Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2143593485> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2143593485 endingPage "445" @default.
- W2143593485 startingPage "440" @default.
- W2143593485 abstract "Purpose To examine the discriminatory performance of donor corneoscleral rim cultures for predicting endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation. Design Systematic literature review. Participants Studies that reported the prevalence of donor rim cultures after refrigerated preservation of donor corneas distributed for keratoplasty. Methods Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. Meta-regression and stratification explored study-level reasons for diagnostic performance. Main Outcome Measures Incidence of postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis. Results Of 17 614 corneal grafts, 2459 (14%) had a positive donor rim culture and 31 (0.2%) developed endophthalmitis. Twenty-one had concordant donor and recipient isolates, including 10 with Candida species. The sensitivity of donor rim cultures among 10 studies reporting postsurgical endophthalmitis was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%–83%), and specificity averaged 85%. Endophthalmitis occurred 12 (95% CI, 5–29) times more often among recipients of a culture-positive donor cornea. With Bayesian analysis, a culture-positive donor cornea would raise the infection risk to 1%, whereas fungal isolation from the donor rim predicts a 3% probability of fungal endophthalmitis. Pooling of studies was limited by a significant discrepancy among reports that could not be explained by differences in antibiotic supplementation of the preservation medium, method of culture inoculation, or type of culture medium. Conclusion Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty is more likely with a culture-positive donor rim, notably candidal endophthalmitis from fungal contaminants, but better evidence is needed to determine the prognostic value and manner of routine microbiological screening. To examine the discriminatory performance of donor corneoscleral rim cultures for predicting endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation. Systematic literature review. Studies that reported the prevalence of donor rim cultures after refrigerated preservation of donor corneas distributed for keratoplasty. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. Meta-regression and stratification explored study-level reasons for diagnostic performance. Incidence of postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis. Of 17 614 corneal grafts, 2459 (14%) had a positive donor rim culture and 31 (0.2%) developed endophthalmitis. Twenty-one had concordant donor and recipient isolates, including 10 with Candida species. The sensitivity of donor rim cultures among 10 studies reporting postsurgical endophthalmitis was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%–83%), and specificity averaged 85%. Endophthalmitis occurred 12 (95% CI, 5–29) times more often among recipients of a culture-positive donor cornea. With Bayesian analysis, a culture-positive donor cornea would raise the infection risk to 1%, whereas fungal isolation from the donor rim predicts a 3% probability of fungal endophthalmitis. Pooling of studies was limited by a significant discrepancy among reports that could not be explained by differences in antibiotic supplementation of the preservation medium, method of culture inoculation, or type of culture medium. Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty is more likely with a culture-positive donor rim, notably candidal endophthalmitis from fungal contaminants, but better evidence is needed to determine the prognostic value and manner of routine microbiological screening." @default.
- W2143593485 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2143593485 creator A5016321396 @default.
- W2143593485 creator A5016637664 @default.
- W2143593485 date "2007-03-01" @default.
- W2143593485 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W2143593485 title "The Prognostic Role of Donor Corneoscleral Rim Cultures in Corneal Transplantation" @default.
- W2143593485 cites W1644997609 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W1969571650 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W1971348077 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W1987596650 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W1997840961 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W1998742518 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2003740803 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2009089071 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2017095003 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2031805315 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2037595071 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2040341537 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2044032013 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2049915082 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2050406723 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2058014924 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2060708880 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2067077148 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2072306714 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2073094745 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2079277131 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2092926517 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2093579014 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2113009004 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2126852509 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2134852288 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2144420447 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2145402787 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2411593666 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W2467412454 @default.
- W2143593485 cites W91650790 @default.
- W2143593485 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.006" @default.
- W2143593485 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17324694" @default.
- W2143593485 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2143593485 type Work @default.
- W2143593485 sameAs 2143593485 @default.
- W2143593485 citedByCount "98" @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852012 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852013 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852014 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852015 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852016 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852017 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852018 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852019 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852020 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852021 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852022 @default.
- W2143593485 countsByYear W21435934852023 @default.
- W2143593485 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2143593485 hasAuthorship W2143593485A5016321396 @default.
- W2143593485 hasAuthorship W2143593485A5016637664 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C2777235844 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C2780686511 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C2909270721 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C118487528 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C126322002 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C141071460 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C156957248 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C2776882836 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C2777235844 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C2780686511 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C2909270721 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C2911091166 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C44249647 @default.
- W2143593485 hasConceptScore W2143593485C71924100 @default.
- W2143593485 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2143593485 hasLocation W21435934851 @default.
- W2143593485 hasLocation W21435934852 @default.
- W2143593485 hasOpenAccess W2143593485 @default.
- W2143593485 hasPrimaryLocation W21435934851 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W1998289489 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W2060708880 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W2118189722 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W2410983929 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W2793219127 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W3138348743 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W4230548191 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W4241391955 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W2036604037 @default.
- W2143593485 hasRelatedWork W2613093839 @default.
- W2143593485 hasVolume "114" @default.