W2141819269 hasOpenAccess W2141819269 @default.
• W2141819269 hasPrimaryLocation W21418192691 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2000923785 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2062976274 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2119386635 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2139483147 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2158040199 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2297366232 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2410571614 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2470373670 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W2948422632 @default.
• W2141819269 hasRelatedWork W3110162592 @default.
• W2141819269 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W2141819269 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2141819269 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2141819269 magId "2141819269" @default.
• W2141819269 workType "article" @default.