FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2142952172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2142952172 endingPage "22" @default.
• W2142952172 startingPage "11" @default.
• W2142952172 abstract "Over the past few years, certification schemes in the agribusiness sector have gained great im-portance as an instrument of quality assurance in the supply chain (Jahn et al. 2005; Fulponi2006; European Communities 2006a). Especially in the EU several standards have been esta-blished, which partially diverge extremely according to their focus, target groups and goals.While most of these systems have a rather low diffusion in the food sector (e. g. Label Rougeor Geprufte Qualitat Bayern), ce rtification schemes such as QS, BRC, IFS or EurepGap alreadycover substantial parts and are widely known within the business (European Communities2006a). However, the reputation and status which these systems have built up during the pastfew years, greatly depend on the confidence in meeting the promises of assuring quality andfood issues. If the standard is unable to come up to the expectations of consumers and businesspartners, the value of such a scheme is easy to doubt and trust is going to fade (Fulponi 2006:8). In consequence, the withdrawal of considerable parts of the supply chain could bring downthe entire system. Aside from this effect, a certification scheme is always exposed to the in-terests of censorious stakeholders (e. g. consumer associations and NGOs) who generally havegood connections to media and politics. In this cas e, even the rumour or accusation of flaws andscandals poses enormous problems for the reputation of the standard. Due to the complex structure of certification sche mes the risk of apparent flaws and scandals isgenerally high, but is also increased by several de velopments during the last few years. The ra-pid expansion, for instance, has extremely enhanced the number of participants within the sy-stems (e. g. more than 110,000 in the German QS-system). Most systems are expanding theirperformances (more production leve ls in the food chain, different products, etc.); some systems,like the QS-system, even aim to control the enti re supply chain – from th e animal feed industryto retailing. Furthermore, the interest of external stakeholders in food issues has increased andhas been extremely amplified by the mass media. With regard to the potential effects of these de velopments, the question is posed of whether therespected certification approaches ar e actually able to detect defi ciencies within the systems andthus prevent scandals and crises which may lead to the breakdown of standards. Most of the cer-tification schemes nowadays arrive at the point where they have to stay abreast of these changesand build mechanisms to prevent harm to their systems. Thus, the importance of this develop-ment should enforce the implementation of a cont rolling tool which monitors the audit quality,which in this contribution is defined as the quality or ability of a standard to meet its require-ments in order to ensure a high quality and safety of food products manufactured under the re-spective scheme. By analysing possible negative influences on the system, opportunisticbehaviour can be detected. Hence, the audit quality controlling tool should always be state-of-the-art, highly risk-orientated and flexible." @default.
• W2142952172 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2142952172 creator A5003442779 @default.
• W2142952172 creator A5082406894 @default.
• W2142952172 creator A5087432902 @default.
• W2142952172 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2142952172 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2142952172 title "System Dynamics in Quality Certifications: Development of an Audit Quality Controlling System" @default.
• W2142952172 cites W1501002337 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W1563948026 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W1587998322 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W1594805699 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2024646196 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2028448335 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2045661289 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2063234046 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2114570931 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2134805717 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2156380610 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2158076918 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2167313771 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2258421200 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W2258886617 @default.
• W2142952172 cites W72344620 @default.
• W2142952172 doi "https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.6585" @default.
• W2142952172 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2142952172 type Work @default.
• W2142952172 sameAs 2142952172 @default.
• W2142952172 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2142952172 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2142952172 hasAuthorship W2142952172A5003442779 @default.
• W2142952172 hasAuthorship W2142952172A5082406894 @default.
• W2142952172 hasAuthorship W2142952172A5087432902 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C108713360 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C201289532 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C108713360 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C111472728 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C121955636 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C138885662 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C144133560 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C162324750 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C162853370 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C17744445 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C187736073 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C199521495 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C199539241 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C201289532 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C2779530757 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C2780378061 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C46304622 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C48798503 @default.
• W2142952172 hasConceptScore W2142952172C71405471 @default.
• W2142952172 hasLocation W21429521721 @default.
• W2142952172 hasOpenAccess W2142952172 @default.
• W2142952172 hasPrimaryLocation W21429521721 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W1494170133 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W1527606616 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2036379395 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2077271257 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2083711165 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2272298631 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2311179416 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2333425827 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2376100279 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2514527441 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2515240691 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2521074821 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2531371737 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2620851957 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2909232582 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W3010427185 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W303858970 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W3202453840 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W8662999 @default.
• W2142952172 hasRelatedWork W2158063074 @default.
• W2142952172 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2142952172 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2142952172 magId "2142952172" @default.
• W2142952172 workType "article" @default.