FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2142247257> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2142247257 endingPage "0" @default.
• W2142247257 startingPage "81" @default.
• W2142247257 abstract "To determine the cost effectiveness of intensive follow up compared with conventional follow up in patients with colorectal cancer.Incremental cost effectiveness analysis recognising differences in follow up strategies, based on effectiveness data from a meta-analysis of five randomised trials.United Kingdom.Taking a health service perspective, estimated incremental costs effectiveness ratios for each life year gained for five trials and four trials designed for early detection of extramural recurrences (targeted surveillance).Based on five year follow up, the numbers of life years gained by intensive follow up were 0.73 for the five trial model and 0.82 for the four trial model. For the five trials, the adjusted net (extra) cost for each patient was 2479 pounds sterling (3550 euros; 4288 dollars) and for each life year gained was 3402 pounds sterling, substantially lower than the current threshold of NHS cost acceptability (30 000 pounds sterling). The corresponding values for the four trial model were 2529 pounds sterling and 3077 pounds sterling, suggesting that targeted surveillance is more cost effective. The main predictor of incremental cost effectiveness ratios was surveillance costs rather than treatment costs. Judged against the NHS threshold of cost acceptability, the predicted incremental cost threshold was ninefold and the effectiveness threshold was 3%.Based on the available data and current costs, intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer is economically justified and should be normal practice. There is a continuing need to evaluate the efficacy of specific surveillance tools: this study forms the basis for economic evaluations in such trials." @default.
• W2142247257 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2142247257 creator A5016625039 @default.
• W2142247257 date "2004-01-10" @default.
• W2142247257 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2142247257 title "Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer" @default.
• W2142247257 cites W193143897 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W1967898314 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W1970702320 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W1975076018 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W1975638353 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W1987136618 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W1993257690 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2000163133 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2011083424 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2014022092 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2020919119 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2023338191 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2025210971 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2025244049 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2025600640 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2041688734 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2108318973 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2127856420 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2129007528 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2140905749 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2150339343 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2151640687 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2158443103 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2168802143 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2170723766 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2400040525 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2410888620 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W275110452 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2790149518 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W2919276782 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W4239681214 @default.
• W2142247257 cites W79871703 @default.
• W2142247257 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7431.81" @default.
• W2142247257 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/314047" @default.
• W2142247257 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14715603" @default.
• W2142247257 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2142247257 type Work @default.
• W2142247257 sameAs 2142247257 @default.
• W2142247257 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572012 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572013 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572014 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572016 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572017 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572018 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572019 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572020 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572021 @default.
• W2142247257 countsByYear W21422472572022 @default.
• W2142247257 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2142247257 hasAuthorship W2142247257A5016625039 @default.
• W2142247257 hasBestOaLocation W21422472571 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C15716912 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C2778097690 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C2779900020 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C515549039 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C66887028 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C112930515 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C121608353 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C126322002 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C127454912 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C138885662 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C141071460 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C142724271 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C15708023 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C15716912 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C162324750 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C168563851 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C175444787 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C18903297 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C2776125615 @default.
• W2142247257 hasConceptScore W2142247257C2778097690 @default.

• next