Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2143146421> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2143146421 abstract "The operation of supply chains (SCs) has for many years been focused on efficiency, leanness and responsiveness. This has resulted in reduced slack in operations, compressed cycle times, increased productivity and minimised inventory levels along the SC. Combined with tight tolerance settings for the realisation of logistics and production processes, this has led to SC performances that are frequently not robust. SCs are becoming increasingly vulnerable to disturbances, which can decrease the competitive power of the entire chain in the market. Moreover, in the case of food SCs non-robust performances may ultimately result in empty shelves in grocery stores and supermarkets. The overall objective of this research is to contribute to Supply Chain Management (SCM) theory by developing a structured approach to assess SC vulnerability, so that robust performances of food SCs can be assured. We also aim to help companies in the food industry to evaluate their current state of vulnerability, and to improve their performance robustness through a better understanding of vulnerability issues. The following research questions (RQs) stem from these objectives: RQ1: What are the main research challenges related to (food) SC robustness? RQ2: What are the main elements that have to be considered in the design of robust SCs and what are the relationships between these elements? RQ3: What is the relationship between the contextual factors of food SCs and the use of disturbance management principles? RQ4: How to systematically assess the impact of disturbances in (food) SC processes on the robustness of (food) SC performances? To answer these RQs we used different methodologies, both qualitative and quantitative. For each question, we conducted a literature survey to identify gaps in existing research and define the state of the art of knowledge on the related topics. For the second and third RQ, we conducted both exploration and testing on selected case studies. Finally, to obtain more detailed answers to the fourth question, we used simulation modelling and scenario analysis for vulnerability assessment. Main findings are summarised as follows. Based on an extensive literature review, we answered RQ1. The main research challenges were related to the need to define SC robustness more precisely, to identify and classify disturbances and their causes in the context of the specific characteristics of SCs and to make a systematic overview of (re)design strategies that may improve SC robustness. Also, we found that it is useful to be able to discriminate between varying degrees of SC vulnerability and to find a measure that quantifies the extent to which a company or SC shows robust performances when exposed to disturbances. To address RQ2, we define SC robustness as the degree to which a SC shows an acceptable performance in (each of) its Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) during and after an unexpected event that caused a disturbance in one or more logistics processes. Based on the SCM literature we identified the main elements needed to achieve robust performances and structured them together to form a conceptual framework for the design of robust SCs. We then explained the logic of the framework and elaborate on each of its main elements: the SC scenario, SC disturbances, SC performance, sources of food SC vulnerability, and redesign principles and strategies. Based on three case studies, we answered RQ3. Our major findings show that the contextual factors have a consistent relationship to Disturbance Management Principles (DMPs). The product and SC environment characteristics are contextual factors that are hard to change and these characteristics initiate the use of specific DMPs as well as constrain the use of potential response actions. The process and the SC network characteristics are contextual factors that are easier to change, and they are affected by the use of the DMPs. We also found a notable relationship between the type of DMP likely to be used and the particular combination of contextual factors present in the observed SC. To address RQ4, we presented a new method for vulnerability assessments, the VULA method. The VULA method helps to identify how much a company is underperforming on a specific Key Performance Indicator (KPI) in the case of a disturbance, how often this would happen and how long it would last. It ultimately informs the decision maker about whether process redesign is needed and what kind of redesign strategies should be used in order to increase the SC’s robustness. The VULA method is demonstrated in the context of a meat SC using discrete-event simulation. The case findings show that performance robustness can be assessed for any KPI using the VULA method. To sum-up the project, all findings were incorporated within an integrated framework for designing robust SCs. The integrated framework consists of the following steps: 1) Description of the SC scenario and identification of its specific contextual factors; 2) Identification of disturbances that may affect KPIs; 3) Definition of the relevant KPIs and identification of the main disturbances through assessment of the SC performance robustness (i.e. application of the VULA method); 4) Identification of the sources of vulnerability that may (strongly) affect the robustness of performances and eventually increase the vulnerability of the SC; 5) Identification of appropriate preventive or disturbance impact reductive redesign strategies; 6) Alteration of SC scenario elements as required by the selected redesign strategies and repeat VULA method for KPIs, as defined in Step 3. Contributions of this research are listed as follows. First, we have identified emerging research areas - SC robustness, and its counterpart, vulnerability. Second, we have developed a definition of SC robustness, operationalized it, and identified and structured the relevant elements for the design of robust SCs in the form of a research framework. With this research framework, we contribute to a better understanding of the concepts of vulnerability and robustness and related issues in food SCs. Third, we identified the relationship between contextual factors of food SCs and specific DMPs used to maintain robust SC performances: characteristics of the product and the SC environment influence the selection and use of DMPs; processes and SC networks are influenced by DMPs. Fourth, we developed specific metrics for vulnerability assessments, which serve as a basis of a VULA method. The VULA method investigates different measures of the variability of both the duration of impacts from disturbances and the fluctuations in their magnitude. With this project, we also hope to have delivered practical insights into food SC vulnerability. First, the integrated framework for the design of robust SCs can be used to guide food companies in successful disturbance management. Second, empirical findings from case studies lead to the identification of changeable characteristics of SCs that can serve as a basis for assessing where to focus efforts to manage disturbances. Third, the VULA method can help top management to get more reliable information about the “health” of the company. The two most important research opportunities are: First, there is a need to extend and validate our findings related to the research framework and contextual factors through further case studies related to other types of (food) products and other types of SCs. Second, there is a need to further develop and test the VULA method, e.g.: to use other indicators and statistical measures for disturbance detection and SC improvement; to define the most appropriate KPI to represent the robustness of a complete SC. We hope this thesis invites other researchers to pick up these challenges and help us further improve the robustness of (food) SCs." @default.
- W2143146421 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2143146421 creator A5038074274 @default.
- W2143146421 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W2143146421 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2143146421 title "Robust food supply supply chains: An integrated framework for vulnerability assessment and disturbance management" @default.
- W2143146421 cites W127007545 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1491159743 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1511371479 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W152913885 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1548013290 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1552285276 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1557200796 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W157490045 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1580090600 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1586121026 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1604204877 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1658908529 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1785387976 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1814076407 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1870971125 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W188500255 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1898449201 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1965563040 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1967778082 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1968292003 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1968334972 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1968736185 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1968927530 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1969037328 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1969287756 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1971339186 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1971867652 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1973726086 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1974825656 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1976011727 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1983494146 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1983609473 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1986487488 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1987528494 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1988000931 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1988449467 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1989067310 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1991513695 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1992875080 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1993584001 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1994955415 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1994957719 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1995622474 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1997785204 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W1998895018 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2001851698 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2002976749 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2005301070 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2006485295 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2006573131 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2007046198 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2008109438 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2010815455 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2011573598 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2013285825 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2013822994 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2022022215 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2025350969 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2025571610 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2025945604 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2027569503 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2029431916 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2029684520 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2031384163 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2032152987 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2033768234 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2034893104 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2037722253 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2042893014 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2044247861 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2044946299 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2046225382 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2047099644 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2047344274 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2047866662 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2047900019 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2052598254 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2052634513 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2058476990 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2058525087 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2059103696 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2060068786 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2062792871 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2063272147 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2063484955 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2065869505 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2068602646 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2070854196 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2075562035 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2075772595 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2077660521 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2077663730 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2077808995 @default.
- W2143146421 cites W2078445598 @default.