FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2141827797> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2141827797 endingPage "520" @default.
• W2141827797 startingPage "512" @default.
• W2141827797 abstract "Background: Three different techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction—conventional (transtibial) single bundle (CSB), anatomic single bundle (ASB), and anatomic double bundle (ADB)—have been described. Purpose: To determine if double-bundle reconstruction is needed to restore rotational stability or if anatomic placement of a single bundle can yield similar results. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: From December 2005 to December 2007, 320 patients were prospectively randomized into 3 groups: ADB, ASB, and CSB reconstruction. The average follow-up was 51.15 months (range, 39-63 months). At the final follow-up, 281 patients were available. In all groups, hamstring tendons were used with suspensory fixation on the femoral side and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation on the tibial side. The outcomes were evaluated by an independent blinded observer using the Lysholm score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. The KT-1000 arthrometer was used to evaluate anteroposterior stability, and the pivot-shift test was used to determine rotational stability. Results: Anatomic single-bundle reconstruction resulted in better anteroposterior and rotational stability than CSB reconstruction (average side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation was 1.6 mm in the ASB group vs 2.0 mm in the CSB group; P = .002). Negative pivot shift was 66.7% vs 41.7% ( P = .003). In other parameters, the differences between groups were not statistically significant. The results of the ADB group were also superior to the ASB group for anteroposterior and rotational stability (average side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation was 1.2 mm in the ADB group vs 1.6 mm in the ASB group; P = .002). Negative pivot shift was 93.1% vs 66.7%, respectively ( P < .001), and range of motion was also significantly different ( P = .005). The Lysholm score was 90.9, 91.8, and 93.0 in the CSB, ASB, and ADB groups, respectively. The difference was significant only when we compared ADB and CSB ( P = .025). Subjective IKDC scores were 90.2, 90.6, and 92.1 in the CSB, ASB, and ADB groups, respectively. The difference was not significant. Conclusion: Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction is significantly superior to conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction and better than anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Anatomic single-bundle reconstruction was superior to conventional single-bundle reconstruction. However, these differences are small and may not be clinically relevant." @default.
• W2141827797 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2141827797 creator A5017033328 @default.
• W2141827797 creator A5049912939 @default.
• W2141827797 creator A5075634463 @default.
• W2141827797 creator A5078679339 @default.
• W2141827797 creator A5091321388 @default.
• W2141827797 date "2011-11-15" @default.
• W2141827797 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2141827797 title "Prospective Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Single-Bundle, Anatomic Single-Bundle, and Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction" @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1971713335 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1971912981 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1974517876 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1992642137 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1995445209 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1995678389 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W1999575750 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2006965376 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2018067917 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2030325791 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2039705584 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2043776778 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2046362994 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2058552924 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2064437020 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2071207300 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2075623344 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2078213711 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2078327597 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2086038263 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2088873954 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2088946530 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2096996722 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2097904138 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2104229316 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2108603217 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2111102938 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2112877966 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2113663568 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2115250707 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2117878938 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2132106136 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2132384485 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W213962456 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2143199738 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2152971665 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2153378360 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2153829712 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2167101807 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2170704254 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2171143740 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2275980081 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W2311677952 @default.
• W2141827797 cites W3127609642 @default.
• W2141827797 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511426416" @default.
• W2141827797 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22085729" @default.
• W2141827797 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2141827797 type Work @default.
• W2141827797 sameAs 2141827797 @default.
• W2141827797 citedByCount "292" @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972012 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972013 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972014 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972015 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972016 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972017 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972018 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972019 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972020 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972021 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972022 @default.
• W2141827797 countsByYear W21418277972023 @default.
• W2141827797 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2141827797 hasAuthorship W2141827797A5017033328 @default.
• W2141827797 hasAuthorship W2141827797A5049912939 @default.
• W2141827797 hasAuthorship W2141827797A5075634463 @default.
• W2141827797 hasAuthorship W2141827797A5078679339 @default.
• W2141827797 hasAuthorship W2141827797A5091321388 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C2776141760 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C2777383355 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C141071460 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C146249460 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C2776141760 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C2777383355 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C2778434673 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C2780887989 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C2908647359 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C29694066 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C71924100 @default.
• W2141827797 hasConceptScore W2141827797C99454951 @default.

• next